/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"I ain’t driving twenty minutes to riot"

catalog
Mode: Reply
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8192

Files

Max file size: 20.00 MB

Max files: 3

Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules


/leftypol/ is a non-sectarian board for leftist discussion. Join our matrix! https://matrix.to/#/+leftychat:matrix.org IRC: Rizon.net #bunkerchan https://qchat.rizon.net/?channels=bunkerchan

(13.13 KB 710x406 Untitled.png)
/r/chapotraphouse BANNED Anonymous 06/29/2020 (Mon) 17:19:24 No. 651256
https://old.reddit.com/r/ChapoTrapHouse/ It's over. NOTE: DO NOT PUT YOUR EMAIL IN THE EMAIL FIELD Hijacking thread to make this a refugee processing center. REFUGEES PLEASE READ There are a lot of members with double citizenship, this isn't so much for you guys. First off, please read the OP in the FAQ thread. Since we're leftists, there shouldn't be many differences ideologically, but our community has its own jargon, and idiosyncrasies which might be jarring to outsiders. Second, although we use racial slurs, we are anti-bigotry and it will not be tolerated. Thirdly, the board has an anti-idpol rule. Meaning that discussion of idpol topics is not allowed. There is some flexibility, where that flexibility is, is subjective and also requires some time to get the feel of it. Fourthly, don't put anything in the name, or email fields. Don't doxx yourself. This is the containment thread for internet stuff. This includes a random tweet you screenshotted, or talking about ecelebs. >>637502 This thread is for Questions That Don't Deserve Their Own Thread: >>548092 This is the catalog, which is sometimes easier to browse the site with: https://bunkerchan.xyz/leftypol/catalog.html This is the "overboard" which shows recently posted stuff on the site: https://bunkerchan.xyz/sfwoverboard/ Stuff about the stock market or the economy goes here (unless a new thread would serve the topic better): >>8552 Check out our other less active, but still really nice boards. >>>/hobby/ >>>/tech/ >>>/edu/ >>>/games/ As well as our comrades over at /GET/ >>>/GET/ (funposting) >>>/ref/ (international discussion (also spanish speakers are trying to take over the board))
Edited last time by comraderat on 06/29/2020 (Mon) 19:35:35.
>>653673 >I mean thats r/politics that's not "us" is it? those are liberals in there. Yes. He is basically saying that he's banning all the "non-mainstream" political subs for reasons that would also apply to /r/politics. The neoliberal narrative is the "acceptable" narrative in some circles and it is being kept alive on reddit.
>>653679 >r/CTH is tankie I feel bad for you guys. That word seems to have grown from anti-revisionist to anyone not in the Western left's favored green in the political compass. I guess it sucks to be a scientific socialist autistic about definitions in a mass media environment.
>>653632 95% of redditors deserve to be executed on the sidewalk tbh
>>653679 >CTH also did violate a lot of Reddit's rules. Being a Pete supporter, I've seen how they brigaded our sub for weeks. They've also brigaded r/Obama just recently. It doesn't matter if you agree with them politically, they just pushed themselves into that corner and they did so repeatedly. All I can say about them is good riddance. Redditors should be executed alongside their families
>>653676 >emphasize being anti-bourgeois, it's common now largely because of the embourgeoisment of liberalism with globalization, college, and other trends since the 90s. People's material interests are beginning to become more apparent and they're beginning to check out of the spectacle since it doesn't even try to conform to people's reality anymore. >Whenever reds decide to make the left independent of liberalism again, the trend will reverse. Maybe I'm an optimist, but it is happening. What is being said about capitalism today would not have been acceptable at all 10 years ago but now is almost mainstream.
Does this board endorse joe biden for president? im new here
>>653698 >Does this board endorse joe biden for president? im new here No. Where are you coming from?
>>653681 meant to reply to you
>>653701 Can you link your reply?
>>653698 We don't endorse anyone. All US presidential candidates are garbage.
>>653647 >>653698 my point being i just dont see that as 'us' and we should hope they burn
>>653698 I'll be voting for Howie Hawkins
>>653703 Yeah, plus this board doesn't have official positions. We aren't an organization, just a discussion forum.
>>653709 maybe im just used to a miserable hivemind thats all
>>653712 Reddit will do that to you
>>653712 Leftypol is a lot but I wouldn't characterize it as a miserable hivemind.
>>653705 >my point being i just dont see that as 'us' and we should hope they burn Oh. I was just posting those replies saying that reddit is being hypocritical and they're doing it for obvious financial reasons. These guys want to monetize the website and all of those political subs are a major barrier. >>653712 Where did you come from /r/cth?
>>653686 incredibly based
Rumour has it that's it partly due to this leak: https://archive.fo/7FtVI Especially after the public anti-Zionist stance of BLM UK, more and more anti-Israeli rhetoric was noticeable on a lot of Leftist forums (even fairly mild ones like CTH). So the theory is that the neoliberal order is going mask off authoritarian now & exiling real Leftists from public discourse the same was they did the anti-semetic /pol/tards. This is why you can never trust a liberal, when push comes to shove, they're fine with a kind of queer-space IdPol friendly Technocratic Fascist oligarchy.
>>653716 >Leftypol is a lot but I wouldn't characterize it as a miserable hivemind. I think anon is talking about reddit or some other place.
>>653698 Yes. The board staff, site staff, and every user of both /GET/ and /leftypol/ endorse Joe Biden for President of the United States. It is mandatory to vote for Biden in November.
>>652715 but how are we supposed to be the elite vanguard if everyone knows about my secret club?
>>653720 well that does explain the radio silence around the annexation of palestine
>>653717 yes i can agree there it's true bs. i fled the main chapo a while ago but stuck around on cth2 additionally like half of my favorite subreddits are getting brigaded by refugees from left and right or are at risk of being banned/ already dicked by the admins
>>653720 >Especially after the public anti-Zionist stance of BLM UK, more and more anti-Israeli rhetoric was noticeable on a lot of Leftist forums (even fairly mild ones like CTH). So the theory is that the neoliberal order is going mask off authoritarian now & exiling real Leftists from public discourse the same was they did the anti-semetic /pol/tards. This is why you can never trust a liberal, when push comes to shove, they're fine with a kind of queer-space IdPol friendly Technocratic Fascist oligarchy. Why would this be the trigger though? Reddit has been trying to push off things that are controversial off their site to monetize it for years. I was on that website for longer than I should have and I still remember when there were huge scandals about /r/atheism not being a default sub and the whole /r/fatpeoplehate sub being banned. Reddit used to be A LOT different back in the day, not in terms of cringe (it was always there), but you used to be way more free to say anything. Now it is basically an ad every 5 posts with massive reddit gold purchases.
>>653720 every ADL Jew should be killed. Fucking parasites.
>>653671 >anarchists and succdems how about no moremoretankiechapo, genzedong, sendinthetanks are all much better subs
>>653716 reddit
>>653729 >yes i can agree there it's true bs. i fled the main chapo a while ago but stuck around on cth2 additionally like half of my favorite subreddits are getting brigaded by refugees from left and right or are at risk of being banned/ already dicked by the admins Yeah, I'd stay off reddit for a while or better yet forever. There are some good hobby subs, but goddamn do they get filled up with advertisers pretty quick, so watch out for that. /Leftypol/ is the only place for any sort of decent left-wing political discussion. At this point reddit is making the final leaps to more serious monetization and I have no doubt even /r/stupidpol will be on the chopping block.
>>653691 >People's material interests are beginning to become more apparent and they're beginning to check out of the spectacle since it doesn't even try to conform to people's reality anymore. Maybe you're right, but I don't know how you'll convince the rest of the left about this. The interests of nationals, or whites or whatever, in the imperialist countries never aligns with the proletariat, no? Just the petty bourgeoisie. I don't know your theory well. >>653691 >What is being said about capitalism today would not have been acceptable at all 10 years ago but now is almost mainstream Yes this is true.
>>653745 >Maybe you're right, but I don't know how you'll convince the rest of the left about this. The interests of nationals, or whites or whatever, in the imperialist countries never aligns with the proletariat, no? Just the petty bourgeoisie. I don't know your theory well. Can you elaborate on what you mean by this?
(48.06 KB 782x570 bunkerchan analytics.png)
>>653623 >>653633 >>653619 closest thing would probably be alexa analytics. 3 months ago we were placed at around 900k in the internet rankings. Now we're roughly 400k.
>>653746 its a 3rd worldist position that the citizens of the imperial core are not proletariat but labor aristocrats because of the hyper-exploitation of the 3rd world really how hyper-exploitation works is less that the proletariat broadly benefits and more that a small subset of the proletariat is elevated to petite-bouj as a result of the rampant consumerism providing a larger margin of profit for petite-bouj to flourish in the economy, and now with that failing we can see that the downwardly mobile petite-bouj are embracing reaction as a result, as the petite-bouj have tended to do.
>>653746 >Can you elaborate on what you mean by this? Not really, like I said I'm not familiar. The other guy said the reason I saw nationalists get more anti-bourgeois as they grew in loathing of liberalism was down to material interests being expressed more in everyday society. I don't believe, based on what I read, the interests of the majority demographic of an imperialist nation-state actually has a working class interest.
>>653754 Lol, a constant stream of hyappenings are keeping us afloat.
>>653760 That is usually how we draw new people in, yes.
Also, for anyone doubting what direction reddit is taking, it's actually pretty mundane and solely driven for profit. There is no doubt that all that porky wants is profits and will only do anything to increase them. Advertisers don't want to advertise on a site with non-approved politics or anything controversial (think /r/jailbait or /r/fatpeoplehate) so they want reddit to do a bit of housekeeping before they give them their money. Say what you want, but porky wants to avoid scandals at any cost. This is the future of reddit here on their front page: https://www.reddit.com/r/ChoosingBeggars/comments/hia83t/you_know_hes_broke/ https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/hi64vl/just_became_a_proud_american_and_you_can_bet_my/ https://www.reddit.com/r/RoastMe/comments/hi26ks/im_a_22_childish_collage_dropout_with_dyslexia/ Find it boring and bland? That means they are succeeding. They want the website to be a purely entertainment platform so that advertisers can advertise without much concern. Ultimately, reddit wants to take the large user base they cultivated and become a "cool and quirky" facebook. Use the great proverb: "If you don't know why it happened, it's because of money".
>>653763 thanks for the update captain obvious
>>652907 >Zizek >leftwing also, he's pretty famous. The go-to one is Cockshott, or maybe Bordiga
>>653766 >r/twoxchromosomes sounds like some reactionary shit
>>651256 pissed i cant have my dope Enver Hoxha flair anymore but this site will do
>>653775 surprisingly not
(13.50 KB 480x360 hqdefault (2).jpg)
why are the modern generation's attitudes and pop culture nowadays so bleak and meaningless? it's all the same sensationalist bullshit- whining about love, men, makeup, drugs or some other bullshit. whatever happened to our sense of community, comradeship? what good has this bullshit on our televisions ever done for people?
feels great to have never ever been a Reddit user, have to thank 4/v/ for all that reddit-hate indoctrination dating back to 2009 and even before
>>653785 google randonauting, that's what zoomers are up to
>>653779 use a flag
>>653766 >captain obvious Literally no one is talking about it this way though. It is all "oyvey wrongthink", "muh censorship of the left", "reddit hates women" etc, when in fact it is just another consequence of capitalism. >>653775 ok tranny
>>653794 >when in fact it is just another consequence of capitalism. thanks captain obvious
>>651256 So many bull preppers...
>>653785 I'm so fucking horny for art hoes. I want to fuck a coked-out tumblr hipster DIY aesthetic astrology thot in her lip gloss DSL mouth. I want to cum all over a girl with thick frame glasses and edge dyed bobcat bangs. Everytime I hear a THICK, waist-high-jean-clad braindead choker-wearing slutty wiccan minx say "yikes", "y'all", "big mood", "cancelled" or "this is a bop", I get an uncontrollable urge to run up to her and fondle her d cups and sweaty fat thighs. I want to pour ropes onto her contoured cheeks and neotenous faces and rhinoplatisized nose. I want to finger an art hoe through her jean overalls while pretending to be interested as she talks about van gogh and arctic monkeys and how david foster wallace fans suck and gilles deleuze and VICE news and 'union pool' in williamsburg and steven universe and homeopathy and saveur magazine and taking adderallto pass exams. IM SO. Fucking. Horny
>>653801 Ew, just shoot these bitch on sight. You're just going to get AIDS.
>>653801 omegakek
https://mobile.twitter.com/mr_grission/status/1277654168170303491 >one of the last places online to see lefty memes why dont more people know about /leftypol/? what do we have to do? bl*w something up?
>>653830 advertise whenever the opportunity comes and advertise in fertile places
(53.71 KB 658x438 big chungus banned.png)
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NOT THE HECKIN CHUNGEROO NOT THE BIG HECKIN CHONKY BOY https://www.reddit.com/r/bigchungus we cant FUCKING let them get away with this, /leftypol/.
refugee here started all the way back in 2009 on /mu/ at the ripe age of 19. Developed leftwing morals as parents to immigrants. fuck reddit.I'll be here to shitpost. I know the entire point of this is to shill biden
>>653859 based baiter
>>653859 >I know the entire point of this is to shill biden Get the fuck out
>>653735 >ever since the BO purge way back, we have had an anarchist deficit which I think we would benefit from resolving
>>653872 ok liberal
>>653735 >>653735 Tankie's just have an apathy for everything. Is that the point of this place? Just asking for 100% honesty
>>653879 I wish we could get sane anarchists instead of what ever the fuck the postleftist is peddling.
