/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

Proletariat without Borders

catalog
Mode: Reply
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8192

Files

Max file size: 20.00 MB

Max files: 3

Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules


/leftypol/ is a non-sectarian board for leftist discussion.

IRC: Rizon.net #bunkerchan
https://qchat.rizon.net/?channels=bunkerchan

(56.71 KB 540x540 85557222.jpg)
(183.15 KB manifesto.pdf)
Rules, Moderation and Manifesto Feedback. Anonymous Board volunteer 01/08/2020 (Wed) 09:46:23 No. 203786
REMINDER TO VISIT >>>/hobby/ Don't: -spam -post cuckshit, "commies BTFO," or any of that kind of shit -post any porn depicting underage (including drawings) -attempt to cloak reactionary politics in left-wing rhetoric (Strasserism, "Nazbol" Strasserism, National "Socialism," Zionism, "Die cis scum"/"Kill all white men" SJW shit) -incite specific acts of terrorism or similar acts (use your head, don't act like a fed) -post idpol Do: -be respectful, ask questions, and know your place if you're a reactionary -feel free to flame, shitpost, and be sectarian if you are a leftist (just keep it somewhat within reason) If you think that the mod team hasn't responded to your request in a satisfactory manner or that it was ignored, you can now contact us directly at [email protected] Comatoast, the vol who kindly proposed this, checks this email account everyday day but might not respond immediately due to work. You can check any activity on this board, including the activity of the mod team (ban, deletions, etc...) here : https://bunkerchan.xyz/logs.js?boardUri=leftypol You can find the manifesto in a pdf appended to this post /GET/ is Bunkerchan's general/shitposting board and /ref/ its international board. leftybooru https://lefty.booru.org/index.php Meta Discussion: Extraordinary Commission For Bunker Affairs: >>>/gulag/768 Development of Bunkerchan: >>>/gulag/3941
Edited last time by antious666 on 01/22/2020 (Wed) 16:49:23.
>>223974 It was somewhat obvious, tbh.
>>223974 Those are literally all my own posts, including the ones you didn't list. Why are you this autistic?
>>223976 >t. Sage samefag
>>223974 Literally no one even gives a fuck. You really are a narcissist.
>>224045 Ok comatoast, really convincing.
>>224049 Ok comatoast, really convincing.
>>224045 >>223990 >>224049 >>224085 This is so fucking autistic you are really seething
>>224117 Says the guy literally pretending to be me to discredit every post I make I know it's you comatoast, imagine being this mad over losing a debate. Pathetic moderator
Hey guys, Sage here. Just wanted to let you know I love penis. Thanks.
>>224117 I don't know who you are but I'm gonna say I like the other one better. They should get the title Sage samefag. >>224145 Nothing wrong with that.
>>224156 >I'm gonna say I like the other one better. Based, real Sage is simply the better Sage. In other words, me.
>>224156 >I'm gonna say I like the other one better. Based, real Sage is simply the better Sage. In other words, me.
>>224207 >>224184 >>224145 >>224142 Yea really funny guys, now would you autists stop false flagging?
>>224207 >>224184 >>224145 >>224142 Yea really funny guys now would you autists stop false flagging?
>>224253 No u ...Or do I mean, no me?
>>224292 No u!!!
Omg guise STOHP.
Would the real Sage Shady please stand up?
>>224307 >No flag Heh... nothin personel fakefag
>>224319 Hehe, there can be only one NAMEFAG buddy and that's me
>ITT: Sage t. Sage
>>224323 Hehe, there can be only one NAMEFAG buddy and that's me
>>224329 >>224327 >>224333 All me(Real Sage)
>>224338 Ok fakesage
Plot twist: it's all actually Sage
>>224346 Even bigger plot twist: None of them are sage.
>>224351 sage is not a person, it's a lifestyle.
>>224346 Where's the twist? It was literally all me, the real Sage.
>>224346 If everyone is Sage, nobody is Sage.
>>224359 Ok redditfag, stop trying to impersonate me.
>>224360 This, feelsgoodman.jpeg
>>224361 Ok comatoast, stop trying to impersonate me.
>>224357 *hits sage*
>>224363 oK cOmAtOaSt, StOp TrYiNg tO iMpErSoNaTe Me.
>>224366 No me
>>224367 Not me.
>>224340 >>224338 >>224333 >>224330 >>224329 >>224323 >>224319 >>224318 >>224307 >>224292 >>224253 >>224223 >>224207 >>224184 >>224156 >>224145 >>224142 >>224117 >>224085 >>224049 >>224045 >>223991 >>223990 >>223974 >>223960 >>223956 >this is the person who wants to “quality control” your board >this is the person concerned with bad posts and disruptive posts shitting up the board
(118.96 KB 392x366 1444011650084.png)
>>224392 Fucking lmao. The fact he really believes this is all >>224387 one person is hilarious.
(44.04 KB 304x304 pic related all me.jpg)
>>224399 >>224392 >samefagging You do realize you left your flag/name on right?
>>224402 Shut up sage.
(398.00 KB 800x800 cats.png)
Anyone else who impersonates Sage for the purposes of shitposting is going to get banned, with the greatest of respect this style of post is more suited to /GET/. Thanks.
>>224399 Okay, these are then all people who supposedly believe in quality control.
(987.08 KB 271x226 smh fam.gif)
>>224406 >t. comatoast Always putting a Sage brotha down...
>>224409 The fact you believe it's all mods is equally hilarious. It's like some kind of boogie man. Maybe people just wanna make fun of the name fag? It couldn't be that could it?
>>224413 Who said it was all mods?
>>224411 >>224406 AIN'T NO REST FOR SAGEFAG. MONEY DON'T GROW ON TREES. OK, OK, i'm done sage posting in the mod thread.
>>224433 Well I’m not.
What is this stupid fucking drama about
>>224483 I thought you just said you were finished Sage posting?
>>224486 namefags gonna namefag
>>224489 This, but unironically
>>224487 >>224489 >>224491 Tell me what the fuck are you doing, tell me what you retards have been talking about for the past hour, I don't want to scroll through petty insults to find out what you are spamming this thread for. I never visit this thread, I barely think about its existence, but I'm really curious to know what you guys are talking about.
>>224492 OK, ok, I'll tell you. We have achieved transcendental ego and by amalgamating our uniques, have thus synchronized into a singular and cohesive entity known simply as "Sage".
>>224501 I get it.
>>224521 This’ll keep going until the mods step in, basically.
test
(70.63 KB 1280x720 t435t4g.jpeg)
(429.31 KB 300x263 y546y5y56gh56g.gif)
>>224592 This trip, the first one, is the real one. You can watch for post differentiation between trips now make up your own minds
>>224614 This trip, this last one, is the real one. You can watch for post differentiation between trips now make up your own minds
>>224640 >>224623 >>224614 >>224601 >>224592 no of these are me lol jesus christ
Hey guys, just letting you know I'll be making a trip so you can recognize me since comatoast is doing so as well.
(38.06 KB 1024x474 1579087142177.jpg)
>>224657 A likely story.
>>224657 How could Sage(me) be Sage(me) without even using a flag? Like hahahahah are you KIDDING ME?
Hey guys, just letting you know I'll be making a trip so you can recognize me since comatoast is doing so as well.
(249.52 KB 1280x960 1579230201757.jpg)
Hey Sages, just letting you know I'll be making a trip so you can recognize me since Sage is doing so as well.
i am also sage
hahahaha me too im sage
(16.91 KB 474x278 ghtyutyu.jpeg)
>>224686 >>224680 >>224685 We're all sage down here brothers.
hahahaha also sage ahahah
How many levels of Sage are you guys on right now?
>>224706 SAGE IS MY FAVOURITE HERB
(158.48 KB 799x534 Sage.jpg)
Quick post something only Sage would know or else your a fake
>>224716 Heh... Watch this... Compared to me you are like a little baby
>>224727 >namefagging Imagine being such an attention whore, filtered idiot.
SAGE WINS
>>224768 If we're all sage then no one is sage
in these dire times, saging is newfagging, and bumping is oldfaggotry.
>>224776 And when no one is sage then everyone is Sage. We are all Sage. Sage lives in us
>>224782 Sage lives in me
>tfw you boogie man so hard everyone adopts your name I am the real sage *not* smugpepe.jpg
How much Sage could a Sagecuck cuck If a Sagecuck could cuck Sage? As much Sage as a Sagecuck could cuck, If a Sagecuck could cuck Sage.
>>224788 Sage lives in me. He lives in you too.
>>224824 Sage came in my asshole too
>>224839 Hey Sage, Sage here. Just letting you know my ass is tarnished. Thanks
Ok. fags. you wanna sage-post go to the dedicated sage post thread.
(124.26 KB 484x515 1409093848207.jpg)
>>224847 >go to the dedicated sage post thread >t. Jannie Sage (no trip edition)
>>224694 >We're all sage down here brothers. Holy shit. This scares me. We really are becoming sage. I saw your post and was like >WTF! >:( Why did sage steal my post and nobody even replied to sage? Then I looked at the times and I was like: >I stole sage's post? WTF! https://bunkerchan.xyz/leftypol/res/224711.html#q224934
Why does comatose keep deleting popular threads?
>>225176 He deleted the ideal communist thread wtf
>>225177 It was a good thread with like 90 replies most of which were effortposts what the actual fuck
>>225176 What threads are you talking about?
>>225177 because sageposting is only allowed in the dedicated sage post thread.
>>225226 oh that thread. Yeah. Some one was necro bumping it. It was old and becoming an eyesore. No one was actually responding too it. So I deleted it.
>>225221 The one with the nukes for example.
>>225231 Thread was becoming idpol 2.0. I had to delete probably about 40 posts in under an hour between a Nazi and some liberal. It had devolved into meaningless shit flinging. I gave it a chance to get back on its feet and it kept devolving into meaningless shit flinging idpol. Nothing of value was lost.
>>225233 >I am too lazy to do my job so innocent bystanders have to get nuked Even doing nothing would have been better.
(32.96 KB 600x399 trghrgtrtg.jpeg)
>>225240 At a certain point things become so unbearable they need to just be nuked. It doesn't matter what I say to you because you will just move the goal post further and further to find a reason to complain.
>>225240 The thread was Twitter levels of bad. It needed to go anyways. It was literally inviting the idpol.
uncritical support for idpol nuking
>>225272 You mean you disagreed. If the offtopicposters don't sage the offtopicposters deserve displacement. Censoring the innocent, however, shouldn't be forgiven. (I suspect they will still)
>>225425 Oh woe is the plight of those posting with in the "Hot takes thread!" Woe is them. Truly, we have faultered today, on this day, the day by which we have KILLED GOD. How can we recover? How will we, the murders of all murders be forgiven for our transgressions? GOD IS DEAD AND WE HAVE KILLED HIM.
>>225434 Don't trivialize and divert, you know a better job could've been done at modding. Are you drunk or something?
>>225450 It is your opinion that this is a big deal and its my opinion that it isn't. It's also the opnion of the mod the the thread needed to go. The mod makes the calls, ultimately. He made a judgment call. You are acting like it is some type of attack against you personally. Every single t slashed and I dotted. It's nothing but being vindictive. Rather than offer up anything constructive you are just throwing a temper tantrum and trying to act like you are "ze ultimate revolutionary (TM)" rather than just taking things for what they are and offering a more constructive criticism. Maybe I am not trivializiy anything. Maybe you are just making this a bigger deal than it actually is.
>>225425 >>225425 I mean at some point you have to do something to actually git rid of the problem. If the thread is a honeypot for idpol then the thread is the issue and the thread needs too go.
