/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

Proletariat without Borders

Mode: Reply

Max message length: 8192


Max file size: 20.00 MB

Max files: 3


(used to delete files and postings)


Remember to follow the rules

/leftypol/ is a non-sectarian board for leftist discussion.

IRC: Rizon.net #bunkerchan

(56.71 KB 540x540 85557222.jpg)
(183.15 KB manifesto.pdf)
Rules, Moderation and Manifesto Feedback. Anonymous Board volunteer 01/08/2020 (Wed) 09:46:23 No. 203786
REMINDER TO VISIT >>>/hobby/ Don't: -spam -post cuckshit, "commies BTFO," or any of that kind of shit -post any porn depicting underage (including drawings) -attempt to cloak reactionary politics in left-wing rhetoric (Strasserism, "Nazbol" Strasserism, National "Socialism," Zionism, "Die cis scum"/"Kill all white men" SJW shit) -incite specific acts of terrorism or similar acts (use your head, don't act like a fed) -post idpol Do: -be respectful, ask questions, and know your place if you're a reactionary -feel free to flame, shitpost, and be sectarian if you are a leftist (just keep it somewhat within reason) If you think that the mod team hasn't responded to your request in a satisfactory manner or that it was ignored, you can now contact us directly at [email protected] Comatoast, the vol who kindly proposed this, checks this email account everyday day but might not respond immediately due to work. You can check any activity on this board, including the activity of the mod team (ban, deletions, etc...) here : https://bunkerchan.xyz/logs.js?boardUri=leftypol You can find the manifesto in a pdf appended to this post /GET/ is Bunkerchan's general/shitposting board and /ref/ its international board. leftybooru https://lefty.booru.org/index.php Meta Discussion: Extraordinary Commission For Bunker Affairs: >>>/gulag/768 Development of Bunkerchan: >>>/gulag/3941
Edited last time by antious666 on 01/22/2020 (Wed) 16:49:23.
(249.52 KB 1280x960 1579230201757.jpg)
Hey Sages, just letting you know I'll be making a trip so you can recognize me since Sage is doing so as well.
i am also sage
hahahaha me too im sage
(16.91 KB 474x278 ghtyutyu.jpeg)
>>224686 >>224680 >>224685 We're all sage down here brothers.
hahahaha also sage ahahah
How many levels of Sage are you guys on right now?
(158.48 KB 799x534 Sage.jpg)
Quick post something only Sage would know or else your a fake
>>224716 Heh... Watch this... Compared to me you are like a little baby
>>224727 >namefagging Imagine being such an attention whore, filtered idiot.
>>224768 If we're all sage then no one is sage
in these dire times, saging is newfagging, and bumping is oldfaggotry.
>>224776 And when no one is sage then everyone is Sage. We are all Sage. Sage lives in us
>>224782 Sage lives in me
>tfw you boogie man so hard everyone adopts your name I am the real sage *not* smugpepe.jpg
How much Sage could a Sagecuck cuck If a Sagecuck could cuck Sage? As much Sage as a Sagecuck could cuck, If a Sagecuck could cuck Sage.
>>224788 Sage lives in me. He lives in you too.
>>224824 Sage came in my asshole too
>>224839 Hey Sage, Sage here. Just letting you know my ass is tarnished. Thanks
Ok. fags. you wanna sage-post go to the dedicated sage post thread.
(124.26 KB 484x515 1409093848207.jpg)
>>224847 >go to the dedicated sage post thread >t. Jannie Sage (no trip edition)
>>224694 >We're all sage down here brothers. Holy shit. This scares me. We really are becoming sage. I saw your post and was like >WTF! >:( Why did sage steal my post and nobody even replied to sage? Then I looked at the times and I was like: >I stole sage's post? WTF! https://bunkerchan.xyz/leftypol/res/224711.html#q224934
Why does comatose keep deleting popular threads?
>>225176 He deleted the ideal communist thread wtf
>>225177 It was a good thread with like 90 replies most of which were effortposts what the actual fuck
>>225176 What threads are you talking about?
>>225177 because sageposting is only allowed in the dedicated sage post thread.
>>225226 oh that thread. Yeah. Some one was necro bumping it. It was old and becoming an eyesore. No one was actually responding too it. So I deleted it.
>>225221 The one with the nukes for example.
>>225231 Thread was becoming idpol 2.0. I had to delete probably about 40 posts in under an hour between a Nazi and some liberal. It had devolved into meaningless shit flinging. I gave it a chance to get back on its feet and it kept devolving into meaningless shit flinging idpol. Nothing of value was lost.
>>225233 >I am too lazy to do my job so innocent bystanders have to get nuked Even doing nothing would have been better.
(32.96 KB 600x399 trghrgtrtg.jpeg)