>>653872 >The /leftypol/yp would ban the right-wingers for their beliefs without a second thought Based as fuck
>>653895 You already do
>>653895 Isn't the thesis of your earlier wall of text premised on the fact you're in no position to do so, unless you're just a liberal LARPing as a nahtzee
>>653895 why the fuck wouldn't you retard? right wing spaces already do, we're fucking blood enemies cause you stand to preserve the existing order while we stand to destroy it for a better future.
(344.38 KB 220x213 ffwdf.gif)
>>653895 Do it faggot. Oh...wait...you don't even have an imageboard, that's right.
Chapo was talking about this in their episode.We should mention bunkerchan in their comment section. https://soundcloud.com/chapo-trap-house/432-entourage-every-day-feat-adam-friedland-62920
honestly the best part of the subreddit was how much it was hated by the hosts of the show >"waaahh don't besmirch our name noooo"
>>653922 Wow, are you the Admin of /pol/ Wow, what an honor
(35.52 KB 474x345 dcfdfdf.jpeg)
>>653922 >Boomchan is our home >No other imageboard existed prior, durring, or after 4chan >being this new
>>653922 Or wait... Do you think commies don't get b& on halfchan /hugboxpol/?
(492.98 KB 407x655 what about the memes.png)
>>653922 lelelelelelelel
>>653922 You call that a home boomer? This is shit-tier virtue signaling that your 'edgee rightoid'. When are you going to get rid all the pedophiles? Or your fine with that?
>>653872 >The problem with the right is that they have values Lmao. >The average neocon may feel ashamed about putting some faggot chapocel What a tragedy. The boomer neocons are so cucked some chapotard can beat him. Aren't you the "strongest will survive" crowd? >The problem with free speech is that you guys will ALWAYS successfully abuse it to destroy it and define free speech on YOUR terms. <Implying total free speech can ever exist while we have a state.
(18.51 KB 500x450 attention bunkerchan.png)
>>651256 reposting this, spread it far and wide
(1.61 MB 2126x1517 only the dead can revolt.jpeg)
>>653282 >>653295 Welcome to the new hell, anticoms. How does it feel that the Chapo influx may actually objectively improve the quality -- both communist and otherwise -- of this board? (I am very conflicted about Chapo myself, but even it is better than this shithole at times.) >>652988 Stirner was not an egoist, but otherwise yes. See >>>/dead/524.
I started to search on various Reddit clones/alternatives to see if CTHfags have bunkers there. So far I've found three of them. https://raddle.me/f/chapotraphouse (the most active) https://voat.co/v/ChapoTrapHouse/ (last post was made 5 months ago) https://saidit.net/s/ChapoTrapHouse/ (empty as my soul) https://dev.lemmy.ml/c/chapotraphouse (made 12 hours ago, but apparently they're planning to create an independent instance)
>>652726 They do and they are
>>653731 Being accused of anti-semetism is a LOT more serious than anti-body positive or something though. Read the link, it's pretty damming.
>>654074 >Being accused of anti-semetism is a LOT more serious than anti-body positive or something though. Read the link, it's pretty damming. That's true, but that's not what I'm trying to say. I'm saying that they're not covering up for the illegal settlements (although they will unintentionally since it stirs too much controversy), but that they want to make the website as bland as possible so advertisers will show up. They want no controversy at all, including both body shaming and any (perceived) anti-Semitism.
Don't they have other subs like r/moretankychapo?
>>654093 They banned all r/cth+n type subreddits. Tankie chapo for some reason is still up.
>>652964 Yes, Stirner killed my Bourgeois Individualism spook.
(323.33 KB 1472x1472 shadows of former lives.jpeg)
>>654064 And to the Chapo immigrants: Turn back while you still can. Unless you are willing to bear through the tankie and anticom/"rightcom" dead-enderism of Leninists, "Marxist"-Leninists, and their fascistic ilk (and not even the thoughtful sort, but only the most vulgarised and hollow-skulled parodies thereof), you will only serve as fodder for their immiseration project. Come here with an intact spine, your brain turned on, and your affect steeled against some of the most contemptible behaviour imaginable, always with the knowledge that /leftypol/ has still yet to overcome its legacy as lefty/pol/ (this board originated as an offshoot of /pol/), lest you become sucked into the dead-end microsimulation hellscape of this bubbleworld and find the real movement dead, its organs fertilising the ground beneath your feet. Though you may still be liberal in many ways and still unfamiliar with the political territories further beyond your maps -- and those unmappable altogether -- do not let the pseudo-leftists and left-reactionaries and anticommunists here dissuade and detract you from your leftward pursuits. Though the left communists and anarchists have largely since died or departed from this board, remnants still haunt it and they are often found in the post-left spectres occasionally breaking the monotony of pure ideology here. If you wish to escape this bubbleworld, follow those leads -- left communism and post-leftism -- into critiques and concrete communisms which are radically different, and radically more authentically left, than the performative husks here still rehearsing their 20th-century lines. Do not consider me normal; I am here to disrupt that, and have only recently begun my efforts. Both because I am not and because I do, I am near-universally despised here, already a persona non grata in the demonology here. But I will not be here forever, and I too shall eventually die or depart (again), and so you will not always have me as an ally whenever you seek thoughtful and nuanced discourse. Indeed, you will not find (many) allies here at all, unless you too oppose the real movement.
>>652958 >>652990 I for one welcome our new janny overlords
>>654104 >>654093 They get to live because they push Sakaist wrecker shit
>>654110 Ol-Oldfags, if i ignore him, he will go away? Right?
>>653210 >that I failed Beto KNOW THY PLACE, KNAVE
>>653264 they're leftist.
>>654127 He wants attention (negative or positive) and you shouldn't give it to him.
>>654127 unironically yes, lumpens like these feed on attention and dragging others down with them - do not interact with them negatively or positively unless you want your time wasted
>>654110 Based skitzo poster.
>>654110 Where do you recommend instead then?
(909.71 KB 2100x1410 bunker_ad.png)
(1.56 MB 2100x1410 bunker_ad2.png)
Reminder to post these ads all over reddit
>>653109 thank you for your service
>>654150 What the fuck am I looking at?
>>653524 based and redpilled
(159.05 KB 1440x900 isolation within collapse.jpeg)
>>654127 Or just engage me if you disagree. I am not harmful, except to all your conceptions of yourself and the world around you -- to all you think you know. Neglecting the critic may effectively silence their critique, but is a world without critique what you really want? >>654136 A case in point: the problem with me is that I am a lumpen, according to this anon, which is fundamentally an anticommunist and aristocratic-bourgeois view of the most abjected and alienated and declassed within the proletariat. Not that I am critical, nor that my critiques are flawed or undue or whatever might pass for a substantive response -- no, it is because I am this identity, "lumpen", which they have politicised to my detriment. The anticoms here, who very well may be the minority but so vocal a one that it is difficult sometimes to tell just how minor they really are, have nothing but contempt for the actual bodies who compose the proletariat and lumpenproletariat. They only care for workerist and idealist class conceptions of the Worker™ and the Working Class™, to the erasure of lumpen and the working bodies who constitute that class, and will endlessly valorise them and their work even though the whole point of communism is to abolish both. They do this because they have fundamentally never shed their /pol/ frameworks, only now class has substituted race in the war for which they rattle their sabres, yet identitarian just the same, all while pretending to be anti-idpol -- just like them. Forewarned is forearmed, ChapoTrapUnhoused: you are entering /pol/ territory, no matter its "lefty" characteristics.
>>654159 Silence, flag.
>>654161 Don't engage. Seriously. He thrives on this. All narcissists do. Ignore completely and he will eventually move on to greener pastures.
(44.61 KB 474x341 argggg.jpg)
>>654159 conceptions of yourself? What does even that mean? Lumpen-waht? What the fuck is happening? My brain feels like is leaking argggg I JUST WANTED HEALTHCARE
>>654165 just ignore them anon and read sane literature, if someone tells you to visit /dead/ tell them to suck your dick
>>654159 Again, where do you recommend instead? Where is this magical wonderland of enlightenment you grace us from? Don't jsut say "leftypol bad", provide an alternative.
>>654165 He's AnNil what do you expect?
Users have gone up by 50% but the quality seems the same, turns out the Chapos are much more tolerable guests than the r/soc wave we had a long time ago.
>>654183 How do you know?
>>654145 >>654169 Nowhere. The real movement is dead. What we see now is only its spectre still haunting us. All we have left are the vaulted tombs dedicated to it, where our words echo throughout its chambers and the lively springs in our steps only help march us deeper into the charnel house we find ourselves in, unable to Exit whence we entered and still searching for some way to Escape. We can only make camp in these labyrinthine halls, deep within the belly of this crypt as it slowly crumbles around us, the dread of collapse thickening the air like so much dust. We must eventually dig our ways Out if we want to Escape, however numb our fingers may become and bloody their nails are rendered, or else we too will be buried here when the stone sky above us finally falls.
>>654185 Checked the user count when the place was banned and when I woke up, up from 599 to 787 The user count isn't live though so I don't know at what time it updated, so I'm being a little generous
this place can't even get worse even with all the reddit people because of most of the ppl are 20-30 year old people who haven't read Marx and basically are dumb like niggers
(Apologies for the double post, it seems my post went through even though Bunkerchan didn't inform me it did.)
>>654198 Delete them newfag. Actually delete all this edgy lib shit wtf??
>>654193 Oh I see. You're larping & have nothing to say. How tedious.
>>654193 If you're not actually politically active, then step aside to those who are. It's good that you are criticizing people here who are stuck at home, or in their orgs engage only in party politics, or are pure armchairism and are "waiting for the revolution". Now apply the same to you and do self-crit.
>>653997 Hitler was right to kill millions of people, his only mistake was picking commies and jews instead of nazis and armchair sadists. >>654220 Agreed.
why did mussolini go fash
(1.25 MB 2037x2400 lead them to their graves.jpeg)
>>654163 Yes: "All narcissists do." Because all who do are narcissists. The problem is not narcissism, but its pathology; you clearly do not understand psychology/psychoanalysis beyond whatever you were exposed to in secondary school. But no, I am not a pathological "narcissist". Your attempts at medicalising and insanitising me is all too typical, but it reveals that you have no rebuttal. You want to disinform these newcomers that I am simply too crazy to warrant attention, for if they dare gaze into the abyss you fear it will begin gazing back. Asses cannot rid themselves of the gadfly by simply ignoring its sting. Gadflies are persistent and stinging is their nature, so do not blame the gadfly for your apathy. They only alert you to it, but you are responsible for it. >>654165 By "conceptions of yourself", I mean everything you think about yourself, all the identities and labels you hold dear, your very concept of self, your own belief of its existence. I am not harmful to you, only to "you". "Lumpen" is short for "lumpenproletariat", meaning "rags" or "scum" or "rabble" proletariat, the underclass of the proletariat where all the refuse of society collects and into which everyone tends to fall at some point -- unless you can afford not to. (Even Marx did, many times.) The proletariat is the term Marx used, drawing from the meaning of the term in Roman society for the class of propertyless workers and peoples, to describe something oversimplified to "workers" or "the working class", though the actual theory and class analysis is more subtle than that. More properly, the proletariat are those who do not own property, especially but not necessarily only of the means of production, itself a term describing the sum total means whereby society produces (and reproduces) itself through instruments of labour (like factories, machines, etc.) which are used on the subjects of labour (such as the raw materials like metal ore and timbre which go into producing instruments of labour and all other material products). These means of production are characterised by modes of production, which is a socioeconomic and historiographical concept that seeks to demarcate human history on the basis of the different modes these productive relations take. The current one is capitalism and it is where the modern proletariat are found. These proletariat are not necessarily workers, though they often are; and they are not necessarily poor, though they often are; and they are not necessarily producers of material goods, though they often are (except in postindustrial service economies, which outsource and automate that). In simpler terms, the proletariat are the class of people in society who do not own the businesses and tools and raw materials they use to produce the stuff in society, or the means whereby the stuff they consume is produced, yet nonetheless work to produce it and consume it all the same. They are not equivalent to workers, though vulgar economics (and vulgar Marxian theory) often treat them as so because much of Marxism (outside of left communism) does not resemble much of what Marx actually wrote. You have much to learn beyond the left-liberal ideological lands you are so accustomed to roaming. Some of it will be necessary to effectively navigate this new territory, but do not let the death cultists and marauders found here lead you astray and hawk you counterfeit maps which deceive you into tripping and stumbling your way around it and falling into all manner of pitfalls along your way -- some of which can prove fatal. Continue to strive toward better healthcare all you want, and advocate it with vigour! Just remember that these reforms will never fundamentally change the system of social relations which produce and reproduce the conditions in which healthcare is forever contested, precarious, and under threat of attack, because healthcare -- and its right and access and quality -- are ultimately optional in the basic reproduction of the social totality in which you live, as you can see by what you experience now. If you want to secure the goals you seek and package in such desires for healthcare, you will necessarily need to go beyond reforms and toward a fundamental transformation of the social totality and the basic and ideological means of its reproduction. In so many words, we must abolish capitalism. Indeed, we must abolish the present state of things in its entirety. That abolitionist project is called communism -- the communism Marx talked about, not later "Marxists" misrepresented and Soviet apologists here still do not understand: >Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established, an ideal to which reality [will] have to adjust itself. We call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence. ---Marx, The German Ideology (written 1845, first published 1932), Ch. 1 https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/ch01a.htm (I know "I JUST WANTED HEALTHCARE" is a meme, but it is not just a meme, and so it needs a response that itself is not merely memetic. I hope this has sufficed.)