>>225465 I'm trying to put forward legit criticisms that the mod in question has been too brash in deleting the entire thing. You just keep accusing me of being "mad", while you feel the need to smugpost with ancient images. (I know how big our folders are, you're putting in the extra effort here. You know you need to defend and deflect.) >take things for what they are, make more constructive criticism A criticism, by definition, is an alternative outlook on how things are. These POVs are mutually exclusive. I'm just calling for putting moderators (especially ones like comatoast) more in the public light, I would like to see him defend himself with the deleted content in question in front of the mod team. But since the mod team is <somewhere> and they tend to discuss things in their own secret IRC or whatever, next best thing is indeed throwing around a bunch of random arguments and performing costly signaling that this is an issue at least some care about. (and hoping that someone somewhere notices) It makes perfect sense for the userbase to deeply distrust any sort of overt moderative overaction. The community has already split over this, and it can't and shouldn't take BS like that again. So curb your spinning of truths. A thread didn't just die, it was murdered for having no idpol exhaust elsewhere. Also the thread OP needs to be edited again: it says "don't post idpol out of containthread", but apparently there's a casus to delete any thread that two posters can fuck up in five flames. So much for being Fedresistant >>225484 Everyone knew deleting idpol containment would cause widespread idpolposting. Any thread that doesn't tell the posters what to post literally could be one. The problem is not gone, just a symptom of it. Unpopular opinion threads have been with us for a long time, and were a great source of disagrees and dialects. If you want to ban these types of threads, publicly announce you will in the OP and tell the userbase you're planning to do so instead of anonymously displacing all the lurking anons whenever.
(808.47 KB 1700x2151 Hegel_by_Schlesinger.jpg)
>>225497 Right but the only way to handle that on an imageboard is through laying out bans and deleting posts. The thread was literally just idpol 2.0; there was debate about deleting it out of the gate from everyone on the team for this exact reason. But, we opted too keep it around and not just delete it outright. Which, we did and it still devolved into what it devolved into. Furthermore we do not have a "Secret irc" the irc is public and anyone can join. I am in there all the time. The thread also, was, not exactly the highest quality. I think it had every reason to be removed. It is known that idpol is a bannable offense here, that's what the thread was. There are instances of idpol were we have agreed to go a bit softer, but, at some point you have to take action, anon. Also, for the record, there has been, as far as I can tell, little to no idpol on the board since the deletion of the thread. It's just when topics that allow for that type of discussion are allowed to continue unabated that they become that. The thread had every reason to be deleted.
>>225512 You, as a moderator, can only view maintaining board opinion through laying out bans and deleting posts. I felt the thread in question (and several more tabs I had to close due to "early 404") was quality and based. It incited discussion and criticisms. Once one fucker started claiming that memebabies spouting antitrans BS are #notmycomrade, it went downhill of course. But leaving the question in the middle does evoke both wehraboo and r/socialism newfaggotry that need to take the stirnerpill. Leaving the opportunity to give it to them will lead to cluelessness spreading through our cybersphere. leftypol always responded to bait. And it was great.
>>225497 Thanks for the feedback about the thread topic, I'll edit it now. Comatoast gave a good answer, just to give you an idea, about the process I asked for feedback about bumplocking the scary pomo frankfurt hate thread >>225140. A vol disagreed, gave their reason, and it seemed reasonable, so I didn't do anything. I'm was monitoring the thread, because I expected it to be shit. As I predicted, there are some shit /pol/-tier takes, but contrary to what I expected, it's manageable enough to not be a /pol/ or idpol honeypot, and OP seemed to be active in the thread, plus some other posters dispelling myths. Turned out to be an OK thread. We make a shit ton of these decisions a day. Sometimes we leave bait threads up because they turn out to be fun threads, sometimes they don't. User feedback is crucial, because we sometimes fuck up. But honestly, people complain of 1 out of 20 mod actions we take. We hear your complaints and take them seriously, sometimes too seriously IMO. Perhaps this was a mistake, I wasn't in the thread and hence can't judge.
>>225528 What discussion and criticisms did the hot take thread incite? Yes it was funny but it resulted in several people shit flinging idpol at one another because topics about race and gender are inevitably going to come out of such a thread. idpol isn't allowed here. I am sorry you feel the way that you do, but, no one really wants it here. I deleted many of the posts and they still kept going on with it. I told them to stop, I made a public post. The real issue here is that bans are meaningless since anyone can just change their IP now. You literally have to sit at a thread for hours on end until they get board and leave and I don't always have time to do that. I am an adult with actual issues in the world, living under the economic system that I do. The sky is not falling because I deleted one nebulous thread that was borderline idpol to begin with. Those types of threads are going to inevitably bring it onto the board.
>>225541 Not all discussion and criticism needs to be publicized to happen. It was fun to try and trigger, and it's in essence important that users trigger themselves to think. Such was the essence of the thread also. If the issue is available man-hours in modding, I'd be glad to help out in any way I can. I agree idpol will be inevitable once again. A better solution is needed. Giving them a board is too much space, giving a thread maybe also. (I wasn't in it often, but felt it was nice that at least some autists were kept out of other places because of it) And the concept of hot takes are memetically important (recently and in the past). Barely borderline idpol by itself, just blametheuserslol Symptomatic treatment that kills not-as-guilty cells is equivalent to heavy chemo. So the better solution is to get the users themselves to selfmoderate and [shitpost mode] spam nihilist-themed gore to exclude idpolfaggots perhaps even?
>>225582 I think right now if you look at the current state of the board the board looks good. There are many quality posts exhibiting much quality discussion and also some hilarious threads too that are presenting much lulz potential. Like I said, too me the thread was an eyesore that needed too go; that being the least of it's issues. And you are correct, not everyone needs to get hit by things like that, but, some times it's going to happen. Not everyone was guilty in the OG idpol thread either but that's how things function some times in places like these. Sometimes sacrifices are made to support the over all strength of the community. All that being said bringing new mods in is something we have been discussing as well. Personally I think we need to clean the more inactive members of the staff. I do support bringing some new people on, personally, though.
>>225582 I approve of heavy chemo against the idpoltards. The board needs to be cleansed.
>>225528 This. Most were actually interesting non-idpol takes. But janny just decides to memoryhole the whole thread. >>225541 >Yes it was funny but it resulted in several people shit flinging idpol at one another because topics about race and gender are inevitably going to come out of such a thread. So fucking what? The fact it keeps popping up - especially IRL - is exactly why we need to have that discussion. Like where can you actually discuss this shit? Reddit? 4/pol/? Mind. If you had just (re)created a cyclical the idpol would've been contained. But now it just seeps into every thread because you nuked the containment. If /leftypol/'s again going to turn into an echo chamber where we can only share stale rehashed opinions that conform to some board "consensus" I think I'll just stop coming here. I'm here to discuss things anonymously that I can't discuss anywhere else. I don't want to cuddled. I want to be triggered. Like who's even bothered by this stuff? Last time I checked there are over ~40 active threads on the front page.
>>225696 >I think I'll just stop coming here. And nothing of value was lost.
>>225696 Why do I feel like your the same guy as the last one who cried about how your """leaving""", all because IDpol was banned. If you were going to leave then you would just leave, instead of coming here to cry. After all what would it matter to give your thoughts on a place if you were not going to spend time there? "If the smoke makes me cough, I can leave. What’s so hard about that?" >>225706 Based
>>225696 Half those posts were: literally just "Not all men want to be fucks" "Black ppl are oppressed." If you want to talk about the other shit that was on that thread make an actual thread about it and make it so it doesn't suck. At least put some level of effort Into. It's really not that hard. >Muh I'm leaving and never comming back. Good riddance.
Mods are deleting dissenting opinions again.
>>225713 >all because IDpol was banned. You don't ban politics, you uphold identity politics by pretending they don't exist and banning anyone that actually wants to fight identity politics like white supremacy
>>225727 *You don't ban identity politics
There was nothing of value in the idpol containment, just endless incel post interpersed with some tranny hate. Nuking the containment and banning idpol was the correct thing to do. The rest of the internet is filled with pointless culture wars and assorted idpol debates. I suggest that people who miss the containment venture out there.
>>225724 No, i'm deleting peanut gallery posts that do nothing but try and stir up the pot. Conversation about the site should look like this >>225538 >>225528 If you don't have anything constructive to say don't say anything at all. Not everything is worthy of a response. >>225727 Are you unfamiliar with how image-boards function? This is pretty much part and parcel. Plus again, no one is pretending they don't exist. There are plenty of examples that have been explained endlessly to you people about threads that have been allowed too stay, even after the idpol thread, but you all just ignore that because you don't actually care about being constructive. You just want to cherry pick the things you don't like so you can bitch and complain and feel like you're being oppressed so you can larp about being a rev. That's how it is coming off to me, frankly. Like, this is just an imageboard, man. Relax.
>>225735 This.
>>225745 Why did you anti-incel poster shit up the thread then.
Just giving a heads-up for this thread >>225751 Not trying to do a repeat of the idpol thread. I just want to understand why they even care as no one ever explain this (and everyone knows reactionaries don't argue in good faith)
>>225760 I see, yeah, thank you for the heads up, anon.
>>225727 >like white supremacy Ok, so it's confirmed that you are the same retard who said he was going to "leave". Fucking crybaby faggot, at least follow through with your words. >>225720 Nah it's literally the same guy, he was in here before crying about IDpol and started seething. White/black race baiting is his only method of communication.
>>225782 >Ok, so it's confirmed that you are the same retard who said he was going to "leave". Okay schizo. >Fucking crybaby faggot, at least follow through with your words Lol, can't even take a few critiques without blaming made up people.
>>225739 I posted saying I agreed with poster disagreeing with you and you deleted it. Seriously your line is “if you are going to criticise us you have to do it like this” this place is officially r/socialism
>>225770 Nuke the trans thread. I thought there was not supposed to be any idpol.
>>225706 >>225713 >>225714 >Fuck off >You're a samefag Are you schizos? New? Just retarded? Were you around during the "anti-imperialism" split? I just don't want a repeat of the dumb "imperialist" (leftypol) or "shill" (pol) witchhunts. And I'd like the mods to confirm it's nothing like that. >>225739 So what's the proper way to discuss idpol? Is an effort post tolerated? Will threads get nuked if radlibs and incels start flinging shit?
>>225810 So, yeah you were pretty much just being the peanut gallery. Like I said, lol. >>225812 If it was like that then why would threads like the https://bunkerchan.xyz/leftypol/res/212025.html be allowed too exist? >Will threads get nuked if radlibs and incels start flinging shit? No, the hot takes thread was already pretty idpol, lol. I already stated this.
>>225811 What trans thread?
unlock the sage thread sage is in all of us he came deep inside all of us
>>225824 he probably means >>225751
>>225823 No it’s stating my support so you get proper feedback and know it’s not just one poster but many who think this. Funny how you don’t delete the “peanut gallery” posts backing you up. Actual child
>>225809 >T. guy who screeches that he's going to leave every single day yet never does
>>225827 Lol, I didn't make that choice, I want to unlock it. I will have to talk to the other mods about it. I didn't want it locked, lol. >>225829 Yeah that's what I figure. It's kinda proof too me that these people are just upset, because, the thread isn't an idpol thread. It's discussion how and why an idpol group of people become subjected to the ideology of it.
>>225832 I actually did delete those. The sage poster in this thread had some of his shit deleted because I didn't think it needed to be up here. 50 people all screeching about the same thing with out even bothering to use their brains and construct an argument that isn't more than a few words long don't need to be shitting up the thread. Funny how you conveniently don't know anything. Trust me you people cry about literally anything that happens. We are well aware of your issues.
>>225840 The sage poster is famously anti mod? So this is just you deleting more dissenting opinions ? All the posts saying “fuck off you are just crying” remain
>>225843 Sage posting is literally a meme now. Did you miss everything that happened in the last 12 hours? Point out the posts you think are unfair. I'll delete them.
>>225835 Lol bet it was that faggot comatoast who locked it. As the old saying goes, if you can’t handle the prolapse, don’t let Sage fuck you in the ass. Not that anyone can resist that piston pump monstrosity pounding their little stink hole
>>225847 >t. Sage(comatoast that always falseflags me edition)
>>225850 Lol, I literally just said it wasn't me who locked it. It got locked while I was away. Sorry, that would probably make it even funnier.
>>225834 >t. schizo
>>225847 You shouldn’t delete either though. Just let the argument stand so people can actually see what the users think
>>225854 See your ways are slippery comatoast you are not honest with the board how are we to know if it’s you when you don’t post with a name? So it is you, again, deleting all the threads and deleting dissent. Non of the other mods do this. Just you.
