>>1234210 Biden was literally the #2 man in the administration that started this entire mess

>>1234015 no, they're an insignificant group of militias. At best Assad will keep his word and grant them autonomy.

>>1234087 >Was Stalin supposed to refuse US and British aid during the Second World War? He should have sided with the Axis against the Anglo imperial powers, Hitler and Mussolini were revolutionaries, not my words but the words of Amadeo Bordiga

>>1234015 It will go back to the status quo ante where the Assad clan uses and houses PKK and Turkish communists as a proxy against Turkey for the insurgency in the southeast.

>>1234026 Based and redpilled. Kurds are subhuman t. Baathist

>>1234344 >siding with Turkey to own the kurds You're not anti-imperialist

>>1234345 >not siding with the Assyrians to own the Kurds and the Turks ngmi

>>1234353 Ethnic Chauvanism of any kind, even the Assyrians who are the natives of the area, isn't good or constructive

>>1234344 Reminder that one of the vice presidents of Baathist Iraq was a Kurd

>>1234376 You know what the job of a vice president is when there's more than one of them? Serving the coffee

Hopefully not, it's a NATO project to destroy the Syrian Arab Republic and create another Israeli type ethnic canton.

>2020 >still rojavafagging mein gott

>>1234454 They've been fighting Turkey and its jihadi proxies hand in hand with the Syrian Arab Army since the invasion of Afrin you idiot

>>1234455 >2021 >NOT rojavafagging SMH TBQH onifampaisan >>1234463 Who knows, maybe Gay Sultan will cause Turkey to be expelled from NATO soon.

>>1234491 He won't, Turkey doesn't need NATO but NATO needs Turkey, badly, second largest army and their only station outside of the militarily irrelevant continental Europe

>>1234463 No they haven't. "Rojava" destroyed Raqqa at the behest and with the support of NATO, it should be smashed into dust.

>>1234015 >survive the Syrian Civil War? no, mainly for the issue that their leadership class is fucking retarded They're still acting as an American base in Syria despite the Americans offering them up on a silver platter to Lord Watermelon for some reason

>>1234584 >No they haven't. So I guess the Turks are just making it up when they openly discuss their attacks on YPG and PKK units in Syria? >"Rojava" destroyed Raqqa at the behest and with the support of NATO Right because I'm sure the SAA didn't destroy any cities in the process of retaking them from ISIS and the FSA.

>>1234584 Based lenin hat with the retarded takes

>>1234587 >abloo abloo if you sell oil through a variety of willing intermediaries ranging from USA to the Assad regime itself instead of starving to death that makes you an imperial puppet

>>1234614 >So I guess the Turks are just making it up when they openly discuss their attacks on YPG and PKK units in Syria? Just because they do that doesn't absolve them of their crimes in balkanising Syria. Zionists fought the British colonial authorities in Palestine, doesn't make them right because it plunged Palestine into another colonial regime.

>>1234337 >He should have sided with the Axis against the Anglo imperial powers <Molotov-Ribbentrop <Joint invasion of Poland <"Furthermore, do not forget that these rulers belong to a race which combines, in a rare mixture, bestial cruelty and an inconceivable gift for lying, and which today more than ever is conscious of a mission to impose its bloody oppression on the whole world. Do not forget that the international Jew who completely dominates Russia today regards Germany not as an ally, but as a state destined to the same fate." Are you a fucking glowie sent to make me hang myself?

>>1234798 <Molotov-Ribbentrop Non-aggression pact. <Joint invasion of Poland The USSR didn't invade Poland.

>>1234780 >Just because they do that doesn't absolve them of their crimes in balkanising Syria. But they aren't doing that. They've repeatedly expressed a desire to remain part of Syria. If they are intent on balkanization then why have they not declared themselves an independent state? More importantly, why would Assad work so closely with them if they constitute an existential threat to Syria's territorial integrity? If they were really a tool of NATO, why would NATO forces attack them? I think its abundantly clear that they are playing both sides to their benefit, with their ultimate goal being autonomy within Syria.

>>1234800 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Poland

>>1234800 >The USSR didn't invade Poland. Yes they did and they were 100% justified in doing so.

>>1234210 >Assad will win Rojava has an okay relationship with Assad, so it is possible for him to win and for Rojava to continue to exist

>>1234449 >tfw you are sentenced to death for serving coffee to Saddam

>>1234015 they got btfo in 2019 is all downhill from there

>>1234037 literally the only non retarded post you have ever made

>>1234015 Best case scenario is Turkey gets tired and signs a ceasefire and they make an alliance with assad But that’s never gonna happen

>>1235336 At this rate Idlib and Afrin will be annexed into the "Turkish Republic of Northern Syria"

>>1234037 Assad doesn’t really want an independent Kurdistan though, since it would encourage Kurds in Syria and Iran to join them. It’s very unlikely that an independent Kurdistan would be carved out if Turkey and nowhere else.

>>1235410 PKK doesn't want an independent Kurdistan either

>>1235417 Sounds like Syria is going to become bigger then

>>1234026 Retard

>>1234811 Wikipedia isn't a history source. >>1234815 There was no invasion, the Polish government had fled and it was Belarusian and Ukrainian land occupied by Poland in 1920. Polish soldiers were ordered to stand down.

>>1234810 By letting American soldiers into Syria, by shipping oil to USA trucks, by unilaterally declaring themselves a separate federation from the rest of Syria, by destroying cities with American artillery that's exactly what they're doing. They're de facto independent already.

Anyway, if Kurds want autonomy then they have to work with Syrian communists, not beg the USA for freedom.

>>1236517 >Syrian communists But only the ones who are Assad's rubberstamps, amirite?

>>1236494 They also allow SAA soldiers into Rojava and ship oil to the SAA. Once again they're playing both sides, likely as insurance against the other. If they were agents of the US they wouldn't be working so closely with America's enemies, and they wouldn't be directly fighting a NATO member. I think its fair to criticize them for opportunism, but that isn't the same as being a "US puppet" or whatever, since their actions clearly indicate an independent agenda which is not hostile to Syria in and of itself. >by unilaterally declaring themselves a separate federation from the rest of Syria They didn't do this. They declared autonomy, not independence. >by destroying cities with American artillery I'll ask again, do you think Assad hasn't destroyed any cities over the course of the war? Take a look at Aleppo. War brings destruction. >>1236517 >Syrian communists You mean the ones that were repressed and outlawed for decades and are only allowed to exist because they are controlled opposition?

>>1235335 I was literally just going to post this

>>1236630 They're an independent party. I can't believe people still think Assad is some evil dictator. Syria is more democratic than most countries by some distance.

>>1237289 >Syria is more democratic than most countries by some distance LOLninists, everyone.

>>1234015 Yes. They play both sides (Russia/America) and Turkey seems to have cucked out.

>>1236478 >There was no invasion, the Polish government had fled and it was Belarusian and Ukrainian land occupied by Poland in 1920. Polish soldiers were ordered to stand down. So an invasion. Just becuase the poles just rolled over and took it doesn't make it any less so.

>>1291301 They didn't roll over because there was no invasion. Much like Katyn, the idea that the USSR did it is a nazi lie.

>>1234085 >everyone including the US <Yank troops ever leaving Syria without force

>>1291753 >Entering the territory of another country without the consent of its government >Not an invasion The Soviets were absolutely right to do what they did, but it was still clearly an invasion.

>>1291753 >nazi lie Sure thing bootlicker