>>654205 I don't set passwords for my posts and I used Tor to post, so deleting them is difficult and adding a password to each is labourious. Fortunately, these mishaps (and my typos) are rare enough that I don't really need to worry much about doing so anyway. By the way, I have been on the chans longer than you knew they existed, "newfag".
>>654268 didn't read but man is that pic badass
>>654275 >I don't really need to worry much about yeah you do, stop shitting up the board. >By the way I don't care. Jesus christ I know exactly who you are just by the lack of shame or self awareness. Why even bother with tor? Convenient for posting cp?
>>653775 correct
>>654110 based
>>654193 write gothic horror fiction
>>654252 Mussolini was formerly a Marxist who dabbled in some anarchism and was drawn into the national syndicalist / Italian futurist / fascist milieux, which originated straight out of some increasingly anti-Marxist leftist activities, and went with it. He did so because he began to believe that the socialist and "Communist" left could not fundamentally solve the social problems he saw and criticised Marxists for fundamentally investing themselves in a stillborn social project that tried to abolish the structural and systemic preconditions for social problems despite those preconditions being constitutive of societies in various forms and modes since the beginning of human history. In other words, the fascist critique was that the socialist/communist/Marxist left was trying to radically transform society to solve the social problems they diagnosed rather than try to solve them within the frameworks humans have lived in for millennia -- framed thus, fascism was almost a pragmatic or realpolitik response to the perceived radicalism and utopianism to their left. This was during a time when fascism was a nascent political movement in Italy comprising national syndicalists, national socialists (not Nazis, more like the Strasser brothers or Goebbels except without the monomaniacal antisemitism), and futurists, not the big bogeyman it is now (rightly) treated as being. Eventually, one thing led to another and the fascists (with Mussolini) basically made some deals with capitalists, especially financial capitalists in the urban centers (though also with some rural capitalists and the remaining landed aristocracy) to secure power by protecting their interests. They did this because they believed that they could then facilitate collaboration between the classes and negotiate the interests of all involved to the benefit of all involved without doing away with class or hierarchy, all of which would be administered through a totalitarian state apparatus. They then sought to win over the working masses with populist reforms that ameliorated their conditions and protected their rights, albeit much to the chagrin of these capitalists (who would be stuck paying for them). This had limited success, but did set the stage for the "passive revolution" of fascism that Gramsci noted. This was not entirely the case, though, because while this may have been the position of some early fascist intellectuals and ideologues, many of the nominal fascists who got involved, ran the show, and recruited the blackshirts were effectively just bourgeois opportunists using fascism to defend capitalism against these insurgent leftist activities in the region and abroad and build up Italy through a war economy. Some fascist critiques of Mussolini himself was that he was basically co-opted and recuperated by these forces into functioning as a bourgeois tool; some of this decisions and policies, especially the appeasement and deference he showed to finance capital in them, lend support to this. Moreover, there were radically right-reactionary critics of fascism, too, particularly from more traditionalist and primitivist perspectives such as those espoused by "superfascist" Julius Evola. These critiques centered around the implicitly modernist character, Marxoid vestiges, and decadent materialist values identified in fascism and its palingenetic pursuit, particularly to the detriment of spiritual wealth and fidelity to the eternal Traditions which have characterised human existence since its harmonious prehistorical origins (not really, but this primitivist mythos wrapped in all manner of occult esotericism and proto-New Age woo was a big part of Evola's critique). What was needed was not a national rebirth, but a spiritual one, and for society (in this case, Italian society) to reacquaint itself with the aristocratic soul found in Roman ethos rather than necessarily the political structure of its society. I'm skipping over a lot of history and nuance here, such as Gentile's philosophical contributions to fascist theory and philosophy and its Hegelian connection to some of the Right Hegelianism that Marx et al. were critiquing nearly a century before. But that is the basic context for why Mussolini turned toward fascism in his youth as a Marxist writing for a socialist paper, fascism then being a rather syncretic variant of anti-Marxist Italian leftist theory; how this fascism transformed into the brutish totalitarian terror regime of capitalism in decay, mainly through bourgeois recuperation and weaponisation; and how Mussolini then fit into all this in his later years as the Duke effectively serving as its figurehead after the original fascism that drew him had basically collapsed and been overrun by thugs funded through finance capital. None of this redeems fascism, even its early theoretical forms, all of which are contemptible in their own ways. However, this contextualise these events in a way that not only recognises the Marxian and broader sociological/historiographical analyses of fascism, but also fascism on its own terms and within its own theoretical traditions as a complex political ideology and worldview that is more than just capitalism in decay, or a bourgeois revolution, or big meanie evil monsters. They were all that in parts, in their own ways, even while not fully capturing fascism and not describing all fascists as reducible to that. If you want to understand fascism as a whole, and thus Mussolini as a particular figure in it, you must first reckon with fascism as a real and legitimate practical movement and theoretical body of work -- as real and legitimate as any other, even though it is the left's illegitimate son. Incidentally, doing so also helps you better understand contemporary right-reactionary and neoreactionary thought, and why Stalinists had characterised social democracy as "social fascism" -- and with good reason. It is perhaps the only time in history that Stalinists were right about anything.
doomer posting is bad, thread derailment is worse.
>>654367 Thank you based janny.
is this place just dead
>>654385 No, this is >>>/dead/
>>654385 welcome chapofag, we are slow but almost certainly not dead and when major events occur activity flares up greatly
>>654295 If you know who I am (and I can assure you that you do not), then contact me through the private channels only someone who knows me would know how. I still monitor the old accounts, so all it would take is a simple private message to prove it. That is the only way you can hope to have the slightest bit of leverage here. Posting any identity information here publicly amounts to doxing, and to do so in a thread actively monitored by the administration -- in a thread whose OP explicitly warns against doxing -- would be very unwise and will be denied regardless. All such attempts will at best unfairly malign some poor sap who has no association with me and expose them to undue harassment due to the undue contempt I have somehow garnered here. It will hopefully also get you banned. If you genuinely care to prove it, then do so with discretion, since it is the only rational move you have here. Otherwise, your mind games and rule-violating threats will not work to deter me, so kindly stop bluffing. Paranoia is fascist and I am no fascist. This is our space, not your space, so learn to share if you care so much about communism.
>>654385 It's usually slow at this hour. Picks up when Americans wake up.
(281.30 KB 817x767 initial DDDDD.png)
>>654367 >AnNil makes an interesting cohesive post for once >gets banned immediately for the straw that breaks the camel's back kek
>>654367 Janitor, I was responding to a question, potentially posted by a Chapo newcomer, which I can only assume you already saw. I do not mean to be derailing this thread; I am trying to do my part in responding to the newcomers here. And I am no normal doomer; I absurdly struggle against this doom I speak. I do not advocate resignation; I advocate struggle nonetheless. We may face a Sisyphean task before us, but that does not mean we should give up. But so be it. I will refrain from responding any further unless it is either relevant to this thread or directly replies to one of my posts (and I will try to connect this back to the thread topic). It is the least I can do to prevent yet another inappropriate ban of a Tor exit node that serves no purpose except to punish random other Tor users who want to contribute here through it.
>>654405 I won't be banned until all the Tor exit nodes are. I hope it doesn't come to that. Rather than banning the exit nodes, just tell me when I am crossing the line and I will do my best to respect it going forward (unless I think the charge is wildly undue). But this thread is not about me, so I'll stop talking about me in it.
>>654411 You can keep posting just start a new thread if you want to talk about this stuff. I haven’t read every post you’ve made in detail but you did take this thread very off topic. You seem very willing to not derail the thread again so I won’t ban you for evading the ban again. Just please remember that you can always make a new thread for a new discussion and that us jannies don’t like having ten reports for thread derailment.
>>653291 Because it's about money, and annoying politifags are driving off the normalfag market. It's not "hurrdurr dey hate us :_;", they don't give a shit about anything but drawing a profit and having a safe padded cell for advertisements.
>>654422 I am not good at making threads because I am honestly not good at judging when precisely to spin one off, since I generally consider my posts to be on-topic in a broad sense and worry that splitting it off will just generate more controversy when it does not bury my response. This is made all the worse by the fact that my responses are intend to be highly contextual and shaped in the moment, which make for bad OPs. Thus, I tend to feel trapped by countervailing conditions. But I will try to do so going forward. With that said, I will now drop it. No need to reply, I get the message.
>>654447 Please remember that you're not that special and that you can't demand that the mods make special allowances for you. Reign in your ego a little bit. You will get a much better reception if you learn to do this.
>>653165 stupidpol is very adjacent, yeah. What I dislike is the socdem cyclejerk but even then I wouldnt say they're majority there. Chapo was just everything bad in the modern left at one place really.
>>654110 Based. >>654454 >drop wisdom in a shitposting thread >jannies drop their capcodes and post cringe in response Fuck off please retard
>>654367 fascism as a philosophical, intellectual, sociological, structural, or what have you movement is secondary not because out of some ideological dismissal of said things but because all of these facets of fascism are inherently sidelined in favor of being an extension of the capitalist order because a mix of opportunists, already aligning with existing power structures, and the purging of any possible dissent. fascism has always ended up being the enforcer of capitalism in a period of crisis, no matter its supposed variations.
>>654422 >willing to not derail the thread again >again >I won’t ban you for evading the ban again >again Are you taking the piss? >If you know who I am (and I can assure you that you do not) I mean on leftypol aspd-kun you paranoid motherfucker. Stop posting cp and take a xanax. >>654491 stop samefagging it's pathetic
>>653720 frick link is down, what was the leak?
>>654454 I do not consider being told when I am misbehaving or violating the rules to be a "special allowance" and the fact that this is viewed as such is really a damning indictment of this administration on your part. The reality is that simply talking with anons here, in one's capacity as an authority with ban power, can go a very long way in positively shaping this board into being overall a more fulfilling and civil (insofar as chans can ever be) environment. Something as simple as a single-sentence post in a thread briefly warning that it has strayed off-topic, or an anon for derailing the thread, or that certain rules are being violating / about to be violated, can suffice to rectify the issue without resorting to bans that can otherwise harm the culture and lose anons who may have unknowingly broken rules or were just having bad days. If it persists, then maybe banhammers should start flying, since that was the minimal effort necessary to count as communication (in this case, of a warning) and it was not heeded. These are displays of "soft skills" and "soft power", both of which tend to effectuate better social outcomes than the public spectacles and abrupt thread cleansings can ever do. Anyway, such hard and power-tripping behaviour is something for which reddit moderators are notorious; should the administration really be resembling them in any capacity, including on this point? This is intimately and saliently relevant to the thread topic because this influx of Chapo refugees will bring with it many growing pains if they persist, including the influx of increased "idpol" and rather reddit-tier humour that, to a chan, may be viewed as disruptive or even a level (or, rather, type) of shitposting that should not be tolerated. If the administration wants to handle this moment with competence and couth, a more socially engaged, interactive, and hands-on approach that privileges communication before banishment is optimal toward that end. Otherwise, if it proceeds to ban -- and do so publicly to spectacular display -- first rather than even attempt to resolve the problem with consideration for the interests of ''all' involved, then we will simply be losing potential regulars who could be radicalised from their reddit left-liberalism and terrorising those remaining into thinking that this board is hostile to their very presence. I say this because I want this board to succeed, and for its administration to facilitate that; and because I think this subreddit ban provides a critical moment whereby we as a board can potentially bring the Chapo diaspora into its fold. The administration has already displayed its ability to handle issues in this way, so this is not a matter of incompetence or inability; I mainly disagree with how quickly bans fly without warning and the fact that a more socially engaged administration is considered so abnormal as to be seen as "special" when it occurs. I say this as someone with years of past experience moderating and managing communities with anywhere between a few hundred to hundreds of thousands of users. I am not unfamiliar with the seats in which these volunteers now sit, and I am all too accustomed to seeing my colleagues simply banish the disruptors and troublemakers and trolls even when they were not (or knew no better) for the sake of expediency, spectacle, and a disinterest in more active moderation of discussion. And I know acutely how quickly they resort to such measures not so much out of callous disregard, but to economise on time due to being woefully understaffed and chronically overworked -- I too have been tempted to resort to such rapid hammering at times, myself, back when I held such positions. In that sense, though I did not really intend it in this instance, I suppose I am a disruptive challenge in that sense here, too, since I serve here as a case in point of why such "soft"ness is needed: At least until all the Tor exit nodes (and all the VPN nodes and proxies I have) are banned, there is actually nothing stopping me from evading every single ban and continuing along my merry way, so this "hard power" actually is useless here unless a protracted whack-a-mole is going to be the name of the game. I am not saying I will do that (and I actually have no intention of doing that), since my point here is to be disruptive in a positive and transformative sense and frankly do not like that my honest attempts at contributing to this board are being so ill-received; but my point here is precisely that I have way more power and leverage here than the typical anon due to these conditions, since I could do that and jeopardise the remaining Tor exit nodes, VPN servers, and proxy chains other regular anons already/can/will use in the process. (I don't want to punish innocent random anons by forcing janitor hands like that, though, hence my behaviour above.) So, if what I am suggesting here seems like "special allowances" (it is not, nobody is allowing me to behave as I do), then all the more reason for the governing paradigm of this administration to change such that handling anons like me this way is the normal approach rather than the special case. I am not interested in being special here, though I invariably seem so because of how much I stand out here; all I want is to be treated with dignity and consideration as a fellow anon here trying to share this space. If that is too much to ask, then I deeply worry for the future of this board and caution the Chapo refugees ever the more intensely because of it. That said, while this reply has tried to remain on-topic, any further discussion here may be best taken to the moderation feedback thread at >>314001, since this is already straddling between the two. Hopefully I have stayed within the bounds of this one in this instance. If not, then at least rest assured that no further replies to this particular subthread will come from me on this thread. And lastly, this is not an ego issue at all and it is tiring that the only way anons can conceive of my existence is as thus simply because I make a big splash whenever I hurl into a thread, but this thread is not about me, so I'll just leave it at that. >>654528 I tend to agree and consider that an understandable critique of fascism, but that is not what I usually see articulated by antifascists and "M"L types, who do seem to "sideline" all these "secondary" considerations to restate the usual line of "fascism=capitalism in decay" without ever elaborating in the way you have. But if you want to discuss this further, I suppose I can use that fascist post to spin off a new thread and we can take it there. Otherwise, I have nothing much more that I am willing to say here. >>654567 Literally who? Wow, you got me going there for a moment! I actually almost thought you knew who I was! No, I have no idea who "aspd-kun" is and frankly don't care to know, though a part of me is intrigued because either you are totally incompetent at identifying anons or this person is my double! Thanks for putting those worries to rest. Remember: paranoia is fascist. Also wasn't samefagging, I don't do that. Now please stop making this thread about me. This is my final response to this little tangent.