>>225240 At a certain point things become so unbearable they need to just be nuked. It doesn't matter what I say to you because you will just move the goal post further and further to find a reason to complain.
>>225240 The thread was Twitter levels of bad. It needed to go anyways. It was literally inviting the idpol.
uncritical support for idpol nuking
>>225272 You mean you disagreed. If the offtopicposters don't sage the offtopicposters deserve displacement. Censoring the innocent, however, shouldn't be forgiven. (I suspect they will still)
>>225425 Oh woe is the plight of those posting with in the "Hot takes thread!" Woe is them. Truly, we have faultered today, on this day, the day by which we have KILLED GOD. How can we recover? How will we, the murders of all murders be forgiven for our transgressions? GOD IS DEAD AND WE HAVE KILLED HIM.
>>225434 Don't trivialize and divert, you know a better job could've been done at modding. Are you drunk or something?
>>225450 It is your opinion that this is a big deal and its my opinion that it isn't. It's also the opnion of the mod the the thread needed to go. The mod makes the calls, ultimately. He made a judgment call. You are acting like it is some type of attack against you personally. Every single t slashed and I dotted. It's nothing but being vindictive. Rather than offer up anything constructive you are just throwing a temper tantrum and trying to act like you are "ze ultimate revolutionary (TM)" rather than just taking things for what they are and offering a more constructive criticism. Maybe I am not trivializiy anything. Maybe you are just making this a bigger deal than it actually is.
>>225425 >>225425 I mean at some point you have to do something to actually git rid of the problem. If the thread is a honeypot for idpol then the thread is the issue and the thread needs too go.
>>225465 I'm trying to put forward legit criticisms that the mod in question has been too brash in deleting the entire thing. You just keep accusing me of being "mad", while you feel the need to smugpost with ancient images. (I know how big our folders are, you're putting in the extra effort here. You know you need to defend and deflect.) >take things for what they are, make more constructive criticism A criticism, by definition, is an alternative outlook on how things are. These POVs are mutually exclusive. I'm just calling for putting moderators (especially ones like comatoast) more in the public light, I would like to see him defend himself with the deleted content in question in front of the mod team. But since the mod team is <somewhere> and they tend to discuss things in their own secret IRC or whatever, next best thing is indeed throwing around a bunch of random arguments and performing costly signaling that this is an issue at least some care about. (and hoping that someone somewhere notices) It makes perfect sense for the userbase to deeply distrust any sort of overt moderative overaction. The community has already split over this, and it can't and shouldn't take BS like that again. So curb your spinning of truths. A thread didn't just die, it was murdered for having no idpol exhaust elsewhere. Also the thread OP needs to be edited again: it says "don't post idpol out of containthread", but apparently there's a casus to delete any thread that two posters can fuck up in five flames. So much for being Fedresistant >>225484 Everyone knew deleting idpol containment would cause widespread idpolposting. Any thread that doesn't tell the posters what to post literally could be one. The problem is not gone, just a symptom of it. Unpopular opinion threads have been with us for a long time, and were a great source of disagrees and dialects. If you want to ban these types of threads, publicly announce you will in the OP and tell the userbase you're planning to do so instead of anonymously displacing all the lurking anons whenever.
(808.47 KB 1700x2151 Hegel_by_Schlesinger.jpg)
>>225497 Right but the only way to handle that on an imageboard is through laying out bans and deleting posts. The thread was literally just idpol 2.0; there was debate about deleting it out of the gate from everyone on the team for this exact reason. But, we opted too keep it around and not just delete it outright. Which, we did and it still devolved into what it devolved into. Furthermore we do not have a "Secret irc" the irc is public and anyone can join. I am in there all the time. The thread also, was, not exactly the highest quality. I think it had every reason to be removed. It is known that idpol is a bannable offense here, that's what the thread was. There are instances of idpol were we have agreed to go a bit softer, but, at some point you have to take action, anon. Also, for the record, there has been, as far as I can tell, little to no idpol on the board since the deletion of the thread. It's just when topics that allow for that type of discussion are allowed to continue unabated that they become that. The thread had every reason to be deleted.