>>225857 I mean, I wouldn't exactly call that an argument. >>225855 That is not an argument. Nore was anything deleted to cover anything it. This thread is shit because it's full of shit like 225855 it makes having, actual, discussion almost impossible.
>>225861 I wish I could post screens from the mod chat who locked it, but, I can't. Not with out them being ok with it. -_(O.o)_- Also, I don't support namefagging, but, I will if you guys want me too, lol. I just don't like the idea of building identities on anonymous imageboards.
>>225869 My point was you say “I” like I’m supposed to know it’s you. Funny you say you don’t like namefagging and yet a name you have
>>225869 Of the mod IRC is Public, why can’t you post screen caps without their consent.
>>225878 See this is exactly what I mean; A compromise is made and you back peddle and move the goal posts. What is it you want?
>>225881 The IRC is public anyone can join it. I have been trying to get the other mods on it for a while. The way they run things is the way they run things, unfortunately. We use riot also, but, I never liked it. If you ever wanted to communicate with us though I hang out in it and some other mods have handles on it also. It's just a matter of joining.
>>225869 >>225883 I haven’t back peddled on anything you are just snaking around again thinking nobody notices. You consistently abuse mod privileges. There was no compromise, I said leave both sides of the discussion up, not just the side which supports you. Which is a treacherous and dishonest thing to do
>>225893 Where have I left up the side that supports me? Point it out. You did back peddle, you asked why I don't post with my name on and I told you and I said I would that I don't care and I still will. Then you just ignored that and changed the subjected. Deleting things that need to be deleted isn't abusing anything. This is again part and parcel.
>>225902 >Where have I left up the side that supports me? >>225782 >Ok, so it's confirmed that you are the same retard who said he was going to "leave". Fucking crybaby faggot, at least follow through with your words. yeh nothing peanut gallery about that >Nah it's literally the same guy, he was in here before crying about IDpol and started seething. >>225735 >Nuking the containment and banning idpol was the correct thing to do. etc etc etc these are all peanut gallery posts in support of deleting the idpol thread and in suppport of the mods in general. But apparently me saying I agree with the other poster is absolutely not allowed. Again, snaking around by you. I didn't backpeddle on shit. Talking about your namefagging was but one my criticisms, you ignored the rest, namely that it is consistently you who deletes and bans opinions that oppose yours, in an attempt to manipulate board discussion and then every time will go "oh you are just crying/overreacting" etc etc
>>225902 >Deleting things that need to be deleted isn't abusing anything. why is it only opposing opinions to yours that NEED to be deleted?
>>225929 You can't point to a single instance before this reply >>225724 which is when the posts in question got removed. two of which supported me but you keep ignoring that fact. The only ones I could think of or see that might seem biased are >>225714 >>225713 Which I missed I was trying to clean up the thread. I'm Sorry. Everything after >>225724 is irrelevant because this revolves around this discussion. I'm sorry you feel the way you do, but, I don't think that threads like these need to be shitted up with posts like these: >>225855 >it is consistently you who deletes and bans opinions that oppose yours, This is just a lie, but, discussing it with you is futile because neither one of us can actually prove it. I know what I did and for why. I don't know what else to tell you.
>>225891 Mods shouldn’t be talking on Riot. I knew you guys were lying about using IRC. I’ve been on your IRC channel, it’s dead. So it confused me when you said the mods have been deliberating on this or that when the IRC channel is dead. Turns out you’re all talking on Riot.
>>225971 >>225971 >You can't point to a single instance before this reply now who is shifting the goal posts. That wasn't the question, the question was whether posts in support of you were allowed, while posts against were deleted. The opposing posts were deleted before that post, the pro mod posts remain. >Which I missed I was trying to clean up the thread. I'm Sorry. you should stop trying to clean up the thread. Nobody asked you to, nobody wants you to. You are bad at it. You clearly use it for the gain of your own shit opinions >This is just a lie, but, discussing it with you is futile then why are so many posters making these accusations? They aren't making them about other mods, just you. So why is that? >>225975 its like when they somehow couldn't tell us the result of the idpol thread vote. Its all bullshit. They don't want a productive board they just want to pretend they are a commissar. Cool preside over a puddle of shit well done
>Sagethread locked >go to irc >no proof of anything or even a reason given for lock on thread So be it lads, have it your way
>>226012 Hey Sage, My name is Sage, and I hate every single one of you. All of you are Sage, Jannies, and Comatoast who spend every second of their day looking at bunkerchan logs. You are everything bad in the world. Honestly, have any of you ever let Sage in your ass? I mean, I guess it’s fun making fun of people because of your own insecurities, but you all take Sage in your ass to a whole new level. This is even worse than jerking off to pictures of my tits. Don’t be a spook. Just hit me with your best cum. I’m pretty much perfect. I was banned from leftypol, and cried in the mod thread. What posts do you make, other than “hey guys, Sage here”? I also get false flagged, and have a banging hot boyfriend (Sage just came in me; Shit was SO cash). You are all faggots who should just kill yourselves. Thanks for listening.
>>225997 >Now who's shifting the goalpost. I thought that was the goal post. Why are you using irrelevant posts that we're not part of that time frame to prove your point? I deleted three psys. One of yours that didn't support me and two of that sageposters who did support me. I deleted them and you are only focusing on your own. Why is that? >You should stop. That's like your opinion, man >They aren't making them about other mods just you. My guess is that i am the most visible as I just want to try and be transparent and keep these two ends of the board talking to one another. People in here are accusing me of anchoring the sage thread. Again, something I didn't do. I'm just the most visible so everyone likes to make me a boogieman. >They don't want a productive board. False. >They can reign over this piss puddle. Ok so you're done then?
>>226013 Hey guys, just letting you know I'll be making a trip so you can recognize me since comatoast is doing so as well.
>>226016 Hey Sage, My name is Sage, and I hate every single one of you. All of you are Sage, Jannies, and Comatoast who spend every second of their day looking at bunkerchan logs. You are everything bad in the world. Honestly, have any of you ever let Sage in your ass? I mean, I guess it’s fun making fun of people because of your own insecurities, but you all take Sage in your ass to a whole new level. This is even worse than jerking off to pictures of my tits. Don’t be a spook. Just hit me with your best cum. I’m pretty much perfect. I was banned from leftypol, and cried in the mod thread. What posts do you make, other than “hey guys, Sage here”? I also get false flagged, and have a banging hot boyfriend (Sage just came in me; Shit was SO cash). You are all faggots who should just kill yourselves. Thanks for listening.
>>226018 its not gay if sage cums in your asshole, if that is gay, then everyone is gay, sage has cum in everyones asshole
>>226020 hey guys, just letting you know I'll be shaving my legs so you can recognize me since comatoast is doing so as well.
>>226022 Hey Sage, My name is Sage, and I hate every single one of you. All of you are Sage, Jannies, and Comatoast who spend every second of their day looking at bunkerchan logs. You are everything bad in the world. Honestly, have any of you ever let Sage in your ass? I mean, I guess it’s fun making fun of people because of your own insecurities, but you all take Sage in your ass to a whole new level. This is even worse than jerking off to pictures of my tits. Don’t be a spook. Just hit me with your best cum. I’m pretty much perfect. I was banned from leftypol, and cried in the mod thread. What posts do you make, other than “hey guys, Sage here”? I also get false flagged, and have a banging hot boyfriend (Sage just came in me; Shit was SO cash). You are all faggots who should just kill yourselves. Thanks for listening.
>>226014 Hey COMATOAST, just letting you know I'll be making a trip so you can recognize me since comatoast(you) is doing so as well.
>>226025 Hey Sage, Sage here. Just letting you know I'll be making a trip so you can recognize me since comatoast is doing so as well.
>>226029 Hey Sage, other Sage here. Just letting you know I'll be making a trip so you can recognize me since comatoast is doing so as well.
>>226030 Hey Sage, third Sage here. Just letting you know I'll be making a trip so you can recognize me since comatoast is doing so as well.
>>226035 Hey Sage, evangelion Sage here. Just letting you know I'll be unleashing third impact so you can recognize me since comatoast is doing so as well.
>>226038 Hey Sage, banned Sage here. Just letting you know I'll banned so you can recognize me since comatoast is doing so as well.
>>226014 >Why are you using irrelevant posts that we're not part of that time frame to prove your point? I did not at any point specify a time frame. You completely invented that in order to pretend you didn't do what you clearly did, which was delete posts opposing your opinion while leaving the others up. Point out where I specified a time frame. >One of yours that didn't support me and two of that sageposters who did support me two of my posts were deleted. Posts in favour of you remain. These are only my posts so I can't be sure how many others you deleted. >That's like your opinion, man it is the opinion of many people, you deleting those opinions does not change that. >I just want to try and be transparent and keep these two ends of the board talking to one another. you are so full of shit. You delete one half of the conversation and then say this. Magically you happen to support the other half. What a coinkydink that is >False. they have done nothing to prove otherwise >Ok so you're done then? "if you don't like it go home" "if you don't like it go home" "if you don't like it go home" "if you don't like it go home" is the response of a moron. Hand over ears lalala comment
>>226040 Hey sage, sage here, just letting you know my ass is filled to the brim with your cum. Thank you blessed sage for this most generous of gifts. comatoastisafaggot
>>226046 Hey Sage, anal prolapsed Sage here, just letting you know I can no longer hold any more cum, since comatoast has taken it all.
>>226056 Hey Sage, Comatoast here, just letting you know we use a public IRC(jk), good luck reaching us since its dead
>/GET/ is Bunkerchan's general/shitposting board Why is that? Comradeking is a scumbag that abuses his position to benefit his cronies. >>222617 You can talk about it in the idpol thread normalfag >>222626 >muh sperging out Imagine being a depressed fuck and thinking you are superior to me because I have autism Make your dreams come true, off yourself.
>>226083 >You can talk about it in the idpol thread normalfag lmao what rock you living under fam the idpol thread is GONE
>>226089 I don't browse this place as much as I used to because it's bad for my mental health considering that most of you, including the mods, especially the mods, are a bunch of ungrateful brats and decadent champagne socialists I used to make like the 60% of the OC but I apparently I am hugely disliked because I am a "sperg" and that means that all my contributions towards the revolution are meaningless. If my "spergouts" annoy you so much feel free to search archives for my OC instead, nigger.
>>226065 >>226056 >>226046 >>226040 >>226038 we are all sage sage came inside us. He is in all of us as we have been banished, this is now our home >>226035 >>226030 >>226029 >>226023 >>226022 >>226020 >>226016 >>226018 >>226013 >>226012
>>226085 >Comradeking is a scumbag that abuses his position to benefit his cronies. proof?
>>226098 i completely agree with this. The mods are spoilt brats who can't handle oppossing opinions, so they try and get rid of good posters such as yourself, for whatever reason they can. It is precisely this which kills the board. They don't care as long as they stay in control
>>226098 don't leave the board fam. Stay here and struggle against the corrupt mods. We are with you
>>226098 >t.Sage Hey Sage, My name is Sage, and I hate every single one of you. All of you are Sage, Jannies, and Comatoast who spend every second of their day looking at bunkerchan logs. You are everything bad in the world. Honestly, have any of you ever let Sage in your ass? I mean, I guess it’s fun making fun of people because of your own insecurities, but you all take Sage in your ass to a whole new level. This is even worse than jerking off to pictures of my tits. Don’t be a spook. Just hit me with your best cum. I’m pretty much perfect. I was banned from leftypol, and cried in the mod thread. What posts do you make, other than “hey guys, Sage here”? I also get false flagged, and have a banging hot boyfriend (Sage just came in me; Shit was SO cash). You are all faggots who should just kill yourselves. Thanks for listening.
>>226101 Hey sage, Sage here, just letting you know I love it when you cum in my pooper, since comatoast is doing so as well.