>>654454 Clearly we are already giving them special treatment, as they are the only poster on the board not allowed to "derail". Free nihilist poster!
>>652952 Haven's seen anyone talk about Althusser yet.
>>654582 If you want to be treated with dignity and consideration I suggest that you start treating other people that way. The fact you can't understand how you come across is an indictment of your character no matter how hard you want to deny it.
>>654590 Why do you insist on being obnoxious you dumb motherfucker?
(66.90 KB 800x502 projector.jpg)
>>654600 worthless garbage mod you belong on reddit
>>654601 Stop derailing or I'm bound by the law to ban you :>)
>>654590 If you really think that poster haven't been allowed to derail you haven't been paying attention.
>>654605 They were just banned for doing so. If we're going to ban the nihilist poster for derail, then I feel morally obliged to ban 90% of our user base for doing the same. The only reason the nihilist posts stand out as derail is because they actually have substance, as opposed to the thousands of off-topic shit posts posted here every day.
>>654608 >They were just banned for doing so. And then immediately after they posted with a new account (ban evasion) >i'm not samefagging I just love sucking this posters dick and coddling his incessant blogposting like a mommy gf
>>654608 derailing with great effort is worse than derailing with a couple tiny shitposts tbh
>>654608 I still think you are being very lenient with a guy who admits he's ban evading repeatedly. He also samefags a lot, in a fairly obvious manner. I find to be very annoying to deal with and I know that a lot of users feel the same. It feels a bit weird to see jannies enabling his behavior honestly.
>>654603 try it faggot your boy isn't the only one who can change his IP
>>654612 >with a new account Lol. >i'm not samefagging I just love sucking this posters dick and coddling his incessant blogposting like a mommy gf Okay buddy. >>654613 I disagree very much. There is so little actual discussion on this board at the moment. Every second post is "gtfo nigger" or equally low quality. No one takes any time to actually write out any argument, because bullying people out of the thread is a more effective way of dealing with dissent. >>654619 Banning on an image board is a purely formal thing, anyone can change their IP and be done with it. Their post was basically the ban appeal, and either way I would've lifted their ban, because it was completely unfounded. What do you mean they samefag? I'm pretty sure they post with their flag with every post. Either way, take further posts about this to the mod thread.
>>654619 Yeah exactly. Many a thread has been made more shitty because mods let this guy shut down all productive discussion. Is he on the mod team or something? What's up?
>>654625 >Every second post is "gtfo nigger" or equally low quality. No one takes any time to actually write out any argument, because bullying people out of the thread is a more effective way of dealing with dissent. That's because nobody gives a shit about two word posts. What they do give a shit about is incessant sectarian blog posts written in threads where they don't belong.
>>654625 I disagree very much. There is so little actual discussion on this board at the moment. Every second post is "gtfo nigger" or equally low quality. why do you think that is? There are plenty of good threads and posts that just get buried by bad faith posters like this. >take further posts about this to the mod thread. Yeah no shit, bit late for that but at least you'll ban the troll since your a vol and concerned about further shitting up this thread right? As >>654628 said, it's the 10 minutes of unhindered blog posting that fucks with the thread.
>>654637 Blog posting? Someone asked about Mussolini and they provided a detailed post. There was nothing in that post about the nihilist poster them self, just an anon sharing knowledge on a subject someone asked about. ffs
>>653882 the point is to think for yourself. there's no reason to join a faction here if you don't want to.
>>654651 this isn; the only thread where they've eposted long posts and responses, in many other threads they have before posted long-winded sectarian blog-posts. E.g. the CHAZ thread
>>654655 Basically the issue is they've been banned because either the mod cba reading the post or because someone reported them when they weren't actually doing anything despite normally blogposting then
>>654651 Have you read his other posts in this thread?
(77.97 KB 720x683 tfwgfht.jpg)
Instead of giving old mate his narcissistic supply, post pictures of your moms.
>>654685 thank you
>>654664 Yeah, I have. They were on topic, and got bombarded with "gtfo nigger" posts. Them responding to those posts is actually the *real* derail, am I right? The reason you're trying to get them banned for derail is because your bullying tactics didn't work.
>>654697 any chapofags that don't updoot this post are rosakillers
>>654681 bro plz
(30.10 KB 600x614 camila_vallejo.jpg)
>>654751 sorry bro, you gotta post candids of your mom if you want your posting pass
(141.13 KB 969x1600 wagenknecht (2).jpg)
(203.36 KB 971x823 Wagenknecht (1).jpg)
(765.08 KB 1564x2000 Wagenknecht1.jpg)
uwu
>>652836 I think you rather meant sister(male) right?
>>654775 owo Atleast mtc and fc are still up
>>654764 Fuck, she may be a traitor but I still love her bros...
>>654833 what did she go succdem?
>>654596 Incidentally, I seem to be the only one bringing up explicitly Althusserian theory and points, at least as far as I have seen in my short revisit here. For example, I talk about interpellation in >>647263 (different thread) and >>646665 (another different thread), the latter of which I mentioned Althusser explicitly. In that first different thread, I also applied in >>653824 Althusser's notion of how the base determines the superstructure only in the last instance. Throughout my commentary on ideology and superstructure, my views are informed by Althusser (among many others). I also mentioned interpellation throughout the /CHAZ/ thread, but those are all long gone by now. >>654612 >account nice meme As for the many anons here (I won't quote all their posts) who keep on making this about me, drop it already. It's not the thread topic. The "narcissist" with the huge "ego" already has. (And for the record, since these constant canards seem to be endless, I actually don't samefag and I am just as surprised as others are here that anyone is defending me. See >>654843 for an expanded argument. When will the conspiracy theory of me being the volunteer who is "defending" me finally begin? Also, thinking that I treat others like shit, especially relative to this environment, is actually obscene levels of not paying attention.)
Oh lovely. The nihilist skeleton-fucker hobo has found this thread. Prepare yourself for endless long winded rants about how he's the only real communist in the world, everyone else are just posers. Chapo refugees, pay this retard no mind, he is literally a schizophrenic.
>>654625 holy shit our vol are bad this is supposed to be a refugee welcome thread ? it's a pile of garbage thank to a schizo that doesn't get cleaned up old BO was right, our current mods are fags, fucking ban retards and delete post ffs, this thread is fucking unreadable
>>654887 >mfw i want old bo back
>>654880 >Prepare yourself for endless long winded rants about how he's the only real communist in the world, everyone else are just posers. tbh i find it somewhat refreshing, at least schizohoboposter has real contrarian takes on the protests rather than typical leftcom derision and fishing for rightoid support
>>654891 that's a >4 week ban for imperialism, strasserism and denigrating the Red Guard fighting on the Twitter front
>r/leftistpodcasts got banhammered What the fuck, literally just a podcast aggregator
>>654880 When I saw the nihilist poster, I prepared for endless shitposts by butthurt theorylets
>>654880 Literally not schizophrenic, I stated that multiple times, fascist. And given >>654887, you are apparently not very competent at reading threads, anyway, since you seem to be mistaking all the broken links due to this thread being cyclical as censorship. At least you are easy to identify, since your shitposts are identical in what little content they have each time: "hobo bad, vols bad, look at how bad both made thread, so unreadable." Now stop talking about me already and get back to your writing more fanfiction about me. You seem to love it, but here is not the place.
>>654894 Criticism of the protests (which centered around criticism of CHAZ mostly, tbh) was far more grounded and in depth than "leftocm derision" or "fishing for rightoid support" (Whatever that means). There were some well thought out criticisms posted in the CHAZ thread, they just got buried and pushed off the thread by pages and pages and pages of shizo ranting, contrarianism, accusing everyone and their dog of being "anticommunist" and saying that anyone who disagreed should be executed to preserve the purity of the "movement". Don't even get me started about the insane off-topic tangents that nihilist poster took that thread on. Vegan predators was probably the worst example.
>>654891 faggot
>>654909 >Literally not schizophrenic, I stated that multiple times, fascist. Literally not fascist, I stated that multiple times, schizo
>>654915 This is pretty much it. It was disruptive, derailing, needless sectarian and pretty much a complete thread ruiner. I don't understand why our jannies can't see this.
>>654110 >All this posting while you could have simply took your meds Truly schizoposting
>>654110 >if you're not like me, you're a fascist :DDD go eat more cow dung
>>654159 >Or just engage me if you disagree. I am not harmful, except to all your conceptions of yourself and the world around you -- to all you think you know. Neglecting the critic may effectively silence their critique, but is a world without critique what you really want? >critique is when you use skeletons to say that the person you are critiquing is a fascist ML who should become a based enlightened post-leftist like yourself
>>654887 Really, why isn't he just banned on sight? He's already ban evading, he just wants to shit up threads and get negative attention to stroke off and satiate his NPD. Buddy no one is impressed by how smart you think you are, the alruistic thing for you to do is to kill yourself. I'm not saying this from a place of anger but of compassion for the honest working non clusterb-tards on this site.
>>654110 Ignore this man he has lost his composure Just read these two texts to catch up to speed newfrens https://www.marxists.org/archive/cafiero/1879/summary-of-capital.htm https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htm My sympathies to you on the loss of your homeland due to the depredations of the capitalist menace o7
>>654926 He LITERALLY admits he's here to disrupt our board right here: >>654110 The jannies' coddling of this guy had been the most insane part of any of this. Any sane moderation would have banned him years ago.
>>654962 OMG someone wants to DISRUPT our board? Jesus fuck, what are we going to do once we're no longer entirely harmonious? :OOOOOO
(45.65 KB 300x250 noticemesenpai.png)
>>654962 looks like >>556389 has a new project based chapo retards please continue grazing in peace
>>654915 yeah i'm more talking about other leftist spaces, leftypol has been pretty fair in the discussion of the protests, other places either give into idpol immediately or suddenly start saying stuff about how poor whites were the real victim of Jim Crow laws
>>654971 moderate the fucking board, maybe? What the fuck is the point of having any jannies if the only thing they do is anchor a nazi thread after it has gotten 300 posts
>>654971 Why should we tolerate posters who are clearly here in bad faith?
>>654977 That's not what bad faith means, you imbecile.
>>654977 XD you think that the mods should ban people WHEN THEY're BREAKING THE BOARD'S RULES??? What are you, a FASCIST?
i'm new and i noticed a glaring flaw, the description of the /game/ board says hopsotch instead of hopscotch. this place is literally unusable to me until this is fixed.
>>654980 What rules?
>>654983 go to /gulag/ no, really that actually is the board
>>654985 Repeated ban evasions for instance.
>>654985 "To ensure a basic level of quality, topics or posts will not be tolerated when contributions are not conductive to well-intentioned discussion. Therefore, posts that; (1) argue under false pretences ("false flagging") (2) imply reactionary positions of the userbase as a form of group shaming (3) are of an overly derisive and mocking nature (4) are of a gratuitously offensive or hysterical nature (5) are debating inherently reactionary topics where no reasonable debate is possible" post-leftist poster has made posts that violate (2), (3), (4) and (5)
>>654988 lmao nice name for a meta board
>>654993 also ban evasion, and being really obsessed with age of consent laws.
>>654993 Number 2 is the most glaring. This is a non-sectarian board and having someone running around claiming that everybody who disagrees with him is an anti-communist is really not acceptable on a non-sectarian board. You don't have to like other tendencies, but we are all communists here.
>>654976 To censor all references to s*y
nihilist poster and anti-nihilist poster need to get a room and FUCK
>>655015 and live stream it.
>>655013 Absolute madman
>>655015 There are many anti-nihilist posters because noone here (besides the jannies apparently) likes nihilist poster, so that "fuck" would end u being a gang bang.
I am glad that we got this thread back on track and away from the incredibly off topic discussion of Mussolini
(47.56 KB 680x510 Chappedboys.jpg)
Who is the most spoonable chapo?
>>655026 Amber obviously
>>655034 t. manlet
>>655034 why amber tho?