>>225512 You, as a moderator, can only view maintaining board opinion through laying out bans and deleting posts. I felt the thread in question (and several more tabs I had to close due to "early 404") was quality and based. It incited discussion and criticisms. Once one fucker started claiming that memebabies spouting antitrans BS are #notmycomrade, it went downhill of course. But leaving the question in the middle does evoke both wehraboo and r/socialism newfaggotry that need to take the stirnerpill. Leaving the opportunity to give it to them will lead to cluelessness spreading through our cybersphere. leftypol always responded to bait. And it was great.
>>225497 Thanks for the feedback about the thread topic, I'll edit it now. Comatoast gave a good answer, just to give you an idea, about the process I asked for feedback about bumplocking the scary pomo frankfurt hate thread >>225140. A vol disagreed, gave their reason, and it seemed reasonable, so I didn't do anything. I'm was monitoring the thread, because I expected it to be shit. As I predicted, there are some shit /pol/-tier takes, but contrary to what I expected, it's manageable enough to not be a /pol/ or idpol honeypot, and OP seemed to be active in the thread, plus some other posters dispelling myths. Turned out to be an OK thread. We make a shit ton of these decisions a day. Sometimes we leave bait threads up because they turn out to be fun threads, sometimes they don't. User feedback is crucial, because we sometimes fuck up. But honestly, people complain of 1 out of 20 mod actions we take. We hear your complaints and take them seriously, sometimes too seriously IMO. Perhaps this was a mistake, I wasn't in the thread and hence can't judge.
>>225528 What discussion and criticisms did the hot take thread incite? Yes it was funny but it resulted in several people shit flinging idpol at one another because topics about race and gender are inevitably going to come out of such a thread. idpol isn't allowed here. I am sorry you feel the way that you do, but, no one really wants it here. I deleted many of the posts and they still kept going on with it. I told them to stop, I made a public post. The real issue here is that bans are meaningless since anyone can just change their IP now. You literally have to sit at a thread for hours on end until they get board and leave and I don't always have time to do that. I am an adult with actual issues in the world, living under the economic system that I do. The sky is not falling because I deleted one nebulous thread that was borderline idpol to begin with. Those types of threads are going to inevitably bring it onto the board.
>>225541 Not all discussion and criticism needs to be publicized to happen. It was fun to try and trigger, and it's in essence important that users trigger themselves to think. Such was the essence of the thread also. If the issue is available man-hours in modding, I'd be glad to help out in any way I can. I agree idpol will be inevitable once again. A better solution is needed. Giving them a board is too much space, giving a thread maybe also. (I wasn't in it often, but felt it was nice that at least some autists were kept out of other places because of it) And the concept of hot takes are memetically important (recently and in the past). Barely borderline idpol by itself, just blametheuserslol Symptomatic treatment that kills not-as-guilty cells is equivalent to heavy chemo. So the better solution is to get the users themselves to selfmoderate and [shitpost mode] spam nihilist-themed gore to exclude idpolfaggots perhaps even?
>>225582 I think right now if you look at the current state of the board the board looks good. There are many quality posts exhibiting much quality discussion and also some hilarious threads too that are presenting much lulz potential. Like I said, too me the thread was an eyesore that needed too go; that being the least of it's issues. And you are correct, not everyone needs to get hit by things like that, but, some times it's going to happen. Not everyone was guilty in the OG idpol thread either but that's how things function some times in places like these. Sometimes sacrifices are made to support the over all strength of the community. All that being said bringing new mods in is something we have been discussing as well. Personally I think we need to clean the more inactive members of the staff. I do support bringing some new people on, personally, though.
>>225582 I approve of heavy chemo against the idpoltards. The board needs to be cleansed.


no cookies?