>>226158 t. comatoast with ass full of jizz
>>226175 sage is in all of us. He came in all of us
>>226181 autism is a mental illness
>>226184 autism is when you don't understand jokes. Let sage into your asshole like we all have
(72.02 KB 680x514 ebin trans.png)
>>226184 No, it's a neurological disease. But so are gender dysphoria and autogenophilia, but that's problematic and you are not allowed to say that here >>226102 Pic related
>>225760 >>225770 Thread was a mistake. Please lock and purge all the "dial 8" spammers.
>>226418 The end result was obviously going to happen. I still can't believe jannies will allow your IDpol bait yet bumplock many, many great threads. Trash mods tbh.
>>226455 How the fuck is it bait? You don't even know what bait means retard.
>>226460 >"LE TRANNIES" >WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT? IDPOL IN MY THREAD? HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE???? ebin.
>>226455 We should probably hire some mods, then purge all the current mods.
>>226464 >Mentioning trans people in any way shape or form is bait Where do all you retards come from, seriously.
>>226468 Trans is not a class, beat it with this Idpol
>>226476 That is not what was said.
>>226476 you heard it people all matters of liberation are idpol socialism is when you kill a bajillion million trillion people so idpol issues go away
>>226468 >I refuse to see the reality, and thus will post IDpol bait while pretending IDpol will not happen
>>226484 >Asking why right wingers believe what they do is idpol
>>226490 >IDPOL IN MY THREAD????? HOW UNEXPECTED????
>thread deleted Good riddance, but when will you start banning /pol/tards that keep ruining threads like this?
>>226498 try making a thread in good faith next time
>>226498 They just ban evade right after, it's a waste of time.
>>226498 Lol, you were getting BTFO’d.
>>226499 <If a thread gets derailed its your fault :^) How many fucking disclaimers do you have to add to stop people derailing? I asked a very specific question and the resident inceltards decided to turn it into a debate about whether trannies are mentally ill. >>226502 I wasn't even involved in the whole "trannies are mentally ill" and "jews did transgenderism" sidetrack. So not seeing how I was being "BTFO" as every attempt at staying on-topic was met with "dial 8" trash.
>>226511 Oh wait, actually; I did call out the nazi for getting his facts wrong and tried to get back on topic. Truly my fault a thread gets derailed (like a ton of threads lately) when it gets raided by bad-faith incel reactionaries.
>>226511 >OH NOOOOOO WHO WOULD HAVE IMAGINED SUCH A THING OCCURRING?!?!?!?
>>226511 well i mean like >>226500 said there's not much you can really do about it other than recruiting more volunteers and reporting incidents to them. anybody can post here including opposition
>>226502 >>226519 I was in the thread complaining about mods and the traction of the thread, OP literally stated before hand that it wasn't to be a thread about trans people specifically or about trans debate. Everyone, especially a few, completely ignored that and made the thread a 300 post idpol debate that inevitably devolved into a conspiracy shitfest that culminated at the end in one anon just flatly stating that calling for the end of capitalism as a solution to falling birth rates and utilizing a materialist anlysis for once was "snowflake communism" and that anyone that disagreed hated men and wanted them sterilized.
So I came after not posting in like 2 months and comrades this is a sad day for me. This place is a full-blown Vampire Castle of terrifying proportions and it's so fucking sad and infuriating to see you being succesfully cannibalized by radlib trans posters Good news for you: I am going to stop coming to this site forever and generally being enganged with leftism both online and IRL as it's severely affecting my mental health. Why both IRL and online? Because this online space pretty much reflects what's happen with IRL leftwing movements, and just thinking about it makes me feel like I am going insane. I am not supposed to be the babysitter of crazy mods and t-people nor the voice of reason as I have mental issues of my own. Fuck those things. I swear to God that Vaush was right during his Twitter meltdown, the wokoids and trannies, these people never have enough, NEVER, they are like a hungry black hole, holy fuck. You own /GET/, you own /gulag/, you own /hobby/, you own /int/, you own Something Awful, you own Twitter, you own Reddit and now you own /leftypol/ too congrats, you won, be happy about it. Sometimes Evil wins. I am tired of trying to look after your wellbeing and the wellbeing of the movement while morons like spergzy and comradeking harass me, fuck off. You will see me ocasionally in 8cunt's /pnd/ but I am gonna get off the internet and try to look to improve myself and my own wellbeing instead of looking forward socialist causes because fuck that noise, I come up to realize that moral egoism is somewhat based. I give up, you won. Shitpost this place into oblvion as you tend to do. The only solution that is left is the Posadas' one. I'd nuke you all, I'd nuke you all trans idpolers so bad. You are going to accuse me of shilling but as an autist I was born with a low CHARISMA stat which means that herd-driven people eventually hate me for no good reason, I mean, ComradeKing ban for 3 months just for writing "neurotypical". If you think I am concern trolling do a huge favour to the development historical materialism and apply a moderate dose of bullet poison right into your brain, that is going to be effective for your paranoid delusions more than any anti-psychotic you may be taking. This drama is taking a huge toll on my health, so fuck you, I am not selfish but I don't owe you anything. I'd post my complains and tips in /gulag/ but the mods there perma-banned there while stating no reason and I think they were the responsables of my ip-range ban 5 months ago after I convinced them to unban me. So yeah, fuck them aswell. Oh, also, I'd like to thank comradeking, spergzy, freudposter, that tankie with BPD, that psychology student and pask for making my attempts to improve this site nightmerish, fuck you all you sadistic low-punching hypocrites. You made your bed, now lie in it. >inb4 good riddance sperg Trust me, I am not going to miss you either. Fucking die in a nuclear fire. End of my "spergout" as you like to NPCs call it. Bye, I am going to fap and then to bed, good night.
>>226537 >I refuse to look at reality, it's everyone else's fault He himself knew it was bait >>225760, the end result was obvious.
(539.23 KB 1596x900 sayonara phaggot .png)
>>226542 >I am going to stop coming to this site forever Stopped reading here, later faggot. See you here tomorrow.
>>226542 >I swear to God that Vaush was right during his Twitter meltdown, the wokoids and trannies, these people never have enough, NEVER, they are like a hungry black hole, holy fuck. This
>>226542 mate don't leave we need you to fight the shit mods
>>226547 >implying anyone leaves when they say they leave
>>226542 Good riddance schizo, if you can't just deal with the existence of people that do nothing that affects you, that's not anyone's problem but yours to deal with
>>226551 eh this one looks semi credible but thank you blessed sage for you advice nonetheless your cum is firmly in my ass
>>226552 >Good riddance schizo, if you can't just deal with the existence of people that do nothing that affects you, this is hwy the mods should cut their shit out and free up the board
>>226547 You're talking to the 'neurotypical' spammer who has shit up this board for months.
>>226543 >Give mods heads up >Explicitly state you don't want a repeat of the idpol thread and it's not to be about trans people specifically <This is bait Got it. Anything even tangentially related to idpol is bait. Even if it's just trying to understand right wing ideology. Anyone trying to have a discussion in good faith is just a moron or a troll.
>>226542 First Miku, now neurodivergent-kun. Will the radlib troon platoon stop at nothing?
>>226556 >le tell mods about thread, because you literally already know its going probably to cause a shitstorm >also because you know that mods would delete such obvious IDpol bait >I HAD NO IDEA THIS WAS GOING TO HAPPEN!!!!!! ebin.
(118.17 KB 720x960 AlunyaArms.png)
>>226542 >Supposed to be a leader of the revolution >Have a mental breakdown seeing other people have an internet fight sometimes i wonder how some of youse niggas made it on 4chan in the first place. Weren't you watching children being raped and people being mutilated, beheaded, daily? Whatever. How about we get back on track? In a short while the staff is going to start the countdown on /tech/. We have to stand in solidarity with all new boards in order to get what we want. Yes, its somewhat humiliating having to dance to the tune the staff play, but I currently see no other alternative. So i've run the numbers, there has to be at least five of us that can be dedicated to willing the new boards, starting with /tech/ into existence. If you're reading this, you're one of the five. The responsibility is yours. Given that the goal is 300 threads started, the five of us will need to create 3 threads daily to ensure /tech/ happens. Don't worry about posting in the threads, that doesn't count. Just be aware ahead of time and start planning, getting ideas for threads, etc.. Try and make them reasonable, the staff are going to be looking for any excuse to discount a thread as spam, not count it, all those stupid games. So just go on other tech boards for some inspiration if you're out of ideas for some days and so on. After this will come /his/, then hopefully the film and video game boards, don't remember what else had high votes in the polls. and maybe they'll be an /idpol/ board somewhere between there the way things are going around here. Remember, Three unique threads a day.
>>226542 >>226546 >Multiple anon not caring, rejecting what amounted to half-baked conspiracy theories, and/or stating that trannies are a non-issue that aren't the apocalyptic level threat a few were making them out to be means this board is a radlib Vampire Castle blackhole None of you have actually read Fisher and you actively utilize idpol while simultaneously accusing others of engaging in it.
>>226563 >have to artificially inflate numbers to get your board >thinking you won't instantly get called out for this, only proving the mods were right all along Lol Comatoast has played you idiots so well its hilarious.
There needs to be an anti-idpol board as /leftypol/ is not that anymore.
>>226566 comatoast is on our side idiot.
>>226563 >Given that the goal is 300 threads started, the five of us will need to create 3 threads daily to ensure /tech/ happens. I’ve got years of experience in IT and am an avid free software advocate but this board is full of radlib feminists that never fail to label me an incel. No way in hell am I posting anything in /tech/. This board repels anyone that’s not deep into goon dirtbag left culture.
>>226542 Thank god
>>226569 >t. Comatoast
>>226562 He literally attempted multiple times to get it back on track, I still have the thread open in tab to see anon. If anything, if he actually wanted to ask the question without it diverting into idpol territory, he was correct to alert the mods because of how quickly it could diverge. Which, I might add, they did nothing in regards to moderation until 5 hours in and allowed the thread to devolve into off-topic spiraling. Also, if you're the same anon in the thread that used the same flag, you fucking participated in that idpol spiral.
>>226574 T.sage
So as we can see deletion of the idpol thread is going well...
>>226577 >t. comatoast posting as me to falseflag my name t. real Sage
>>226557 >radlib troon platoon Fucking hilarious A+ >Shit up multiple threads with your tranny conspiracy hate <Hurr why wont these tranny radlibs stop talking about trannies holy fuck stop talking about trannies dilate dilate dilate I'm sure though that the one time someone asks about the origin of this phenomenon will be used as proof this is a pro-tranny radlib hugbox or something. >>226562 I told them because without the containment I wasn't sure if any mention of it was even allowed. The thread also started off well and almost got into an interesting discussion about culture wars, before someone decided to make it about the "radlib tranny conspiracy" even though that wasn't the fucking point of the thread. Really curious btw about how you think these things should be discussed. Because if we can't discuss the origins of right wing ideology in good faith, leftypol's worse off because of it >>226568 <There's a global jewish conspiracy to emasculate white males and turn them into eunuchs >Not idpol Okay whatever
>>226568 >Rejecting tranny delusions isn’t Idpol Crafting your whole political narrative around them, then forming a conspiracy theory about the bourgeoisie trying to castrate men by pushing transsexualism while rejecting calls to focus on economics and establish actual communism as "snowflake communism" while being more in favor of SocDem reform is idpol you faggot. This is the shit we called out all the time on old leftypol, yet you lament how this is somehow a new development and that this board is somehow infested. As I said before, I myself have been critical of aspects of transexual ideology, but never to the autistic extent I favor Social Democrats and conceptualize a whole conspiracy around trannies.
>>226588 ><There's a global jewish conspiracy to emasculate white males and turn them into eunuchs What a Desperately built strawman. No one said anything about Jews. People are bombarded with this tranny stuff and are getting sick if it. It’s like That brainwashing episode from Star Trek where they beat Cpt. Picard until he said there were 4 lights in front of him, when in fact there were only 3.
>>226581 ITT: Paranoia is the driving force of much counter revolutionary sentiment. How many levels of paranoid narcissistic delusion are you on? You did it to yourself by being a name fag, friendo.
(102.29 KB 562x640 sheeeeeeeit.jpg)
>226588 >the origins of right wing ideology Yea I'm sure that's what you wanted to talk about. A highly engaging and critically important issue of trannies, and the right winger relation to trannies. lol.