>>655026 Is it mandatory for american leftists to be unshaven cravenly creatures? Only the guy on the right lacks an unkempt beard
>>655026 god felix is such a chad
>>654915 I was there monitoring the thread for literally a week straight, seeing just about every single post and verifying as much by comparing the posts to cached copies. I can assure everyone here that there was not much activity on the /CHAZ/ thread which was substantive (unless hysterically disconnected C.H.A.Z. whinging that lacked any systematic critique counts) and had I not been posting, the thread might have actually 404'd it was so slow at times while I was gone. I was the major cause for why it kept getting bumped up to the top and, incidentally, was also the one doing most of the substantial critiquing. There were others, but this bollocks about it being replete with thoughtful critique before and while I posted is not only factually inaccurate, but it does not even correspond with what anyone who has spent more than a few days here can expect from any thread, let alone a fast-moving cyclical megathread. It reeks of trying to dupe newfags. Yes, substantive posts beside mine existed, but they were drowned out and buried by shitposting and petty bickering regardless of my role in it all. If anything, I was the one highlighting the more substantive posts through my replies, thereby giving them further attention, because I made it a point to give attention to any critical non-shitpost that came along. But alas, all you have is the word of a schizophrenic hobo freegan who freebases crack in a shanty full of drying cement (or so they like to tell us) versus this shining pillar of the community. The evidence has since been erased -- that is, unless you want me to do full-thread screenshots of the couple saved copies of it that I still have? >>654921 No you have not. It is fascist to try to silence someone using hegemonic psychiatric tools of social control because it relies on stratification, organism, paranoia, and conformity to hegemonic normative conceptions of identity. Read Deleuze, specifically Anti-Oedipus and Capitalism and Schizophrenia. >>654955 Stalin is literally one of the last people to read and he fundamentally failed to understand dialectics or dialectical materialism at literally every level. To suggest such a fractally wrong work, especially to beginners, feels almost like opportunism for the sake of ideological capture. And here I am defending myself again. I keep falling into this trap, but feel compelled to respond because this torrent of absolute bollocks needs some pushback (cf. >>642495). Do I just need to create a thread about me so you fucking fools can be contained to something that's on-topic for once, where all the fanfic in the world can be unloaded onto this site? Because this belated mob of whingers following me wherever I go is literally the single most disruptive (and not in a good sense) and derailing part of my arrival in each thread. It's not even me, just these fuckers.
>>655038 Because she's small so you can bend your knees while spooning and put your chin on her shoulders. It's comfy.
>>655044 Yeah otherwise they revoke your juul.
>>655049 i asked you like three questions and none of them got answered because you were too tired each time or something lol
>>655049 I think you should create your own thread and start posting with a tripcode. Then the people who want to read your posts and discuss them can do so, and you will be safe from abuse from those you don't want to read. It would solve a lot of problems, both for the community and for you.
>>655050 okay cute >>655045 >god felix is such a chad he really is, would finish halo 2 with and cuddle in his lap
(38.04 KB 480x480 dear radical liberals.jpg)
So THIS is why radlibs are plaguing leftypol now? Ugh
>>653851 But why r/bigchungus? What the fuck is the reason? How does it promote hate?!
>>654110 >Blackflag poster lecturing anyone and calling people fascists the sheer irony is amazing. Hiding behind excessively long posts waffling on about nothing concrete, while whining about your boogiemen is pathetic. If you hate this place so much, you leave first, shill.
>>655049 >I was there monitoring the thread for literally a week straight So you're a redditard who wastes their time on a pointless radlib board and then have the gall to come here and assert some iditic highground. Just leave, go to some other reddit board then. Using long winding text-wall blogposts does not make you intelligent or interesting. >Stalin is literally one of the last people to read and he fundamentally failed to understand dialectics Wrong again but then again you have no argument except ad hominum so why am I surprised >It is fascist to try to silence someone using hegemonic psychiatric tools of social control Stop using words you don't understand about people you don't know.
>>651256 >soyboys, slide threads and trolls will flood this website just like they did on 4chan after r/the_Donald was banned >mods promote this
>>655116 Just report them, and don't reply to any posts that aren't disingenuous shitposting, no matter how longwinded they are.
>>655026 Why is amber such a cute boy?
Getting back on topic, are there any chapo refugees here? If so, could you tell us how you found out about us?
>>654993 I have not violated any of them, but at most (2), and even then I have always qualified that I am talking about what may be a vocal minority whose cacaphony has established a board consensus that is hostile to communism. Criticising this board for being anticommunist is not an accusation of it being reactionary. I have accused certain tendencies of being reactionary, usually with reasons stated for why, but that is far from being a general accusation. And in no instances was it for "group shaming" purposes, unless you count literally all critique at a group level to amount to that, in which case (2) is basically just a thesis for justifying an insular board culture which is immune from criticism and hostile to any attempts at it. (3) does not apply because my posts are by far some of the least "derisive" and "mocking" on this whole fucking board. Do you not see the responses I get? Expressing discontent alongside a substantive response is at worst expected in chan culture and so is not violating it anymore than literally everyone does. (4) does not apply because I have actually tried to avoid hystericism at all costs and have not attempted to be needlessly offensive. Both are counterproductive to my intent. Yes, I have been polemical at times and my "ruthless criticism of all that exists" is indeed ruthless, but I will not be sorry for my commitment to critique, particularly critique of a Marxian character. (5) does not apply because it is ludicrous to even suggest as much. On what fucking basis have I been "debating inherently reactionary topics where no reasonable debate is possible"? What fucking topic? I don't even know how to respond to this further because it literally has no basis in reality, even less so than the prior charges. >>655009 This has never genuinely been a non-sectarian board and you are a newfag (or a concern troll) if you honestly cite that as anything more than a bad joke. This has been a running gag since the beginning of this board and the sectarianism is now worse than ever, with "succdem" and "demsucc" and "postie" and so on being used left and right, all couched in the most absolute contempt for each other and sectarian policing of who's "in" and who's not. To act has if this board has ever been even generally anti-sectarian is pure fantasy and alone violates (4). My position is not that anyone who disagrees with me is communist. It's that anyone who disagrees with Marx on communism is anticommunist, at least insofar as communism is understood in Marxian terms. Yes, I have my own embellishments to my critique from how I read Marx (and who I read Marx through), but the foundation of it is firmly in a Marxian understanding of communism, especially as described in the first chapter of The German Ideology. >>655059 When was that? I have quite a backlog still. I am very unpopular. >>655064 Regarding tripcodes, see >>642258. Regarding my own thread, I really absolutely do not want that, not least because it violates my commitment to only submit /leftypol/ threads that are actually board-subject-relevant and I do not consider myself that. (I have also not yet submitted a thread of my own for that very reason. I am here to critique, not to command attention.) But at this point, if it does the board a service by containing the lynch mob to their fanfic collaboration thread, I am reluctantly willing to do it. I doubt Rebel was allotted such honours, though -- at least, except when Rebel hijacked an anti-Rebel thread. (Rebel also hated me, by the way, and I was apparently the only person they ever told "kill yourself" to.) But really, all of this is caused by the reactions to me and the failure for the overwhelming majority of respondents to do anything more than gnash their teeth in my general direction. The only reason why I have effectively commanded so much attention from this board, and have inadvertently shifted entire threads to focus on me (such as here), has everything to do with how much I stand out and how much so many of the petty manchildren despise that I do. If all my detractors would just fucking ignore me and get over having their threads pristine and filtered into bubbles only they reside in -- in other words share this space -- this wouldn't happen. I wouldn't be controlling the course of entire threads by simply posting in them. I wouldn't be causing the entire discursive orbit to bend around my gravity upon my mere passing. I would just be yet another anon screaming into the void, pondering Warnock's dilemma, and wondering if anyone even cares. I am told nobody does, but when I am told that a dozen different times by a dozen different anons who all seethe through their teeth that I am literally the greatest wrecker this board has ever seen, I begin to doubt such claims. At some point, if ever I am told that I have actually violated these rules and am no longer wanted here by the administration, I expect to look to my side and see a long line of heads resting on stumps to join me in my execution, because the hysterians who have ruined every thread I have disgraced with their litany of lies deserved the ax long before I ever did. This is my final post in this thread. It is clear that the lynch mob cannot help but to shit it up whenever I dare to provide my input, so for the sake of this thread, I am bowing out.
>>655097 What even *was* big chungus?
(56.72 KB 720x553 apologize to the tree.jpg)
>>655149 >More walltext blogpost whining and deflecting No-one cares you long-winded cunt, go back to reddit, you violate the rules and then try to use the most lawyeresque bullshit to try and twist it's "others" violating the rules and you being some innocent. People telling you to fuck off and reporting you are doing it because you're just a provocative cunt with no argument, but unlike most shitposters, write literal text-walls of nothing. No-one wants to see you anarchist LARPing that you deny as "nihilism". Just crawl under a rock and die and let other people live in peace you demented twat. Using long phrases and waving around your supposed erudite qualities does not make you intelligent, just an arrogant show-off with delusions of grandeur, that you are in denial about.
i've decided i dont care about lib shit anymore i'm gonna use slurs if i want. fuck you.
(430.58 KB 800x733 bb9.png)
>>655149 >If all my detractors would just fucking ignore me >I wouldn't be controlling the course of entire threads by simply posting in them <Oh yeah I'm just posting massive text-wall responses to a bunch of people simultaneously while purposely writing in an inflammatory way thus derailing the thread with my nihilism, but its totally YOUR fault for falling for it You're cancer and your nitpicking and other bullshit is tiresome spam. Just jump into the pit you came from. >>655168 Good, you're learning >>655161 It was this dumb meme about Bugs Bunny when he made himself fat to mock Elmer Fudd and like Ultra Instinct Shaggy, persisted for way too long.
>>655044 >shaving in the year 2020
>>655149 >board-subject-relevant and I do not consider myself that. (I have also not yet submitted a thread of my own for that very reason. I am here to critique, not to command attention.) THEN GO TO FUCKING /DEAD/ YOU FAGGOT
(972.85 KB 256x186 autism in this post.gif)
>>655149 >I am just a critic, I'm not here to present real solutions This is you and you are cancer. Leave and never comeback or even reference us.
>>655149 >(3) does not apply because my posts are by far some of the least "derisive" and "mocking" on this whole fucking board. Do you not see the responses I get? Expressing discontent alongside a substantive response is at worst expected in chan culture and so is not violating it anymore than literally everyone does. They are derisive and mocking when you expect people to take you seriously when you tell them to kill yourself, call anyone who critiques you a fascist and then subsequently start bitching about how you're "just here to give constructive criticism". Nothing you say is criticism. All your posts have the same formula: make long-winded argument in which I try to claim that MLs are fascists and that the only true communism is post-leftism and left-communism. >(4) does not apply because I have actually tried to avoid hystericism at all costs and have not attempted to be needlessly offensive. Both are counterproductive to my intent. Yes, I have been polemical at times and my "ruthless criticism of all that exists" is indeed ruthless, but I will not be sorry for my commitment to critique, particularly critique of a Marxian character. The way in which you write here is itself hysterical. Everyone asked you to use a tripcode so that you can easily talk about whatever you want and any issues would be fixed, but you refused to. Reasonable debate is only possible when both sides are civil about it and don't call the other side fascist or anti-communist for not adhereing to your brand of individualist anarchism. >(5) does not apply because it is ludicrous to even suggest as much. On what fucking basis have I been "debating inherently reactionary topics where no reasonable debate is possible"? What fucking topic? I don't even know how to respond to this further because it literally has no basis in reality, even less so than the prior charges. Calling MLs fascists itself is a reactionary talking point where no reasonable debate is possible, as one side is antagonizing the other. >If all my detractors would just fucking ignore me and get over having their threads pristine and filtered into bubbles only they reside in -- in other words share this space -- this wouldn't happen. Again, we said that we just wanted to ignore you, which is why we were asking you to use a tripcode so that we can ignore you. Also, >The only reason why I have effectively commanded so much attention from this board, and have inadvertently shifted entire threads to focus on me (such as here), has everything to do with how much I stand out and how much so many of the petty manchildren despise that I do. No, your ideas do not stand out. Your ideas are so commonplace that we have created a board just to accomodate those ideas (>>>/dead/). Btw, how is "how much so many of the petty manchildren despise that I do" not violating (3)? You have been calling your critics "manchildren" in different posts before, how is that not mocking?
(75.59 KB 901x446 slurerino.jpg)
board is going to degrade even more
>>655229 Faggot nigger
>>655197 They said they don't want to create a thread about themselves because a thread about them is not board-subject-relevant Learn to read.
hello my fellow comrades! chapo refugee, here! i can't help but notice you're all using racial slurs. these are really problematic... you cannot call yourself a leftist if you don't adopt a more accepting culture. please make using slurs a bannable offense. i also notice you don't really have a safe space for trans people, women, blacks, latinos etc. i'm not any of those, but this is really bad, regardless. please keep this in mind going forward, otherwise you're no comrade of mine and you're not a real leftist. trans rights! i've already spread the link to this website all over the discord, so i hope you're all ready to welcome your fellow chapos! >>655265 wow real mature, mayoid
>>655267 then go to /dead/, make a thread that is board-subject-relevant. Simple.
>>655289 i know you're shitposting but you cause me physical pain nonetheless
>>655289 Not sure if weak bait or just joking, altough me personally I don't really like the use of slurs. They are bad optics.
(60.36 KB 908x449 slurerino.jpg)
>>655307 (me) World policing is dumb tough.
(220.60 KB 1558x968 wowgay.jpg)
why are they gay and not commies?
>>655308 unironically make slurs illegal for a week just so that niggerholics kts and I never have to see an overly performative anti-idpoler again
don't ban slurs, but make it filtered by default, oldfags can disable that option if they like. win win
>>655321 I support this, if only for the lulz it will create.
>>655329 filter nigger to uyghur
(5.39 KB 537x96 asddfasgh.png)
this is why we are irrelevant, we're not /pol/acks we should be attempting to incorporate normies, not push them away
>>655337 kek who was the autist
>>655308 Slurs are just casual speak on a casual board, no-one unironically uses "nigger" here you dope. Its literal shit-posting
>>655333 >glowuyghur Nah, nigger especially is one of those things where the word should be seen from time to time, both to help neutralize it through exposure and to spook anybody too liberal that they can't tolerate reading certain letter combinations.
