/gulag/ - Meta

Meta Board. Where you belong

catalog
Mode: Thread
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8192

Files

Max file size: 80.00 MB

Max files: 5

Captcha
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules


If you have questions or need answers you can contact the leftypol staff through matrix @ https://app.element.io/#/room/!RQxdjfGouwsFHwUzwL:matrix.org

(2.92 MB 291x300 1390943924882.gif)
Comrade 11/05/2020 (Thu) 21:27:58 No. 8296 [Reply] [Last]
Why does this board no longer allow dissent? When I first started posting on the old /leftypol/ on 8ch over 4 years ago I was drawn to it precisely because of its unrestricted nature. But now I get regularly hit with bans for making unpopular posts despite providing plenty of evidence for my views and always seeking to engage people rationally. Yet I get called "schizo" just for being frustrated with the world and seeking to convince others. I fear within a year or two /leftypol/ will be totally dead.
23 posts and 2 images omitted.
>>8296 >But now I get regularly hit with bans for making unpopular posts >Yet I get called "schizo" just for being frustrated with the world and seeking to convince others. Holy based.
lmao every time someone makes a complaint without clearly stating what they're getting banned for and using vague bullshit it turns out they're either a nutjob or a racist
>>8655 Sure bud, everyone you seethe about is "muh racist"
(24.85 KB 700x800 1602371277438.png)
>>8344 >midwit
>>8353 I was talking about a different leninhat poster, not the germ-theory denying retard.

(38.39 KB 796x342 leftypol ad.PNG)
Am I going to get banned here? Comrade 08/07/2019 (Wed) 02:16:17 No. 1365 [Reply] [Last]
I didn't know where to post this so I'm assuming the meta board is the place for such questions.

/pol/ refugee here. I'm going to be completely honest, I'm a Fascist. Well, Fascist in terms of 'worldview' but politically a Strasserist and here's my beef:

>Don't:
>-attempt to cloak reactionary politics in left-wing rhetoric (Strasserism, "Nazbol" Strasserism, National "Socialism," Zionism, "Die cis scum"/"Kill all white men" SJW shit)

So is the person advertising this place unaware of this? Wtf do I do? Am I not welcome and is anything I say gonna get me banned? I'll be blunt, I've been a 'National Socialist' since 2012, but I was a little 's' socialist. Over the past two years, I've become a big 'S' Socialist. I used to think SJW'ism was Marxist, but it's become very clear this is a product of liberalism and capitalism. I slowly began to see the impact of capitalism and industrialisation. I'm anti-capitalist, big unionist, worker collective anti-'porky'. Is my input allowed on this board? Are threads discussing race, race-class dynamics allowed? I have multiple threads ideas that feel more comfortable here than on /pol/ but frankly, might be better on /pol/ if only to bring others over to anti-capital ideas. Or at least to oppose 'conservatism'. I wouldn't know how to not 'cloak' my views in left-rhetoric when those are my views and I hold an economically left but socially hard right perspective.

Or should I take the hint and go elsewhere? I don't know why you'd advertise this with such an odd rule which clearly tells people like us to get lost.