>>226593 >takes off my name to pretend to be another user Sorry Comatoast, but I can see your posting style a mile away. Nice failflag idiot.
>>226595 Sorry Comatoast, but I can see your posting style a mile away. Nice failflag idiot.
>>226591 I have the fucking thread anon, baboon poster was literally discussing how a class of manegerial eunuchs are being pushed by the Jewish capitalists, and then other posters including you agreed minus the Jewish part.
>>226599 >haha look I copy u haha Comatoast is SEETHING right now. It'll take a thousand years in order for you to perfect my posting style. Best to quit while your behind. Take a nap buddy...Hopefully one that leaves you in a coma, and toast(in general)..
>>226563 Pretty sure it's 300 posts not 300 threads, but regardless just spamming the test board to get the board made is not working within the spirit of the system, you should use the board as you actually mean to go on
>>226606 Comatoast is SEETHING right now. It'll take a thousand years in order for you to perfect my posting style. Best to quit while your behind. Take a nap buddy...Hopefully one that leaves you in a coma, and toast(in general)..
>>226610 Comatoast is SEETHING right now. It'll take a thousand years in order for you to perfect my posting style. Best to quit while your behind. Take a nap buddy...Hopefully one that leaves you in a coma, and toast(in general)..
(30.23 KB 500x500 edrfgdegfder.jpeg)
Warning I will fucking gangrape anyone who tries to start a conversation about jew trannies in this thread,
(60.24 KB 960x540 Grape you in the mouth.jpg)
>>226615 >gangrape
>>226594 Have you been in a coma for the past few years? Tranny conspiracies have been a while now. Question about idpol and how it relates to right wing ideology isn't the same as idpol. Jeez christ, do you believe the same about racism too? >>226591 Were you even in the fucking thread?
(85.79 KB 345x475 Alunya3.png)
>>226607 I was going off the pinned thread on /tech/, which was left vague >-After a month, if the board has garnered at least 300 on that month's topic Better to prepare for the worst and hope for the best. another complaint about this roulette thing is that all the post links are going to break once the board is moved, its happened every other time and its ruined peoples lives probably.
>>226615 What are you gonna do? Give one of those heavy handed one week bans? I'm sure this will finally bring their shitposting to a halt. This time for sure. For some reason.
(18.54 KB 320x448 ayyyyy.jpg)
>>226621 >"look i'm dancing around IDpol" >"Not IDpol baiting" >"Not IDpol baiting" >"Not IDpol baiting" Ok
>>226564 >y-you are the idpol ones t-transphobes! Oh shit here we go again. Better don't let those proles talk about actual prole issues, huh?
>>226573 Anon, it's sad that you are happy that this place is being killed dying
>>226652 >Idpolfags "leaving"(I wish) en mass <this place is being killed If this is being killed, I'll take another serving thanks.
>>226652 >412 users >upwards of 112 posts per hour >Otherboards reciving increased trafic >Newboards are in the works >This place is dying The only people trying to "kill" this site are the small group of wreckers who seek to autistically sperg out about everything that happens.
>>226652 We actually have more PPH and unique ISPs than before. >>226633 Still doesn't answer the question; do you think an understanding of right wing ideology is relevant (including idpol) and how should it be discussed?
>>226663 >We actually have more PPH and unique ISPs than before. What is "before"? 3 months ago? Sure 4 years ago? No. Also, I don't consider redditors and chapofags as people my dude. >>226663 You were baiting and it's pathetic how the mods support you in flowding this place with tranny idpol
>>226664 How fucking disingenuous can you possibly be? We just went through a fucking board migration you fucking wrecker. This is why Stalin did the purges right here.
>>226664 >Analyzing idpol is the same as idpol Marx and Engels both wrote extensively about the relation of idpol to capitalism. Fuck off with this disingenuous bs
>>226667 That happened close to a year ago now.
>>226672 It happened 6 months ago LOL
>>226667 >How fucking disingenuous can you possibly be? This is called "projection" >We just went through a fucking board migration you fucking wrecker. Yes newfag, there was this thing called "Infinity" and an aussie shitposter destroyed it with his livestream and manifesto >Stalin would have killed you Yeah, Stalin was clearly very tolerant towards "queer people" Are you the moron with BPD perhaps? >>226673 >lol Fuck off back to chapo
(229.64 KB 640x360 1454709438256.png)
>>226663 >he thinks he can steer this conversation into something else entirely so he can runaway from the fact he was clearly and intentionally IDpol baiting. Nice bait, I won't be taking it.
>>226674 >This is called "projection" This is called deflection >Yes newfag, there was this thing called "Infinity" and an aussie shitposter destroyed it with his livestream and manifesto What is your point? >Yeah, Stalin was clearly very tolerant towards "queer people" Are you the moron with BPD perhaps? Muh queer people; you idpol fags are really this upset about the idpol thread getting cratered aren't you?
>>226676 You're just deflecting and shitposting at this point because you have no answer to how right wing ideology should be discussed or how the analysis of idpol is equal to idpol. >>226678 >hating autistic I'm not. Fuck off.
>>226679 >What is your point? You are absolutely and utterly retarded, that's my point. >you idpol fags are really this upset about the idpol thread getting cratered aren't you? Cope Seems like the janitors already deleted my reply to: >>226661 That was quick hotpockets.
Nothing of value was lost.
>>226682 >analysis of IDpol >"hey guys so whaAAaAaats the deal with trannies and rightoids? Amirite?" Lol.
test
>>226685 >You hate people with autism <Uh I don't >BUT YOU DO >>226688 Replace trannies with antisemitism/racism. Or just type in that question on any search engine and try finding a good answer to it, because there isn't. Again, it's pointless because just like those tards in that thread you'll keep evading then post another disingenuous shitposts and pretend that trying to understand idpol is the same as peddling it.
(59.29 KB 640x640 t numale7.jpg)
>>226695 >because there isn't. >When the cope runs this deep. There are literal hundreds of places for you to """"analyze""" Idpol. I suggest trying out reddit, they love this shit. Then you can finally hear the replies you were wanting: "RING WINGERS AND TRANNY PROJECTION AMIRITE?, HAHA ANOTHER QUALITY THREAD OP".
>>226698 You're either incredibly fucking sheltered or lucky that you've never had to argue against this shit. Because there are a ton of proles who will reject socialism outright because they're high on right wing idpol propaganda. (Incel, humans vs orcs, tranny hysteria) "Racism/muhsoggyknees/Trannies are bad" is not a good substitute for dispelling idpol spookery. Hence why Marx and Engels (and other Marxists) wrote extensively on the subject of idpol (in relation to capitalism) because you can't let reactionaries control the narrative. >RING WINGERS AND TRANNY PROJECTION AMIRITE? I don't even believe that, fuck off
>>226648 >Less then 1% percent of the population of the population is a prole issue >Spamming a thread about trannies is speaking about "prole issues" I don't use this statement often, but this is as much of first world issue as you could possibly make one. Even in the first world people unironically don't give as much of a shit about trannies as you do. I actually work in a trade with the most shoot-the-shit, straight to your face people and if you ask almost any of them what their opinion of trans people are, the majority of them will say "I don't give a shit". A few may throw a few jokes and we'll have a good laugh, but other then that nobody particularly cares because all of us have more pressing things to put weight into. We have our things to do and many have families to support, a literal who part of the population that makes up less then a single city nationwide is not our major concern. You'll hear a muttering or a rant after work about immigrants or china more often then you'll hear one about trannies, if ever.
(36.86 KB 500x500 t numale 2.jpg)
>>226704 >B-but I want to convert the incels, racists, and right wingers! Then go argue about it with them on /pol/, no one wants your faggotry here. Alternatively for your """""analysis""""(aka bait: le rightoids and le trannies lmao?) I suggest >>>/reddit/ instead, which is what your really looking for.
Oh my god sage yes coom into me
>>226723 DISREGARD THAT I SUCK COCKS
>>226719 Reddit is where the rightoids get banned from the socialist forums. Here is where we convert them, it has always been this way since old leftypol. Even in this last month we have had converts
>>226724 >I SUCK COCKS Same here my Sage brother, same here.
>>226724 >>226726 Sage is IN all of us
>>226719 >If you wanna to analyse racism just asks racists lmao What a dumb fucking take. In fact just replace "racism" with any [insert reactionary ideology] and it's obvious how dumb it is. Reactionaries /pol/tards don't argue in good faith. So there's no point asking them about racism, trannies or whatever when you're already familiar with the bs answers they peddle designed to obfuscate their true intentions. I guess you're also the sort of retard that thinks /pol/tards deny the holocaust because they're genuine "skeptics"? >>226725 Also this. The only people that benefit from not dissecting rightist ideology are /pol/tards.
>>226727 No, actually Sage is not in any of you incels, only me.
>>226733 No, actually Sage is not in any of you incels, only me.
>>226733 Sage is in me. He is in all of us. He is in the incels and the chads. The Andrew Ying and The Andrew Yang. The up, down, the side to side. The zero and the one. The nothing and the infinite everything. Come now, let sage in
>>226736 Actually Sage is inside of me, cooming.
>>226732 Listen I grow weary of this never ending copefest that are your replies. Who is right in the end? The guy who baited a shitstorm? Or the guy who pointed out the obvious bait? Idpol was banned for a reason, the only reason your thread was allowed is because you sucked the cock of a jannie. Also I think some of them unironically like watching the shitstorms. Can't even count the amount of times they sit in threads letting incel and tranny spam go on for hundreds of posts. Final words: your """""analysis""""" threads amount to reddit threads, go back home redditor.
>>226740 Sage makes tentacle hentai look like a woman’s swimsuit catalogue. The coom works in mysterious ways.
>>226738 Wow that deep...in my ass
>>226741 >sucked the cock of a Jannie And yet here you are, sucking off Jannies and their decisions in all your posts you cocksucker
(30.13 KB 600x902 le shadman.jpg)
>>226736 >ShadSage
>>226745 The deeper the coom greater potential for your own powers of sorcery to blossom
>>226742 Opening your ass allows your mind to open to the mysteries of the universe, and Sage's coom.
>>226741 Disregard that, I suck cocks.
>>226741 Regard that, I take it in the ass
>>226752 The mythical third eye is in fact a reference to the loosened sphincter after sage cooms inside you. The loosening represents the opening of the third eye. The ancient sages knew this, but their tale has been erased from history by those who sleep. Sage is the last of the ancient to retain the deep secrets of the coom
Does anyone know what's up with the RSS feed? It doesn't seem to be working properly. It updates for stuff that hasnt had a post in weeks.
>>226760 I too have studied the long forgotten scrolls of the Estoric Taiwanese coomers My prostate has enlarged itself threefold through meditation, there is much coom to be had brother.
>>226764 Let the light of sage coom in you to unearth such knowledge
>>226764 I didn't even know we had one of those.
>>226767 >>226767 Truly sage your enlarged prostate is awe inspiring and terrible to behold. Your blessed taint bulges with the filling of 1000 or more litres of coom. The Arc of the covenant roughly translated from Ebonics means literally “the prostate of the coom”. So it is written
>>225696 >I want to be triggered. <gets so triggered, leaves board Good job?
>>226732 You pretend like the thread still had value. Everyone wishes they could discuss idpol, but "anti-idpol" idpolers invariably shit up threads. This board does not allow idpol, that thread became 100% idpol. There was nothing to salvage, nothing to save. Idpolers shat the thread, as per usual. Which is the fucking reason it's not allowed to begin with. Yeah, everybody wants to talk about idpol, but reactionary fucktards will shit up the threads as you have seen. The thread was given a chance.
(43.99 KB 600x603 He does it for free.jpg)
>that one avatarposter keeps making the same thread forcing the jannies to keep deleting it Based.
>>226904 That dude is actually a reactionary spammer who pulled this once before. Nothing based about it. Hes just an idiot.
>>226995 All that matters is that he makes jannies seethe.