>>655329 The last time they put filters on their choices were peak cringe.
>>655333 >trips >let it be done.
>>655337 fuck off Don't accommodate retards who enshrine the holy nigger word
>>655337 Based. Bye bye Chapoons.
woke: filter slurs to inoffensive words bespoke: filter inoffensive words to slurs
>>655337 yeah actually I agree, we're commies not edgee rightoids
>>655311 They are gay for their dads, so they don't have the daddy issues to become a commie
>>655358 woke: filter slurs to accommodate chapos bespoke: accommodate slurs to filter chapos
>>655346 4chan started the same way, we all were ironically being racist because it was edgy and no one was actually a nazi, it was just a good bit of fun. Unfortunately, being a place where you could say it attracted the unironic white supremacists which were more numerous than anticipated.
>>655356 spamming nigger to own the sjews honestly I would prefer spooked reddit commies to someone that puts this much value into the right to say nigger
>>655337 >>655356 I cast power word: nigger all black people are enslaved again and redditors banished
Now I want to filter nigger so that these faggots reeeeeee at the thought of not being able to say the word
>>655364 Saying a slur is not the same thing as being ironically racist. The word is a word. You can tell if the message is racist or not by reading and comprehending the message as a whole. /b/tards and /pol/yps weren't just saying slurs but actively propagating memes about niggas stealing bikes and shit.
>>655361 if only I was a faggot I could remain blissfully ignorant of this corrupt daddyless system
>>655365 >SJW is a dogwhistle for jew you people are the ones reading jews into things here
(738.58 KB 2276x1280 fpGcFbA.jpg)
ITT: People who are not mad at the n-word insist the people saying it are incredibly mad and as such it should be filtered to make them even more mad
yeah we know about the word nigger nobody cares, it's just a matter of appearance to a perfectly colonizable userbase which we are actively pushing away and into remaining chapofags forever or fully deradicalizing - you guys can handle not saying nigger for a week or two just to let them settle in atleast
>>653272 Reddit admins are employees. Reddit is capitalist.
>>655337 >this is why we are irrelevant, we're not /pol/acks we should be attempting to incorporate normies, not push them away >chapo >normie Oh I am laffin We absolutely should attempt to incorporate normies. I agree. That's why we should push back against political correctness and woke virtue signaling. Normies hate that shit. The only people who like it are the narcissists who use it to play power games and the kids from fundie households who find the rigid but contradictory behavioral codes familiar and comforting.
>>655385 yeah come one, how do you behave irl? lol
>>655389 There's no such thing as a normie. Get over this myth.
>>655389 They do, but I'm pretty sure normies aren't also comfortable saying the n word as well
>>655392 There may not be a person who is definitively a normie, but the term has a relative meaning with respect to a particular group. With respect to socialism or imageboards, it refers to people who are unfamiliar and instead used to more mainstream culture. To them, we are probably normies in another respect, in that they are in a subculture we are not.
>>655385 People don't trust giving them an inch because most of us have seen the absolute state of places like r/soc
>>655391 nothing remarkable except when advocating for socialism
>>655385 I would argue that the slur, nigger, should be banned for optics sake for the next two weeks. Faggot can stay though
>>655389 >We absolutely should attempt to incorporate normies. I agree. Oh do you? Great That's why we should push back against political correctness and woke virtue signaling. Normies hate that shit. No they don't. Most normies in most parts of the world are going to nope the fuck out when you say the n word, or rant about trans people or whatever.
(32.34 KB 949x750 racist captcha.jpg)
>>655394 They are ok with seeing it. Nobody forces people to post the word. It's not like >welcome to bunkerchan, to post you must complete the captcha
>>655402 Changing it to Uighur for two weeks would be funny and I'd be more amenable to that.
>>655403 >>655404 >Most normies in most parts of the world are going to nope the fuck out when you say the n word, bullshit, especially in a context where the message isn't racist >or rant about trans people or whatever. I agree the trans topic is alienating because it's two sides a lot of people are uncomfortable with, and it's got way less to do with class than race does. I don't see how this relates to people using slurs tbh
>bullshit, especially in a context where the message isn't racist delusional, you spend too much time on chans
>>655405 No they aren't lol. When they see the word, the first thought in their head will probably be "Oh no, this place is full of racist". You make it sound like people see this word in their daily occurrence. They don't. Especially the hard r. Just accept the fact that for most people, they don't like the word. Not everyone is super chanpilled as you.
>>655407 This. Jannies do this. It would also easily filter out all the MUH CHIYNUHHH redditors, and let the ones that can leave the propaganda behind through.
>>655407 somebody post this to gulag, this is funny shit
>>655417 You spend too much time around native speakers of English
>>655418 >ga vs hard r distinction imagine having a social circle where people think this matters >>655417 maybe you spend too much time around losers >>655407 This is pretty good though.
(22.63 KB 238x392 Capture.PNG)
>>655337 laffin at you getting yikesed by r/MTC tbqh
(5.25 KB 243x207 uhh.jpg)
>>655431 nobody in my social circles cares that much, but only because i'm only friends with other socialists or just people who are apathetic in general >>655429 most of the people in my area are not native speakers of english seriously go say nigger in a completely non-racist context to a bunch of normies and look at the all the positive reception you'll get also we're talking about chapofags specifically in this context anyway, not just normies in general and chapofags almost certainly don't like the word
>>655431 >imagine having a social circle where people think this matters You mean 99% of people. Now I know you're a retard who spends all his time on chans and discord or some shit, with no social skills living off his parents, because you clearly don't know what the fuck the real world is like if you think dropping the word nigger anywhere near anyone who isn't super internetpilled is normal.
>>655441 >seriously go say nigger in a completely non-racist context to a bunch of normies and look at the all the positive reception you'll get saying nigger in person vs saying it on an imageboard are wildly different things my dude >>655442 99% of people don't care how you end the n word, either thinking it's racist both ways or just not caring in general. >if you think dropping the word nigger anywhere near anyone who isn't super internetpilled is normal We're talking about posting the word on this website. Why are you (both) bringing IRL into this?
>>655453 >saying nigger in person vs saying it on an imageboard are wildly different things my dude yeah but my point is that while we are attempting to recruit normies and chapofags we should be considering that such language isn't the best for appearances
Also the word nigger has a pretty negative connotation to it, so seeing it spammed frequently in a thread doesn't really encourage productive discussion or anything.
i just realised that the banning of chapo is our primitive accumulation, better enclose the chapos, so that we can rise as the biggest leftist board ever
>>655463 Last person that did this was banned lol
>>655441 >seriously go say nigger in a completely non-racist context to a bunch of normies and look at the all the positive reception you'll get Already done eg. Women is the nigger of men White trash are just white niggers The N-word is just the upperclass's way of saying nigger Went fine Have your balls dropped yet kid?
>>655464 yup if we want to grow in influence and radicalize normies further we should be hoovering them up, mtc included
>>655464 yup if we want to grow in influence and radicalize normies further we should be hoovering them up, mtc included
>>655463 >>655459 How often do people say it? I don't see it much. I've seen it more in just this conversation than this past week probably.
>>655468 who did you say this to lol >>655464 Sophisticated Accumulation o_o
>>655471 not that often but these fags want to drive away potential new members to preserve their little secret club so they're going monky
>>655472 Primitive accumulation uses primitive as in original or early, not simple. Not that it can't happen later in history, just that it's the first time those resources enter the domain of Capital.
>>655479 m8 I'm in favor of allowing slurs and I'm 99% sure I've posted fewer slurs than the people arguing to filter the slurs
Isn't it funny that the people talk about how nigger is just a word and it doesn't mean anything. But as soon as we thought about filtering it to another equally meaningless word, they go batshit crazy to keep it
Reminder that filtering slurs won't do anything about already existing posts, and volunteers will have to manually edit those if you don't want virgin chapo eyes to see the stinky poopoo words.
>>655487 Tbh your repeated insistence everyone is mad as fuck really makes me think your anus is pretty much prolapsed at this point
>>655490 >volunteers will have to manually edit those if you don't want virgin chapo eyes to see the stinky poopoo words. Even better. Make the Jannies actually do something on this website
>>655487 yeah really though, why do they need to say the word so bad >>655490 I think a temporary word filter itself is fine enough negate retards spamming slurs to try and drive away new members
>>655487 Filtering a word for being bad is giving it special treatment. It encourages people to use the word to be edgy and cool. It's easy to circumvent, e.g. n i g g e r. It creates an association between edginess and the word instead of deflating its significance. This is the dialectic that happens every time you try to censor something, aka the Streisand Effect.
>>655487 the underlying resentment is that channers have to relinquish a part of chan culture to accomodate redditors. it sucks but i'm also not 17 anymore so whatever we can filter it.
>>655494 nah I ain't mad, just pointing out the obvious
>>655505 >>655507 Well either the censor works for a couple of weeks with some amusing side effects or we enter a new era of slurposting, shitposting and ban evasion.
>>655512 You're so mad, you've pretty much turned into a mental patient. Calm down!
>>655514 The next couple of weeks are going to be very, VERY interesting... We've witnessed the crackdown start on Reddit. Supposedly in a few days the crackdown on Youtube will begin...
>>655512 Then why was it me one of the it's just a word gang the one who posted the filter suggestion to the admin board /gulag/?
>>655505 Whats the other option. We don't filter it, people spam it to be edgy because "ma reddit bad" and we lose potential people
>>655517 I got mad cow disease
>>655523 Keep your prions to yourself.
>>655518 isn't the YouTube crackdown supposed to start tomorrow? i'm going to binge prolekult just in case lel
>>655520 I am also one of those posters and I made the post that got linked in the suggestion lol
>>655518 Molymeme already got dabbed on, though. Is there more, coming?
>>655520 cause its a funny idea
>>655507 >the underlying resentment is that channers have to relinquish a part of chan culture to accomodate redditors. I get that, I moreso think it might be necessary to counteract spam directed at newfriends, and maybe we would see less performative slurs awkwardly inserted into conversation.
>>655487 I will fight back if vols think of taking way my precious retard
>>655536 Nah we can keep retard. Nigger is the bigger issue.
>>655526 Im practically the joker and you my friend are batman. Im like a dog chasing its tail, I don't know what I would do if I caught it
>>655536 It will be our leftpol moment
>>655541 um.... sweaty..... dont use the r slur.... it's ableist...
>>655435 >If you're anti-PC you hve too be right-wing Yeah nah, fuck off. Communism's founders were people who expressly said "fuck it" to the liberal feels of the time, and anyone who is going to bitch about this is a Jewish nigger like Lassalle.
>>655545 >sweaty Yikes, thats ableist against people who have sweat gland problems. Im going to have to report you to the cancel police to #CancelAnon
>>651256 Such a high quality thread. I can already see the chaponiggers have come in full force. fuck off back to reddit we're full
>>655545 Even less people like the retard scolds than people who don't want you to say nigger. Retard has always been treated as a less bad word. It's literally a common insult among kids.
>>655546 Funny how r/MTC claims to be against ableism, yet didn't protest the admin's fatshaming of Big Chungus.
im gibbbon motherfucker
(61.85 KB 1280x720 adam.jpg)
Cool adam here, whats up leftypol
God I want to go back in time and stop the creator of Tumblr.
>>655435 Honestly all of this seems fine to me. I've never seen anyone there be banned for saying retard or whatever
(1.17 MB 480x269 Now get over it.gif)
Attention PC fags Chan old-fag here. I was around since leftypol first appeared on 8ch and was using 4chan before /pol/ became a stormnigger hide-out. This should go without saying but Bunkerchan is also a chan. Chans are coarse, naughty and free in what/how people get to talk, whether the majority here approves of this is a different matter, but things like slurs are standard fare of this site and without actual derogatory context, they are just words without mcuh weight. We are anonymous and thus everyone could be a 'spic' or a 'wop' or a 'gook' or a 'kike' or a 'cracker' or a 'nigger', and no-one fucking cares because no-one actually knows who we really are, without Doxxing, (illegal here). We are just voices without known faces. If you are a Chapo immigrant then you must accept this, because we are NOT reddit, and should not have to abide by your rules. YOU came to us, not the otherway around. If you're this sensitive, make another subreddit and leave. Otherwise, accept chan-'culture' and learn to adapt.
>>655557 then the radlib tumblrinas would shit up every other website. they need a fucking containment zone just like redditards and chaponiggers do
>>655561 chaponiggers fuck off
(91.70 KB 1200x946 cyborg with tuburculosis.jpg)
>>655555 Nice waste of quint fives, cunt
chaponiggers stay <3 <3 xxx :D :-) (: (=<
>>655565 no. for every chapo that you spook off I will suck one dick to win them back.
>>655566 chaponigger found. fuck off gibbon hater
>>655561 To quote a GDR anon, "Imagine frequenting a board whose sole purpose is to be edgy, and then having the gall to complain about another board's members being too coarse for your delicate sensibilities. I hope you break both of your wrists falling down a flight of stairs so that you can't shitpost or jack off for a straight month. Please, in all sincerity, just stop breathing; you are worth exponentially less than the infinitely replaceable oxygen you spend on existing. ''Fuck you and your entire board of fragile manchildren, and please. come again soon.""
>>655572 >Chaponigger who cares about GETS are you confused?
>>655574 kek, saving that copypasta
>>655577 Don't you dare think to dox me. I am prepared to engage in a protracted dick sucking war to win back the whole of chapo cum townhouse
whats this happo chappo trappo house thing
>>655623 radlibs seething reddit banned them.
>>655623 I heard that the notorious sex pest nick mullen owns that house
>>655623 Banned subreddit that has now splintered all over the place.
(396.40 KB 1536x2048 EQE7-uoXUAEvIXN.jpg-large.jpg)
To All Chapos: Virgil is best Chapo, don't @ me
>>655639 Felix is the best if only because he's the most consistently funny Matt was entertaining until he started livestreaming his quarantine-induced psychosis
>>655679 Don't you dare diss the CushVlogs
This has become the filtration thread where we take the immigrants and convert them to leftypol and get rid of the radlibs.
>>655686 I normally like what Matt has to say, but if I wanna see some unwashed guy rant at me about opening my third eye or some shit, I'd just go look for homeless people in Santa Cruz
>>655693 I don't know what you've been watching, all of Matt's streams have been a lot more grounded than "third eye opening" nonsense or whatever woo you are insinuating
>>655715 after it became clear that Bernie was done for, he went off the deep end for a while.
>>655639 most attractive I'll give you that, but only because he's asian
>>655734 Is he actually asian?
>>655736 With those eyes I have to assume so, or at least finnish. but I repeat myself
>>655743 fuck off, finns don't get to be called asian after the hyperwar
>>655403 >or rant about trans people or whatever. i guarantee you that a vast majority of the world population are weirded out by trannies (while not caring too much about them to die on some TERF hill)
Ban every last one of the chapotards that flee here, we don't need any of them.
>>655807 glowie
>>653334 Most of them are still supportive of the protests tho. Unlike most "leftist" (radlib) subreddits, stupidpol doesn't ban people for having the wrong opinion.
>>655794 or turned on
>>655639 >>655679 no better than weebs arguing over waifus or kpop cunts. Fuck off parasocial faggots.
>>655807 >>655814 obvious stupidpoler please shut the fuck up, reddit drama is divisive and sectarian and does not belong in a chan
>>655679 >Felix is the best if only because he's the most consistently funny I used to think he was funny and I still do to an extent but he usually just recycles the same three bits over and over and it's starting to get somewhat stale. It also often interrupts the flow of the conversation when everybody has to be silent for two minutes while Felix finishes one of his riffs about weird names or whatever.
(3.38 MB 310x310 1593111641203.gif)
>>653851 Wait what? Seriously? That was the best fucking sub ever! Something has to be done about this, those bastards can't just delete r/BigChungus and get away with it
we should filter "glowie" to "russian bot" or "wumao" or something while we're at it
>>655872 filter it to Cheka
>>655872 We need to spam the glowing stick figure hundreds of times at the newcomers obviously. If we don't, the chapos will win!
>>655872 "$10" is better
>>654064 >>654110 >>654159 >>654193 >>654268 >>654367 >>654399 Can the jannies just ban this pretentious, narcissistic faggot already? He derails every fucking thread he's in with his pseudo-intellectual screeds
(843.30 KB 2048x2027 lqvih72czn751.jpg)
I checked cth2 shortly before it was banned and thought this was funny. I'm surprised reddit revived this old meme.
>>654694 They get bombarded with "gtfo nigger" posts because people are fucking tired of him and know he can't be reasoned with. If you try to criticize him, he just calls you a reactionary or a troll or an anticommunist or a /pol/lack or any of his other stock responses.
>>655049 >No you have not. It is fascist to try to silence someone using hegemonic psychiatric tools of social control because it relies on stratification, organism, paranoia, and conformity to hegemonic normative conceptions of identity. Read Deleuze, specifically Anti-Oedipus and Capitalism and Schizophrenia Literal word salad
>>655904 symptom of schizophrenia
>>653698 Lmao good bait lad
>>655895 what's the original watchtower analogy about again? I remember seeing that drawing of a prison but I forget the context.
>>654058 >hosted in albania lmfao I hope this becomes a recurring meme for all the newfags who flood in
one day, leftypol.su will exist
(3.89 KB 130x128 88.jpg)
We are now faster than any of the boards on 8kun or any of the splinter refugee 8chan forums. Have we surpasses the smaller 4chan boards in terms of speed? Where can I find the PPH for them?
>>655561 Kinda cringe that you value chan culture over actually advancing any organized left wing movement
>>655930 It's the panopticon, popularized by Foucault.
>>655940 >We are now faster than any of the boards on 8kun We reached that point a few months ago
>>655945 For 4chan boards, I know how to find it on this site.
>>655950 I visited a (real, still active) jail once because of my job and it was a piece of shit jail from the 1900s built in a panopticon. The crazy thing is that the entire building is under a "cultural heritage" rule and therefore is not allowed to change. The exterior looks the same exact way it did in the 1900s and the cells are small as shit too.
>>655942 >over actually advancing any organized left wing movement chapofags shitting up threads because of retarded sperging over words is not "advancing any organized left wing movement" though
>>655942 How does chan culture harm actually advancing any organized left wing movement? If anything PC culture is what harms it.
>>655963 Being so insistent about culture generally is an issue, but aversion to using racial slurs is much more defensible to every day people than using them casually and regularly. >>655961 You wouldn't be so defensive of chan culture if this weren't just a form of entertainment for you.
>>655970 >gets request to change nigger to uighur put in >immediately starts asking for more This is literally the reason why nobody ever wants to give you faggots a single request btw
>>655970 >aversion to using racial slurs is much more defensible to every day people than using them casually and regularly. STOP RUINING THE CHANCES FOR SOCIALISM IN AUSTRALIA
oh my god, shut up. Have two weeks of filtering nigger to another word and then have two weeks of filtering every curse into nigger. After those two period are done, we have no filters and everyone can shut the fuck up
>>655942 >value chan culture Nigga, no-one is saying use slurs IRL. But you're ON a CHAN so expecting it to play nice is like expecting an attack dog to behave like a puppy. >advancing any organized left wing movement Except that we do that as well. We're the online equivalent of a bunch of ordinary people sitting in the dark corner of a pub, smoking and drinking while cracking semi-private jokes and using swears and slurs indiscriminately in the comfort away from open public eye, while also discussing topics and planning future actions; raids on 4/pol/ to trigger them, helping take down alt-right youtube channels and twitter accounts, spreading debunks and whistleblowing pedos on social media and organizing.
>>655956 >under a "cultural heritage" rule and therefore is not allowed to change Then it shouldn't be an actual prison. I get the cultural heritage thing, but you can't just continue to have it active at the same fucking time, the logistics of it are retarded.
>>655934 Post this on r/FULLCOMMUNISM and r/communism... I'm going to enjoy the fireworks as idpol floods this fucking board.
>>655892 He's a Tor-faggot s he can't be banned thankfully he's left for now. He will be back, last time he was here, he did the same thing but in regards to defending pedos... I have a sneaking suspicion that he's actual Steven Pinkman, judging by his excessive wordiness and pedo-loving.
>>656026 >>655983 Some children on this board are excited to have new friends and for some fucking reason, can't stop saying the word "nigger" ever since they got here. I guess they want to show the newfriends that they can say the no-no american word without getting into trouble, but come the fuck on!
(55.16 KB 640x627 EZeZOg9VAAEx598.jpeg)
>>654110 God-tier bait. black flags never disappoint
>>655970 >You wouldn't be so defensive of chan culture I honestly dgaf, I'm fine with filtering it (it makes polyps look silly), I just find your arguments dishonest. this is a chan, anonymous neets call each other mean words, it is not intended to be a normie breadpiling platform, a clean propaganda machine, because it's a fucking chan. The ones we can breadpill are other autistics chan users >value chan culture dunno if I "value" it, it's how it is due to anonymity and edginess, and going on cultural war over it is retarded waste of time side note, discussing the word remind me of that anectdote "“It was Fred’s work that led to the formation of the Young Patriots Party (YPP), a revolutionary party of poor redneck white Appalachian youth whose symbol was a confederate flag with a red star emblazoned on it. Fred’s approach was to appeal to class instead of being sidetracked by race. He walked into a redneck Hillbilly bar in Chicago. When they asked, ‘What are you doing here?’ he said, ‘I’m here to organize the Niggers.’ They said, ‘No Niggers come in here,’ and were ready to fight. He said, ‘Oh yeah? Well the way I see it, they work y’all like Niggers, treat y’all like Niggers, and make y’all live like Niggers. So that makes y’all Niggers in my book, and I say it’s time to get organized and deal with this shit!’”"
>>655814 Supporting protests does not automatically make you a comrade. Liberals support that shit too, they're not our friends.
broke: saying the n-word woke: not saying the n-word bespoke: having the same conversation about saying the n-word for over 24 hours
>>656048 they also support the riots, something liberals don't support
>>656029 >>656026 Ironic that people are discussing the limitations of preserving cultural heritage in the same thread others are defending the use of slurs because teenagers on 4chan liked to say them in the mid 2000s.
>>656041 >some children <using nigger Go back you absolute mong. Better yet, read >>655561 and Lurk Moar >come the fuck on Go to >>>/GET/ for that, we're not going to bukkake you. >>655970 >wouldn't be so defensive of chan culture if this weren't just a form of entertainment for you. You don't fucking say!? We're ON a chan, we like how its run and it belongs to us. Newfags either grow a thicker skin or leave, we're not here to baby you, we're here to be casual and discuss without pissing ourselves over stupid slurs when no-body except trolls use them in actual racial context.
>>655942 saying nigger and other slurs to each other is purely a chan thing. It is understood that these words must not be said outside. Calling a black man a nigger for being black is a bannable offense btw. Same as calling gay people faggots, etc. We have people from all over the world, with all the LGBT+ colors represented, and all the spectrum of autism as well, and of course, all the skin colors too. All slurs used here are re-appropriated.
>>656061 Thank you for getting this thread back on topic, we all needed a bit more nigger debate in our lives.
Been loving the takes from previous r/cth users on various subreddits since it got banned. "The hosts of the show just hated the subreddit because they're thin skinned and couldn't handle our epic criticism from the left, the sub was actually way more radical than the show!"
>>656054 The riots are cringe marauders acting like a bunch of loose canon looters. The only part of the riots that made sense was their assault on the Police Station everything else was just pure cringe. And they're cowards too considering that anyone who actually defended their property was left alone, such as the Russian cafe.
>>656070 Based stupidpol retard
>>656061 >a prison from the 1900s still operating even when it shouldn't is the same as Chans retaining the consistency of allowing slurs to be used freely Get out of here fag.
>>656047 >normie breadpiling platform That is what is needed right now if reddit, twitter, and facebook are going to become (even more) unusable. >anecdote You do need to meet people where they are to some extent, but most of us should know better by now.
(125.39 KB 262x187 blacked bleached cancer.gif)
>>656067 All we need is BLM faggots to come and start screeching about whitey and the picture will be complete.
>>654367 mucho texto
>>656051 >having the same conversation about saying the n-word for over 24 hours Feels more like over the last 24 years.
>>656064 >It is understood that these words must not be said outside That undermines the usefulness of this website as a platform. A publicly accessible left wing discussion board cannot have this level of ambient hostility.
>>656072 Cry harder, looting is not revolutionary. Those kinds of riots are being LET happen because porky gets a nice bit of insurance profit out of it, the poor people who's shops get trashed are pushed away from revolutionary ideals and the rioters get to let out steam, letting everything return to statusquo within a year and porky gets off scott free.
>>656084 Cool theory bro guess we'll just have to wait and see for Bernie 2024
>>656081 >undermines the usefulness of this website as a platform Idiot check any of the threads outside this one and you won't find slurs used constantly outside of banter and shitposts. >A publicly accessible left wing discussion board cannot have this level of ambient hostility We're hostile because if we weren't /pol/ would have sunk us by now.
>>656090 >If you're not supporting aimless rioters smashing windows, you're a liberal Radlibs are cancer.
>>656081 If anything, the open hostility towards eachother is the true critical communism that the left needed all these decades. Marx was a critic, and platforms were all that mattered all along.
>>656093 >outside of banter and shitposts That's my point. >/pol/ would have sunk us If you did not use racially charged language actual racists would take over?
>>656081 It is unfortunate yes, but the freedom of speech lets people run loose with ideas. you know, i tell you, dirty things, fuck your mother, piece of shit, etc. Ok, but now we can discuss real theory. I fuck your sister, but have you considered the ontological claim that you are making here?
>>656096 Those barricade provocateurs/kiddos were of a different breed than today's anticorporate looters.
>>656096 >not muh heckin businerinos!
>>656112 Who needs job opportunities or a municipal tax base?
>>656121 Nothing funnier than watching you permacucks devolve from muh smol businesses to muh local minimum wage job opportunities in real time
>>656112 Most of those businesses were small-time establishments made by people who aren't even middle-class and took out loans to start a small business or CoOp. These aren't just Wendy's and McDonalds being trashed, and even if they were, that's still just fucking looting. Its behaving like a bunch of savage apes. That's not protest, that's just pure anarchy. Even fucking Occupy Wallstreet had better organization than this.
>>656102 >If you did not use racially charged language actual racists would take over If we pussy-footed around about every little thing that could offend us. We DON'T get offended by anything and so they have to try harder to bait us.
>>656133 >hurr if you don't like looters attacking ordinary people and letting corporations make money off of that, you're a cuck Good god go back to /pol/ you poor-hating faggot.
>>656134 >behaving like a bunch of savage apes Cool it with the racist language
>>656134 Both the much mourned Autozone and Target have the same majority shareholder and it's a hedge fund you disingenuous social democratic faggot. >>656145 Go back to stupidpol you seething Sanders voter.