>>227035 Trust me, jannies don't give an actual shit about any of this. It's just bussniess as usual
SPACE WHY ARE YOU KEEP BLOCKING TOR?! you fucking technocratic fascist faggot, I just KNEW you were a plant from the beginning
>>227038 >t. jannie
>>227044 What are you talking about? If Tor was banned, I couldn't shitpost so relentlessly.
Can we make it so that the flag stays selected after making a post? I used to post with a flag but I've stopped doing so because it's annoying to always manually select it for every post. I've seen people use less flags, I guess for that very reason
>>227156 >I've stopped doing so Good for you, only absolute mongs use flags.
>>227197 Hitler privatised his whole economy you joker fuck up
Nah
why lock the Nazi thread? Bloodletting is fun and good exercise and good for morale
also why ban the Nazi? Now there is no chance to convert. You mods are so stupid
>>227275 >>227275 Lol, yes clearly calling us leftist retards was respectful and honest questioning.
>>227306 Who gives a fuck. It’s entertaining for us and educational for them >oh no I didn’t like the Nazis tone What is with the paper thin skin around here all of a sudden
>>227306 well try harder - Ayn Rand
>>227321 but in all seriousness it says more about the board than the poster. learn to take insults constructively.
>>227310 The occasional nazi is all good fun, but there has been a lot of stealth nazis lately. We had a thread full of holocaust deniers recently. We have to be careful so we don't get astroturfed.
>>227339 Yeh but the modding policy is way too far the other way. Before it was suggested me have a dedicated Nazi beatdown thread I think that is a good idea
>>227310 You knew the deal comming in here. You don't like it fuck off. The rules aren't hidden. That rule is plain for all too see.
>>227352 >Leftist retards Jews run the world > WHY U NO LET YOU NO LET THIS EXIST? Eat shit and die faggot; cry me a river
>>227323 It's not about taking insults it's about not letting the board become over run with these idiots and low quality bait posts that are going to lead to nothing constructive. Give them an inch and they take a mile. They're lucky we let them even come on here. The only reason it's allowed is because out reach is more important than sequestering ourselves in our nice little echo Chambers. But if they don't want to actually engage in real debate then they don't need to be here.
>>227367 >it’s the rule so it must be correct
>>227406 Not at all, but as it currently sits that is the way things are run so if you can come up with a better argument than jist screeching at the top of your lungs like a small child then by all means make your argument. Personally, I think a thread dedicated to the bastards I a horrible idea. It will either result in idpol2.0 or just a hug box for the cunts. Like I said in >>227386 as it sits it's about keeping them at Bay not about censoring anything. They're more than welcome to post just don't be a troll which is exactly what they were doing in the thread that you, sneakily, tried to build a victim narrative around. Purposely being disingenuous and ommiting that fact. That deff isnt going to help your case. This isnt /b/ or 4chan. We at least try to have some monicum of civility here so that the people that actually come here to discuss leftist politics have the space they disire. This isn't a site for neo Nazi tards this is a site for communists and leftists first and foremost.
>>227422 >monicum It's modicum, comrade.
>>227424 Shitttt, lmfao. Oh well. Im to lazy to correct it right now. Fuck it.
>>227422 >if you can come up with a better argument than jist screeching at the top of your lungs point out what i said that is "screeching" I made my argument. We need to convert, if you ban them all you do is turn them away. Nobody learns. The other part I said is its fun and good for morale. To all of these you have come up no counters just accused me of screeching. Meaning that it is in fact you screeching. >It will either result in idpol2.0 fine, removing the idpol thread was a shit idea > just a hug box for the cunts. it wont be it will be us piling in on them. >They're more than welcome to post bollocks half the leftist here aren't even allowed to post
(142.80 KB 561x855 witch hat 11edit2.jpg)
>>227480 didnt I tell you to GB2reddit yesterday? This isn't your home anymore, IDpol shitposter.
>>227497 >hur dur anti reddit but pro heavy handed moderation You are a joke, guy, a farce, completely inconsistent, completely incoherent. Screeching “muh idpol” does not change that a bit
>>227497 I can see sage has filled your ass up with the deep and ancient coom and your pea brain cannot handle it
>>227504 Sage is in me. Sage is in all of us
>>227500 >Breaking the affore mentioned rules is heavy handed moderation
>>227500 >>227480 >>227352 >>227310 These people will bitch about anything. They are literally doing nothing but trying to split up the board. They constantly complain about every single action ever taken by anyone of the staff or anyone who tries to argue against their bullshit. These people are cancer and should be eradicated. Has no one seriously noticed a trend with these people?
>>227497 Fuck off coomertoast everyone can see sages cum dripping from your ruined anal passage
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
>>227523 Real boomerposting hours who up? >everythings fine geez I danno waat u kidza complainin abaaat
(140.13 KB 680x977 499.jpg)
(36.03 KB 320x220 big thonk.jpg)
>Despite making a minority of the population trannies make up most of the e-drama. Really gets my noggin joggin
>>227564 You mean /pol/tards make up all of the drama on this shithole of a board despite being allegedly in the minority.
Jannies, couldn't you theoretically ban use of certain images? It would get rid of the recent zionist shitposter.
>>227564 To know who rules, ask who you can not criticize.
>>227582 Actually, yes, it is possible to do that. Currently lynxchan lacks the capability to do so, however.
>>227582 You can just throw a nearly invisible filter on the pic and then post it again. Pointless tbh.
>>227523 yes, ban fucking everyone who triggers you I propose to start from imperialists it's not like we're been through this already deleting idpol gulag was a mistake, now assblasted faggots tasted the blood in the water and want to ban everyone
>>227954 >t. idpol poster filled with venomous rage
critical support for moderation against idpol gang
>>227954 >deleting idpol gulag was a mistake It wasn't. <It was leaking constantly. <Its activity made it so that if new people came to this site, it would be likely that that cancerous blob would be one of the first things they see. <The thread was attracting /pol/yps who realised that they could troll as much as they wanted without consequences.
>>228201 If your going to wordfilter then change them all into ->jannie
>>228210 sorry I deleted that post I'm the one who made it
>>228224 Now my post is just sitting there all awkward-like, what the fuck man.
>>228173 >leaking which is what jannies are for >attracts /pol/ precisely, it keeps the /pol/ filth in a gulag thread >first things they see instead they'll see it spread in dollops all over other threads, how helpful!
>>227981 >conceited sage poster talking about others having rage how hilarious.
Hello mods here is a suggestion, if a thread is 'troublesome' or someshit, move it to an appropriate board >>>/gulag/ >>>/GET/ or in the case of things like animu and anti-animu rants >>>/hobby/ 4chan and 8chan both had the option to transfer threads from one board to another (usually /trash/) so why not do the same? It would save you the people bitching about deleted threads and save you the effort of cleaning up cringe on the main board.
>>228342 >namefag talking about conceit how hilarious.
(129.86 KB 540x540 huh.png)
>>228361 >namefag ...did you take your meds today?
>>228351 Mods, please move every incel thread to /GET/.
(51.42 KB 431x267 average polish child.jpg)
>>228370 >namefags as "Anonymous" >s-schizo! Retard alert.
>>228408 >Anonymous is a namefag now <not taking meds >>schizo <all meds are for schizos now Is there something you're not telling us?
>>228397 This unironically
>>227954 Lmao the incelposter still haven’t left despite insisting he would when the thread was deleted.
>>228579 >everyone who dislike the bans is incel poster lol
>>228342 >not understanding by now that sage is more than one person and always has been Sage is in me. Sage is in all of us
>>228046 Yes we should moderate them into a gulag thread where they stay
>>227954 Lmao 100% at this point i kind of want it to happen just so I can say >first as tragedy then as farce And then just fucking kill my self
>>228579 Incelposter will never leave. He will sit here in 2054 and screech about roasties and Chad.
>>228866 >2 feminists still jerking themselves off over incels t. eggcels.
(236.45 KB 1870x628 pol-disgusting-raid.png)
Reminder to be less lax against far-right trolls on here (that includes "nazbols", who are more than likely just /pol/acks using the shit meme in their favor this time to ultimately degrade our imageboard).
>>228922 The nazbol thread in /GET/ is a meme thread. Nazbols are a meme. I agree though, we need to stay on our toes.
>>228922 pic is from September last year, please don't stir up a purity spiral, I've seen less pol-baiting recently.
>>228939 There are three new active far-right threads the past day that are still active and bumping. Two on /leftypol/ and one on /GET/. >please don't stir up a purity spiral We are pure of fascists, that is one of the big advantages of having got a chan of our own now, with high post count. I have no sympathy with your sentiment.
>>229112 Whatbthreads specifically? Just curious.
>>229112 I mean, part of the deal here is that leftypol has always worked to reeducate fascista away from their ideology into our camp. They are disheartened with the way things are going just as much as any of us. The issue is that they have, up to this point, had a much larger platform to advocate their politics. Nothing is going to change by shutting it all out. That why they are allowed to post here as long as they aren't being trolls or actively trying to shit up the board so that we can deconstruct their arguments. That being said if there is an active campaign against us then things are going to get more difficult, but, there can be no movement forward with out conflict. Such is the nature of our political situation.
>>229144 >>228303 (done this one billion times, no sage etiquette, eyesore) >>228759 (extremely low effort) >>/GET/49252 (romanticizing Nazbols)
>>229197 >>>/GET/49252 (romanticizing Nazbols) *
>>229150 >I mean, part of the deal here is that leftypol has always worked to reeducate fascista away from their ideology into our camp. I think this is very misguided. >The issue is that they have, up to this point, had a much larger platform to advocate their politics. They still do. They are more successfully using entryism to solidify their narrative across the whole of 4chan contemporaneously. >Nothing is going to change by shutting it all out. It may very well improve the socialist comprehension of the userbase on here when we can focus on collective education, skill-sharing, media editing and artistic creativity doubling as propaganda. >That why they are allowed to post here as long as they aren't being trolls or actively trying to shit up the board It spills over every time. And the reactionary posting almost never gets patrolled since we don't have that many mods and the speed of conversation in-thread is increasing. Hence it's directly degrading the level of conversation and send a really bad message to apoliticals, center-rightists, center-leftists and apoloticals which are a far larger demographic anyways and at this point in time have a higher chance of getting wind of us, since we're not longer a non-index 8chan appendage but a communist chan with a growing online reputation. >That being said if there is an active campaign against us then things are going to get more difficult Why would you as an idoelogical enemy always be aware of when or when that is the case? >but, there can be no movement forward with out conflict. Historically that meant killing nazis. Now it's you humanizing them and pretending they, who currently dominante us both virtually and politically, should, what, be argued with? What a laughably liberal position. >Such is the nature of our political situation. In 8chan it made sense, not anymore. Advance.
>>229203 For the record I'm not against outright banning them. I just see a lot of issues with it. Witch hunts are becoming an ever more prominent thing . Where do we draw the line? Should people who say nigger or faggot haph hazardously be banned? I don't agree with that. I do agree with many of your points. I think this chan is better served as a Haven for leftist culture but we have historically converted many of them awaybfrom their reactionary politics. I have seen many threads here where reactionaries have come out as turning away from their politics. You can call it liberal, or, what ever ideological spook you want to throw around, but, ultimately their ideas can be changed. The thing about leftypol is we have commonly been associated with the "dirt bag left" by our more liberal peers and this gives us a Segway into their ideology just as they used their edgy nature as a Segway into the minds of apoliticals and center right conservative types.
>>228339 >which is what jannies are for Why should we have an containment thread when it clearly doesn't work? > it keeps the /pol/ filth in a gulag thread I think you misunderstood me here. It attracts /pol/yps to this board and keeps them on this site. >instead they'll see it spread in dollops all over other threads, how helpful! The idpol thread was mostly just uncontested complaining about trannies and woman by a few incels. Currently we may have some incel thread now and then but at least people call him retarded for it and it doesn't come of as board consensus >>229199 >posting nazbol memes >how do I get a nazbol gf >how do I become the nazbol gf >I also would like a nazbol gf I can argue with all the time but I'm not white That doesn't really seem serious.