>>656133 Okay? Until such time as there is a better alternative, people need those jobs to exist. If pharmacies and grocery stores go out of business or close locations in response to what happened, that would be absolutely disastrous. None of this is to criticize peaceful protestors though, who are mostly separate from looters and have a good cause.
>>656134 Proletarization of the petit bourgeoisie is a good thing.
>>656161 The only thing peaceful protesters are useful for is taking rubber bullets to the face.
>>656167 peaceful protesters may be bastards but they at least keep up the pressure and wear them down for night gang
(175.44 KB 1280x720 Black Friday 2.jpg)
>>656150 >Autozone and Target LOL nice nonsequitur. You do realize that malls are not the only places being looted right you dolt? What hedge-funds do local cafes have? the 30,000+ bank loan the owners took out to buy the property? Looting is not revolutionary its just people behaving like animals. They fight each other over petty commodities like starved apes fighting over rotten fruit an abusive zookeeper tosses them. All those apple phones and laptops looted? Useless, apple has a killswitch that turns them useless and lets them track each device down and quietly arrest the thief and retrieve their phone or laptop. The same applies for a ton of other things since no-one got rid of the CCTV systems. So good job at ruining your own revolutionary potential.
>>656149 White and black people are taking part in the looting, this has nothing to do with race.
>>656133 >muh bsuiness Who do you think was part of the French Revolution you cad?
>>656161 > people need those jobs to exist. clearly they're not sufficient right now if unemployed people keep rioting the streets lol. the issue is thinking that the rioting is done by aunt tifa doing a heckin statement when it was a spontaneous violent outlet
>>656175 I hope your small business gets bombed tbqh >>656178 lol too obvious
>>656167 How do you think the 1917 revolution started you dopey faggot? It started off with PEACEFUL protests, and when they pressured the government to force them into violent reprisal, that's when the revolution began and how they focused it against the czar instead of wasting it on attacking small-business bystanders.
>>656181 So what's the alternative? Everyone become a subsistence farmer? Supermarkets and small grocery stores, which are already very low margin businesses, were looted. Food deserts are already a real problem. If you want to be rid of these workplaces for good then you need to provide an alternative, and right now there isn't one, for either workers or consumers.
this truly feels like the end of an era https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqSU9o-PuCU this song already feels oddly nostalgic, now
>>656186 Holy shit why had nobody thought of just killing the King of capitalism, you're a genius my dude!
(7.71 MB poppoppop.mp4)
>>656173 I miss night gang.
>>656190 > So what's the alternative? beats the fuck out of me, i'm just saying the rioting will continue as long as the crisis drags on, or trump launches a violent counter-response and probably even then, and all your small business moralizing will do jack shit to stop it.
>>656184 You're a retard, for real. >>656181 >reddit spacing This explains it, you're definitely a chapotard. Your attitude makes me think that you're definitely some lower-middle-class radlib LARPer who has no idea what being homeless is actually like but thinks they do, because they ran away from home at 12 for a single night Also BTW, what small business do the homeless have? Because I suppose you have a justification as to why these riotfags burn down their tents and mattresses.
>>656198 >the rioting will continue as long as the crisis drags on I know. There's nothing I can do about it, but I do not think it should be encouraged or focused on at the expense of demands to end racist policing.
>>656201 >REEEE >REEEEE >REEEEEE Just because an advertisement was posted on stupidpol doesn't mean anyone here wants to listen to your faggotry.
>>656201 >>reddit spacing it's like i'm back on 4chan lol, this is asinine. make a worthwhile post or don't reply, dumbass
>>656201 >retard >chapotard There are so many other words out there for you to use Amusing to see this website devolve into two people each calling the other middle class tho lmao
>>656194 The Czar and his establishment are now replaced by capitalists and their biggest figures; Gates, Musk, Soros, etc. and their upper management. Not the ordinary people. DO you know how horrible it is to be a Salesman? Certainly as bad as being a fry-cook at a McDonalds, just the pay is symbollically higher... and so are your taxes and the things you have to buy, because unless you're one of the 1% you're still being fucked over. It's not just ghetto people who are exploited by capital you idiot.
(8.48 MB I9QUeHK.mp4)
>>656195 /gibbongang/ is best
>>653688 I don't want to live in this world anymore
>>656198 >beats the fuck out of me <I'm just going talk shit and provide no alternatives then keep your mouth shut. >rioting will continue as long as the crisis drags on Which is prolonged by.... Porky. You guys are literally walking into their hands. The net gains they get far exceed any minor commodity losses, especially since they have INSURANCE which gives them an EXTRA bit of profit. >>656207 Cry harder bitchass, you're the idiot who came here, not the otherway around. >>656210 >make a worthwhile post The pot calling the kettle black redditspacer. Your argument is literally "hurr fugg business, riot!!!!" with absolutely no direction whatsoever.
>>653688 >Redditors should be executed alongside their families yikes
>>656201 >lower-middle-class radlib LARPer this is probably some self hating middle class suburban kid shit, the middle class is literally half of the US population you fucking larpers, you will not gain workerist points by dividing the proles
>>656226 >I'm just going talk shit and provide no alternatives In all fairness, some of the looters themselves have no alternatives because they cannot work and need some income. Many people don't even qualify for unemployment insurance. It's just a bad situation to be in all around.
>>656212 >o many other words out there for you to use Radlibs are not even worth the time for me to get inventive. But as an FYI, I've been below the Poverty line all my life, I know how shit a ghetto is, and aI also hate when some aimless motherfuckers decide to trash a neighbor hood, to loot it, while pretending to be doing to for a 'noble cause'. Its like the Crusaders attacking Constantinople, to own the muslims.
>>653688 Fuck off Sakaist
>>654582 Im not reading that
>>656222 There there son, you're not a r*dditor anymore, you're one of us now https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U06jlgpMtQs
Finally bumplocked
>>656233 What did any of that have to do with Sakaism?
>>656226 >I'm just going talk shit and provide no alternatives i don't see anyone forming any vanguard here lol. like you imbeciles are sectarians over social fucking networks, it's non-sensical to have sensible conversations when you're already submerged in an idpol struggle over who posts where. might as well do console wars too.
>>656230 >some of the looters themselves have no alternatives because they cannot work and need some income. That's fine, but when I see some gold-tooth-crowned dickhead with gold chains start stealing shit from a store I want to know those fillings out of his teeth. He has the money for those fucking things he doesn't want to work, or care about other people/workers, he just wants to get free shit. >Many people don't even qualify for unemployment insurance. Including me, I'm still not going to steal shit from a store. Why do you think Robin Hood only stole from the rich? Because his story appeals that way, he takes money from those who stole it in the first place, not from other poor people trying to get by.
>>656235 Good, he's a shitposter pretending to be smart.
(394.00 KB 734x2882 BLM.jpg)
>>656246 >don't see anyone forming any vanguard here lo Because A) its a radlib movement lead by CIA direct radlibs who think white people aren't human (pic related) B) This is no longer a protest, its just a bunch of aimless looters, there is nothing to work with except an angry mob who isn't listening >ou imbeciles are sectarians over social fucking network Nope, we might clash over "authority" or "if the USSR was socialist or not" but that has nothing to do with present day organization >non-sensical to have sensible conversations when you're already submerged in an idpol struggle How is this idpol you dimwit? We don't like reddit because you're largely radlibs with a chip on your shoulder who don't want to hear a word against your beliefs. r/communism and Chapo have banned leftypol talking points, so now we laugh as you get banned yourselves.
>>656272 "Humxns"
>>656246 >you're already submerged in an idpol struggle over who posts where it's important to protect board culture. honestly i don't have a very good view of subreddits like chapotraphouse or stupidpol. a cursory view of stupidpol here -- https://www.reddit.com/r/stupidpol/comments/hismp2/youre_a_trump_supporter_if_you_dont_think_100k/ https://www.reddit.com/r/stupidpol/comments/hiuhg5/the_right_cant_think_in_terms_of_systems_the_left/ reveals the reactionary nature of the board and i honestly think stupidpolyps and chapofags are equally toxic. at least the chapofags seem less aggressive than the stupidpolyps.
(140.63 KB 1026x1026 I can't niggers.png)
Can we go back to talking about slurs now? That was more fun.
>>656277 >it's important to protect board culture. I think it's a carry over from 4chan rather than a legitimate concern, actually. It is a means of expressing an attachment to a tenuous yet existing belonging to a subculture i.e. identity. And frankly either you set out to conserve the chan culture but drop all pretense of ever achieving anything else except being a nazi-less chan to shoot the shit (which is fine, actually) or compromise chan culture but continue pretending to be an alternative venue to reddit and twitter. I dunno, this thread just hit bump limit, but it having these kind of conversations already feels like a regression from something that was already kinda fucking shit.
>>655337 The word "Nigger" only has as much power as you choose to give it. And forbidding its use only gives it power. I would take the other approach an use semantic satiation to rob it of its power, apply it to everyone, if everyone is a nigger then nobody is a nigger.
>>655459 Trying to recruit normies via imagboards is a lost cause, chans always have and always will always be outside the realm of normiedom.
>>655863 Nigger are you fucking retarded? Not wanting radlib reddit trannies here doesn't make you a glowie, get the fuck out of here newfag.
>>655848 What the fuck is a stupidpoler? Ban all the redditors for all I care, we dont need anymore fucking radlibs here, and chapos are the biggest radlibs around.
>>656163 No it isn't, that's what leads to fascism.
>>656425 No it fucking doesn't. Stop hating people you don't even know.
>>655561 saved
>>656280 i loled
(1.87 MB 480x264 zXAA3CV.gif)
>>656253 >That's fine, but when I see some gold-tooth-crowned dickhead with gold chains start stealing shit from a store I want to know those fillings out of his teeth. He has the money for those fucking things he doesn't want to work, or care about other people/workers, he just wants to get free shit.
>>656272 FUCOJIN G hwite ngi9ersd yhey ruend th eworld thery made the jew world order the ultra wsutvalioan systm to root oot comunsismsksy asnd the jeiwsh nigger hitlerite WOLD ODOR THER ASTRM THE HUAMNM TRRAtiors AND NMUST BE PUNSUIGHESD mao wrtoe i nhis boook tghat whte """poerplre""" (aka hwite ngietrs) R THE SUBN BHYUMANS HE SDAID 'tghe wehuiterm manm isd nkgfger andf mopstetr ctratire and msuts be detrdatoryed bgy using soul power" sould pqwoer is abtained from, the . ultera opwers of the gratrestr gods ever, they gods fightring the jew nighar hitler and even th esubnhuman niger frend og heilter fukicnhg japan niger with pwoetr of stalin he wipe cv elan tyhe niger maneace of world, but parasicte remian. the cosmisc stalinite powterer muost be restsb;lish, as mentione in yo pictar. th e whyte nigahr was subhkman, generttic defencit and ungod mutation of the vgreat satan americah poop fuckerss. kalr msaxr ewas blakc anf patr of matsr race of blacks. white niggers paint themselves as mustrer race and rip rap rop destroy everytung like the gwraet xzimbabwe And inca EMPRIE (COMUNSIMSKY) by dtrwestorying the advancerd tecbhnolohy, and by burngin everybthing don to grOND THIS ISD THE RACE EWASR NOW THE KILL IS NOW RACE WAR BETWEEN RACE MASTERS BLACK OVERHUMANS AND WHITE NIGGER JEWS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE NIGGER HITLERS AND JAPAN NIGGER CHIANG KAI SHIT PUPPTET IN KOMITNANFG. comunsim is black and MAO SUPORT THE BALCKS IN THE RAFE WAR. We are in RACE WAR OF COMJUNISMKY ITS US (BLACKS, MAO, COMMUNISM, OVERHUMANS, STALIN MARX AND UTLRA PWOER) VS THE HITLER NIGGER FUCKTION (HITLER, NIGGERJAPAN, KMT PUPPT BACKD BY US NIGGER BURGERS, ANTI STALIN ANTI MAO """"cOMMUNITS""" AND WHITE NJUGER) WE WIL KIL YOU WITH COSMINC PWOER AND POSADAS ULTRA NUKES NUKING UR WHITE NIGGTR ASSES . . THE KILLIG POWER ALL HELP OF COMMUNISMS AND WORKERS WIL KIL YOU WHIOT NIGGER SKUMK HITLER NIGGER FSAGGOTS WE WILL WINFOREVER
>>656504 What the fuck
>>655149 Based.
>>656504 based schizo poster
>>656433 What??? Are you retarded or something?
>>656277 I swear people who constantly talk up stupidpol need to shut the fuck up once and for all.
>>656985 People think they are based because they are "anti idpol" but in reality they are pro right-wing idpol and cucked succdems.
>>656606 Samefag spotted >>656919 No, but you are apparently.
(366.99 KB 937x528 based.jpg)
Hello friends. How long is reasonable for a nigger-uyghur word filter? Discuss. http://www.strawpoll.me/20480270
>>656029 >Then it shouldn't be an actual prison. I get the cultural heritage thing, but you can't just continue to have it active at the same fucking time, the logistics of it are retarded. Well that's the autism of German bureaucracy for you...(it's a "maximum security" prison in Germany).
>>657674 >That last option though Nicely done.
>>656068 >The hosts of the show just hated the subreddit because they're thin skinned and couldn't handle our epic criticism from the left I mean, that doesn't apply to Matt and Felix because everyone loved them. And Amber and Vigil actually do have thick skin. But Will Menaker really is a namesearching thin-skinned baby who felt bullied because some teenage redditer did the dab on him once.
>>653801 I just want one to cuddle with me and tell me I'm not as bad as I think I am, that I'm capable of being a good person, etc.

Delete
Report

no cookies?