>>229260 "Dirtbag left" is the label Chapo Trap House socdems use desperately in their lack of any genuine "edge", having adopted such an impotent political position. We are communists; edgy by nature. We also are channers. These in combination create a very subversive soil to work off of. Anonymous cyber-communist anti-capitalism, to be explicit. A return of certain traditions of chan-culture is in need; of infographics for teaching lefty-specific skills (free/open source software / networks, graphical design, stencils, comedic writing, electronic music, preparing entryism for scheduled events / happenings, the list goes on). We're a swarm intelligence without barriers for posting. Remember the potential with this, especially if managed intelligently. I cede the point on letting them be as long as they're arguing in good faith / being open to conversion, but I'd here advocate a modifier to deny them the privilege of an OP image, both for countering their intended tactic of visual ideological dissemination / pollution, but also for the pleasure of denying them the agency usually afforded to them in their usual spaces of operation.
>>229337 >Remember the potential with this, especially if managed intelligently. A point well taken >deny them the privilege of an OP image I support this fully. Their propoganda doesn't have a place here.
>>229337 Wow that was a cringe as fuck post. How did you even manage to write that and then hit post?
>>229360 Don't feed the troll.
>>229360 [TRIGGERED]
>>229375 Disregard that I suck cock
>>229402 Hey guys, troll here. just letting you know I'll be shitposting so you can ignore me since comatoast is doing so as well.
>>229412 >>229412 We need to unanchor the sage thread, lol.
test
This may be a stupid request, but considering that the ID/pol/lacks are still here Could you guys consider the following filters: Tranny > "Semen Demon" Troon > "Semen Demon" incel > "sex haver"
(32.56 KB 340x444 1148490216.jpg)
>>229524 I'm gonna post this idea here since it won't be seen in the shit heap. I propose an offsite (preferably) or sticky crowd written catechism and book-list for idiots and faggots like storm-niggers and perma-virgins, which will serve as a minimum for people seeking to shit up the board. Anybody who shows they haven't done the homework first in their OP gets their post deleted. It'll probably cut down on the trolling since trolls are lazy scumfucks, and at least HOPEFULLY elevate the level of dialogue for the remaining genuine debate threads.
>>229551 That and implement a hide post/thread. If you aren't going to do anything about anything, at least let me fucking ignore the festering sores
hey mods, wake up. We haven't just one but two threads that need to be moderated >>228795 >>229400 >>229599 press on the " ⃠ " symbol next to the post/thread, you should have it as an option.
>>229603 Thanks mate, you're an MVP
>>229551 honestly recommending this as part of the catechism/reading https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1913/mar/x01.htm
>>230328 Nice Honestly it should probably be short things like this, and maybe summaries of longer works that need to be on there, like Origins
(12.49 KB 327x195 leftypol discussions.jpg)
>>229524 Reminder that this is what the average IDpol thread looks like.
>>230821 >Not ctrl+f "dilate" Do you even idpol?
(2.66 KB 327x51 dilate leftypol.jpg)
>>231071 Why do /pol/tards even use that insult? Its so soulless
>>231118 Because it works
>>231121 DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS.
>>231224 Disregard that, I D I L A T E.
>>231268 Disregard that, I had sex
>>230328 >The Marxist doctrine is omnipotent because it is true. rekt
test
>>203786 I use a VPN because I live in a shithole country, but 99% of time I get the "YOUR IP WAS RECOGNIZED AS KNOWN SPAMMER" bullshit pop up, I just want to meme mate
Why was this >>231642 bumplocked? Because I mentioned a youtuber? Would it be acceptable if I just posted "Is Iran an imperialist state? Discuss" without linking to Hakim's video?
>>231661 >low effort thread >literal /pol/ tier "is X a Y? look at this eceleb! Discuss." <why was it bumplocked???? lol.
>>231692 It was "low effort" I guess because I didn't write much myself but I was genuinely hoping it would generate some discussion because there seems to be split between Marxists who view Iran as a regional imperialist power and Marxists who believe the opposite. I included Hakim's video because it was relevant and could potentially be a starting point for discussion. He also seems to be pretty well liked around here.
>>231703 Threads here can stay a long time, so mods like to be a bit strict on this. If you want an easy way around it, you can just find a random article on Iran and copy paste a paragraph or two. Jannies never notice as long as the thread is looks like it's in good faith. Alternative just post it in one of our many cancerous generals like /usapol/. They are dying for content anyways.
>>231580 It's cloudflair, our upstream provider. My VPN was working fine and just got blocked a few weeks ago.
>>231703 If you want it to be a starting point for discussion, then why don't you start the discussion by taking the time to elaborate on and then share your thoughts
(44.48 KB 458x487 alunya-x-girunya.jpg)
Having traveled through the plains of /gulag/ and /GET/ I've now collected the inventory needed for my arrival to the /HotPocket/ oasis with the all the refined goods ready at hand!
(1.57 KB 16x16 f-hns-y.png)
(335.00 B 16x11 f-black.png)
Batch 1/2 Improvements over present roster: · The historically accurate hammer and sickle (first official use in referenced emblem, 1922). The yellow hammer and sickle is the original color-scheme and the one used in the vast majority of its following iterations. The current red one is a quick resize from Wikipedia, but is seldom used in reality, and at about the same interval as the white version (both equally rare in use in comparison to the popularity of the yellow). · The historically accurate black flag. The current "A for Anarchy" is, I believe, a pop-culture reference to "V for Vendetta" and is thus more suitable for a flag on /GET/, as /leftypol/ facilitates mostly econo-political and historical discussion (as observed from the rest of the selection of flags on the board). * The odd flag for reference.
(4.00 KB 17x16 f-rb-star.png)
(1.07 KB 16x16 f-kapd.png)
(5.15 KB 17x16 f-red-star.png)
Batch 2/2 · The red & black bisected star. This symbol is used by organizational anarcho-communists influenced by Nestor Makhno's pamphlet 'The Platform'; influencing the organizational school called platformism. With this addition we could re-name the current red & black flag to 'Anarcho-Syndicalism' and give the name "Anarcho-Communism" to the red & black star, as the flag in question was used by the CNT-FAI anarcho-syndicalist trade union in Spain, and the red & black star was inspired by the work of an anarcho-communist revolutionary. · The red disc of the council communist KAPD ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KAPD ). The current umbrella usage of 'leftcom' and its flag/symbol is in fact rather etymologically specific to Bordigism, as council communists had quite distinct theory, symbology and even self-described as 'council communist' over 'left-communist' most of the time, especially as the years went by (within the context of the first half of the 20th century). 'Leftcom', by contrast, was commonly used in self-reference by Bordigists. · A red star for a general communist symbol. The red star indeed had its origins in Russian civil war, with the Bolsheviks, but as the decades went - the red star became less directly associated with the USSR/ML, while the hammer and sickle took a stronger form of that association. The first distanciation happened with the use of the red star by generally left-wing organizations of anti-fascists during WWII, then of generally left-wing orgs of national liberation, later yet of the libertarian communist guerilla of the Zapatistas and then finally by the libertarian communist Communalists of Rojava and CUP in Spain today. I would personally use this, as I am sympathetic to the writings of the left-communists, Communalism and Cockshott. Cheers!
(5.12 KB 17x16 f-r-star.png)
>>232108 <Improved edges of red star.
>>232103 >The historically accurate black flag. that looks a lot like this flag
(1.74 KB 75x71 rb-star.png)
(3.33 KB 252x240 r-star.png)
>>232123 Odd. I can't seem to scale down the red star as well as the red & black one, as my editor (can't get Paint.NET referenced in this guide >>>/ref/645 ) GIMP removes the shadows on the edges at save for some reason I can't figure out. Sources: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fe/Rb-star.svg/75px-Rb-star.svg.png https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Red_star.svg/252px-Red_star.svg.png
(409.00 B 17x16 red star.png)
>>232167 >I can't seem to scale down the red star as well as the red & black one Let me help you, anon
>>232172 Thank you ♥
(688.67 KB 1024x1055 State_Emblem_of_the_Soviet_Union.png)
(221.32 KB 800x954 Warsaw_Pact_Logo.png)
(517.00 B 13x11 get_cpsu.png)
Since we are on the topic, any chance flags for WPO or the USSR could be added? We have ones for most leftist countries that ever existed, even shit like Cambodia. Soviet flag is obviously shit for 16x16 format, but what about logos like these? Also GET already has a soviet flag (pic 3). Also, what happened to the plan of replacing all the flags with new HD ones with double the size? I recall seeing them all posted and they looked real good.
all these flags and still no Mao flag dafuck
>>232124 It's because >>232183 >>232167 >>232195 Are so obviously reddit tier it hurts.
>>232124 No, it isn't. That flag appeared in the post-internet era after post-left anarchists (one of the youngest anarchist tendencies) got more into the historical Russian nihilist movement (who had no such symbology). For most of the time anarchists only use red, black or the red/black bisect up until very recently. >>232528 Damn you're insecure.
>>232548 Damn you're reddit.
(37.40 KB 583x436 anal.png)
>>232559 Here's your (You) ♥♥♥
>>232565 infact I am willing to be you are probably underage.
>>232568 Send me a picture of your ID and I'll send you mine.
>>232616 On some real shit I want that ID
Why did a mod straight-up delete my thread on cybernetic confederalism? Not bumplock - removal. It was just a normal fucking thread that a). had a topic originated on the board b). contained OC about said topic and c). concern communist theory. I had t double-check catalog several times as I refused to believe this janitorial decision.
>>232830 I think some jannie has a big hardon for general threads, hence bumplocking threads like the "Is Iran imperialist, Hakim says so" thread because it wasn't in eceleb thread, or deleting yours since it wasn't in the cybernetics thread.
>>232830 We have a thread for it already.
>>232864 Nope, it's simply to keep the board clean of a ton of the same topics. It's that simple really.
>>232864 But it isn't squarely a Cockshott thread though. It intersects his theory with that of Bookchin/Ocalan, thus the new thread. >>232869 >Nope, it's simply to keep the board clean of a ton of the same topics. It's that simple really. But this is a new topic arising spontaneously from several different anons conclusions from reading theory and seeing paralells and an opening for a new path. There is no thread on this subject, there isn't even a paper yet, just communication on /leftypol/ and exactly three memes.
>>232874 Is it a Cyber socialist topic?
>>232935 Yeah so why don't we just create one general /socialism/ thread and delete all other threads about specific socialist theories/ideologies/strategies then? You know as well as I do that "cybernetic socialism" is associated with Cockshott's theory specifically. My reasoning for why the 'cybernetic confederalism' thread shouldn't have been DELETED was sound, but instead of ceding the point now you've just defaulted to grasping at straws.
(523.40 KB 1080x767 reddit weather.png)
>>232528 >>232559 Everything you don't like isn't 'reddit', shut the fuck up.
>>233033 Cybernetic Socialism as a concept way out paced cockshot. You're just trying to shoehorn Jim into the concept of Communistic transhumanism in order to justify your thread taking up space on the board. Project harder fag.
>>233167 Reminder, seething fags like this mean we are doing something right.
>>232830 >>232864 >>233088 Jannies aren’t autistic fucking retards that’s why. Bourgeois wreckers
>>233033 Lmao this is the end result everything goes in a communism general and all discussions are squelched into one shit one
>>233191 >praising yourself Shut the fuck up comatoast nobody’s likes you
>>233209 >We How fucking retarded can you possibly be?
Why’d the jannies delete all my posts demanding proof that worker conditions in China have improved and that workers hurt by factory owners were made whole. LMAO, this going to be an ML hug box again?
>>233508 >this going to be an ML hug box again? It's indeed approaching that again and it's seriously pissing me the fuck off - as this time around there not only were an established catastrophic precedent that almost destroyed the community in direct relation to this, but also the stated mission goal of this imageboard is supposed to be "leftist non-sectarianism" and there is clearly an increasing pro-ML & socdem bias, with heavy-handed censorship of anarchist, libertarian Marxist and Communalist content. They evade criticism by maintaining 100 different administrative policies simultaneously (1 week it's quality control, second it's shitpost central, third it's only generals allowed) all decided in a demcent, condescending fashion, while the "ironic" Hoxhaism increasingly becomes post-ironic, echoing the mistakes of another "politically incorrect" board we strove to never become as reckless as.
>>232830 would you mind posting OP in the cockshott thread and linking to it here so we can gauge whether it makes sense to make a new thread about it or not?
>>233508 >>233562 You have some serious shit to answer if you're doing this, janitors.
>>233562 I fucking warned you all. 6 months ago I warned you. "Low quality", "no trolling", etc. are vague trash rules that are guaranteed to be abused eventually. I fucking warned you.
>>233508 It are times like these that I wish i could see in the logs what you wrote. >>233562 >It's indeed approaching that again It's somewhat strange that you think that because from my perspective there has been an increase in anarchist posters as of late. maybe that's just because they decided to use flags. >there is clearly an increasing pro-ML bias, with heavy-handed censorship of anarchist, libertarian Marxist and Communalist content. What are these threads? >>232239 >>189248 >>220804 >>207975 >>197833 >>192246 >socdem bias How did you even come up with this one? I've never heard someone claiming he got banned for criticizing the rosa killers. >1 week it's quality control, second it's shitpost central That's an improvement, tbh. >third it's only generals allowed yeah jannies can be a little too harsh on this one .
>>233608 >It are times like these that I wish i could see in the logs what you wrote. same tbh but hopefully we will have that capacity soon-ish.
>>233608 >there is clearly an increasing pro-ML bias, with heavy-handed censorship of anarchist, libertarian Marxist and Communalist content. >What are these threads? Keep pretending that quietly deleting post, anchoring and deleting threads that hurts the fee fees of ML jannies isn’t censorship.
>>233626 Can you give some concrete examples of that happening.
>>233630 Yes, I’m the corona virus thread. At least two of my posts were deleted criticizing the CCP.
>>233638 Anything more than that?
>>233639 No, not off the top of my head. Isn’t that enough? Why don’t you have this site log the comments. And fuck off with this burden of proof shit, the jannies have the power to cover everything up and delete whatever they want. They need to be held to account and not have retards like you come in and demand anons remember what posts they made.
>>233639 There’s been others but I’ve only recently made it a point to mentally track my old posts. Why is so much of the burden on me. I’m not the one with power.
>>233645 I would be more concerned about the moderation if you could point to more than two posts deleted. I don't want the pro-ML bias back but I haven't seen any indication of that.
>>233647 >rejecting american propaganda is ML bias wew
>>233665 >Corona virus happens on CCPs watch because of filthy meat markets allowed to operate unchecked by them. >Blaming them for the failure is American propaganda. So who is to blame?
>>233626 >anchoring threads that hurts the fee fees of ML jannies These are all anchored threads Which ones of those threads are anti-ML >>231485 >>224474 >>228214 >>224711 >>222693 >>219411 >>218642 >>194440 >>218905 >>187808 >>217113 >>216949 >>216931 >>216051 >>205501 >>202927 >>199873 >deleting threads that hurts the fee fees of ML jannies Can you link to a post of someone complaining that his thread got deleted because it critical of ML ideologie? >>233645 >Why don’t you have this site log the comments. That isn't inplemented yet. It definitely should be implemented, to. >And fuck off with this burden of proof shit, the jannies have the power to cover everything up and delete whatever they want. They need to be held to account and not have retards like you come in and demand anons remember what posts they made. Yes the mods should be held accountable, but we shouldn't just blindly believe the accusations of random anons. >>233665 >>233669 Just a reminder . This is the moderation thread. Not the Corona thread.
>>233645 >Why don’t you have this site log the comments. Because we don't have the tech to do that yet. FFS.
>>233681 When a mod deletes your fascist shit, come here and complain. Don't come to the mod thread and randomly make claims that in the summer of 1942 your were raped by a ghost and we should believe you because it's rude not to or some shit.
>>233687 >Shitting on the CCP is fascist. With how badly they exploit workers, if anything not shitting on them is fascist.
>>233683 >pretending to not know anchored threads fall off the catalog. the last thread on the catalog is 20 days old. Surely that should be enough time to see pro-ML sentiment among moderators >There’s one in this thread. >>233562 <links to your own post and 2 posts are not a thread. >This isn’t a court of law. If enough people complain that alone should give the complaints some credibility especially when it’s about things that anons have been complaining about for years. Let me get this straight, are we talking about whether mods have a ML-bias or are we talking about them too quickly bumplocking / deleting threads. Because those seem to be two separate issues.
antious why did you delete this post? >>233683
>>233697 >the last thread on the catalog is 20 days old. >Surely that should be enough time to see pro-ML sentiment among moderators Lol the jannies deleted my response to you ITT. I’m it going to spend hours to rifle through all the anchored threads just to prove to you something wholly plausible. People have been complaining about ML bias for years. >There’s one in this thread. >>233562 <links to your own post No, it links to someone else’s posts. >Let me get this straight, are we talking about whether mods have a ML-bias or are we talking about them too quickly bumplocking / deleting threads. >Because those seem to be two separate issues. No they’re the same issue of jannies censoring shit they don’t like. I personally didn’t complain about the threads being anchored, but I’ve certainly seen it. One person ITT complained that his cybernetic thread got anchored.
>>233700 (me) I was not suporive of him. but deleting it only makes you look bad
>>233704 >Lol the jannies deleted my response to you ITT yeah, I know I made these posts >>233700 >>233705 I'm taking screenshots currently, just in case >I’m it going to spend hours to rifle through all the anchored threads just to prove to you something wholly plausible. I feel like I have to say this Over the last 6 months I've heard people accuse the mods of being: pedos, racist white supremacists, radlib SJWs, trying to destroy the boards culture, ... So I feel that there needs to be a reasonable amount of proof of any accusation before we can rally against the moderation. > People have been complaining about ML bias for years. Yes, but that was under old BO, things have somewhat changed since then >No, it links to someone else’s posts. Oh, sorry for getting that one wrong >No they’re the same issue of jannies censoring shit they don’t like. I disagree because the reason why it gets anchored / deleted is different. When sage sperged out last week, it was mostly about low quality and off-topic threads. As far as I understand your not complaining about that, but about the mods having an ideological bias. >One person ITT complained that his cybernetic thread got anchored. That one got deleted. probably not because the mods have anything again cybernetic socialism but because they want that people use the general. That thread probably shouldn't have been deleted, tho
(94.68 KB 630x840 stalin-marx.jpg)
>>233673 >>233645 is referencing >>232830 , the "cybernetic Communalism / confederalism" thread that got straight-up deleted for no reason. I make it, first response is a reaction image of an ML pepe giving me (the OP) the finger. I think nothing of it and respond with pic related (the ML pepe was posting as anonymous btw) and then go off to bed. I wake up to find the thread very atypically stealth-removed from the catalog, no explanation. Now my speculation here is that the person I responded with pic related to was an anon-posting staffer without self-awareness, so they took this personal and decided to 'get the last laugh' by 'showing me' by flexing their mod privileges and removing my thread, just like bAsEd StAlIn. Keep in mind that threads normally get bumplocked with a mod-reason given, this even applies to lowkey nazi astroturfing most of the time. Now, of course I don't have screenshots for this, as this debacle was completely unpredictable and I was surprised that it happened, so I have to count on other anons who were online at that time to confirm that this thread existed, please reply to this message with something like "saw it" or something. It's quite a convenient little reverse-perk for the staff, isn't it? We all had mod logs back in the chan we emigrated from, both sites code are open source - why wasn't this implemented several years ago when the site was first written? It seems like a copy-paste:able fix.
>>233745 >Over the last 6 months I've heard people accuse the mods of being: pedos, racist white supremacists, radlib SJWs, trying to destroy the boards culture, ... I’ve never seen anyone accuse a jannie of being a pedo. You’re just trying to make criticism of jannies look crazy. >So I feel that there needs to be a reasonable amount of proof of any accusation before we can rally against the moderation. There needs to be a way for people to reasonably provide proof, like public logs that record thread subjects and the content of deleted posts before you imply people are complaining on bad faith. Again, this has been a chronic problem for years and many of the jannies are hold overs from the old BO.
Hey man, I just woke up. I have been at work. Rather than make accusations and outright lies and frI deleted the thread because A: threads that belong in a general do not need to be on the board taking up space in my personal opinion. I think having a shit load of anchored threads looks horrible. If you want to remake the thread though and everyone else on the board, or at least here, feels like it can be its own thread then I am more than willing to let your post be on the board.
>>233750 The mod who deleted your thread thought it was basically a duplicate of the cybernetic socialism thread. >it was a salty mod nope >there are no logs Check the op of this very thread you are in right now. https://bunkerchan.xyz/logs.js?boardUri=leftypol >just copy pasta the code bro They are written in completely different frameworks. Doing something like logging every action a mod does is neither simple nor a matter of copy paste. >everything that happens is a conspiracy against the common man wew
>>233750 >why wasn't this implemented several years ago when the site was first written? (because neither i nor space wrote the code the site runs on. Unlike hotwheels I can not spend full time programming shit for free, because i do not get disability bucks)
>>233778 can you guys not ask one of the users of the site for help? I remember seeing someone in /gulag/ who was willing.
>>233793 We are looking into doing something like that soon tm. But for the moment, I will have a ton of free time after 7 days from now, at which point i can finally start working off items from the backlog. The current mod tools are fucking terrible, but adding all the features to make it more usable isnt a small task.
>>233801 A mod who does a little coding on the site did a very nice code onboarding post I'd planned to use to try help out a while ago, but it got eaten by the speed of the board before I got around to it I'd been planning on doing a let's help out with bunkerchan thread on /tech/ when it returns because the slow speed of of /tech/ was handy for this sort of thing, and then ask here on the mod thread for someone to post an project onboarding post in that thread
>>233815 Sounds good, but please explain what a "project onboarding post" is because i am retared
>>233817 Where the working repositories are a basic overview of the technology used, is it nodejs, php, lisp and how the various parts of the code interact especially client server interactions so on so forth
>>233855 Ah ok >writing your backend in lisp calm down there son im not that autistic
>>233774 >everything that happens is a conspiracy against the common man >wew >trivializing complaints after they’re too many to handwave it away. Everytime.
>>233885 >A hand full of autistics out of almost 400 users are just too much to handle :^)) In all seriousness though, in much the same way mods try to hand wave shit away most of the time, you guys >>233750 have nasty habit of trying to push, out right, paranoia to divide the board and even go as far as straight up lying and manipulation in a bout of what can only be described as paranoid autism. You aren't special, anon. No one is out to get you. Most of these issues could be resolved by simple open and honest discussion rather than jumping to brash conclusions and immediately trying to burn down the house you are living in.
>>233917 Again with this paranoia bullshit. He’s not saying there’s a conspiracy, he’s saying he pissed off one Stalin weeaboo mod and that mod retaliated.
>>233923 I deleted the thread because multiple threads about the same topic don't need to be on the board. That just takes up space for, you know, quality threads or other threads in general. Now, the validity of whether or not the thread that started all of this deserves to be confined to the cyber socialist thread or not is up for debate; As was stated in a previous post, Post it in the cybersocialism general and see what the general consensus is. I'll oblige to that, as I always have. As far as regards to people talking about the janitor who deleted posts that didn't agree with him, we are talking to him about currently. If the janitor in question was removing posts in this thread that disagreed with him there would be logs of such an event. The posts against the Chinese government were basically uniformly considered not the right measure to take (none of which would be necessary.) Thank you.
>>233917 >dat flag That’s kaiserreich shit I rate it.
Do we REALLY need a new "guys who bernie sanders" thread very week. Shouldn't it be sent to the burger thread?
Mods/Admin please add the flags posted further up in the thread
>>234189 We decided some time ago that general threads are voluntary, so no, please just don't use topics you don't like.
>>234233 But also, OP should've looked in the catalog, there's enough bernie threads. It's too late to do something about it now though. USE THE FUCKING CATALOG!
doesn't make sense we can have 3 bernie threads but only one about cybersocialism
>All these /idpol/yps being send to Kolyma So are the jannies finally doing their jobs? Absolutely based

Delete
Report

no cookies?