Also, no offense, but this interface looks like shit, is there a way to change the colours and fonts?
46 posts and 2 images omitted.
>>8379 M8, the big problem we're having is that there are mods voting for Biden and who think that liberal idpol is A-OK. These same mods have ignored reported /pol/-posting until it complaints of said /pol/-shit is explicitly spammed in /gulag/. Meanwhile liberal idpol and sectarian baitposting is left up for days or weeks on end. Then when someone makes a post critical of liberal idpol it gets deleted because the language or terms used aren't 'PC' despite us being a politically incorrect site. Moreover, /b/ is being moderated irrationally, with porn being spoilered by mods for no reason, them deleting content for no given reason and again, ignoring posts of literal /pol/propaganda. Moderation needs to be cleaned up and to write and follow some basic ESTABLISHED rules, which I have suggested and have been utterly ignored >>>/gulag/7986 TL;DR The top of the page in /leftypol/ states "no idpol or sectarianism" yet we don't see this being done consistently or fairly. People have written some fair guides for Global rules, use them please.
(187.78 KB 420x420 chernobyl banging.gif)
This tweet is from 2019 and Coma doesn't even have a twitter anymore apparently. Therefore I'm anchoring this to avoid confusion. >>8384 The mod team is made up of a cross section of ideologies, and yes that includes some element of reformism. Mods can have their own views about the election and whatever else. I would like to point out that we haven't banned everyone who says they're voting for Trump so why should we do the reverse? As for liberal idpol, please see the manifesto, which addresses this topic (in a manner of speaking), here it is; "An important part of /leftypol/’s unique character is our opposition to identity politics. We believe that conflicts between genders, races, sexualities, and so on are distractions from the wider class struggle that are intentionally fanned by the ruling class. This does not mean that oppression based on personal characteristics does not exist, but that it should be approached from an egalitarian perspective which is not personally accusatory and does not assign ‘victim’ and ‘oppressor’ groups. The rights of individuals to live according to their own wishes is a fundamental part of leftism." We try to moderate according to that definition. Yes, we do still disagree sometimes, and no, there is no perfect definition of what is and isn't idpol. >Then when someone makes a post critical of liberal idpol it gets deleted because the language or terms used aren't 'PC' despite us being a politically incorrect site. We protect your right to say 'stupid' and similar things that Reddit doesn't like, as for 'faggot', 'nigger', etc etc, those terms are allowed only at our discretion, if we feel they contribute to a genuinely reactionary post they may well merit its deletion. Communism is politically incorrect but there is nothing inherently brave about screaming racial epithets into the wind. >Moreover, /b/ is being moderated irrationally, with porn being spoilered by mods for no reason, them deleting content for no given reason and again, ignoring posts of literal /pol/propaganda. /b/ is still experimental and we are still deciding what the rules should be. For now we have decided to spoiler porn in OPs. Other stuff is still up in the air.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

>>8414 >This tweet is from 2019 and Coma doesn't even have a twitter anymore apparently. Therefore I'm anchoring this to avoid confusion. Wtf that was why I couldn't find it? I just thought he had it "restricted" considering nobody ITT outright said that it was a fabrication. >2019 I apologize, my complaints would've been cut down by 50% probably if I was aware of this.
>>8419 It's fine, I didn't realise either.
>>8414 >nothing inherently brave about screaming racial epithets into the wind. true, but I've had large posts where 'faggot' is barely even 1% of the post and it gets deleted because a vol didn't like criticism of a liberal idpol despite me using legit sources and arguments. >For now we have decided to spoiler porn in OPs. Other stuff is still up in the air. Ok, just give people a heads up ya know, it's really disconcerting to see an effort post disappear while some pro-NATO liar is getting away with literal wikipedia copy-pasta. >We will fill out the global rules section, perhaps with your rules or an edited versio Looking forward to that, ciao

COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMERS UNITE Anonymous 10/01/2020 (Thu) 00:46:19 No. 7186 [Reply] [Last]
COOOOOMERS OF /LEFTYPOL/ FROM NOW ON, WE DECLARE OURSELVES ON STRIKE AGAINST BUNKERCHAN FOR NOT GIVING US A /NSFW/ BOARD /GET/ ISN'T ENOUGH FOR US. WHERE WILL WE GET OUR PORN, WE WANT PORN APPROVED BY THE PARTY. COOMERS OF BUNKERCHAN, UNITE FOR THE /NSFW/ BOARD THAT WILL SOLVE ALL OF OUR PROBLEMS. NO MORE GOING TO /GIF/ TO SEE NAZIS SPERG OUT. NO MORE GOING TO NORMIE PORNHUB. WE SHALL MAKE OUR OWN /NSFW/ BOARD THE /NSFW/ MUST COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOME TO BUNKERCHAN. FROM NOW ON, I SHALL MAKE A NO-FAP STRIKE UNTIL WE DON'T HAVE OUR OWN BOARD FOR OUR NECESSITIES. COOMERS, UNITE Make it real. >>>/nsfw/
26 posts and 1 image omitted.
>>>/b/ exists for all your nutting needs.
/b/ now exists so this demand is unneeded. Enjoy.
(370.12 KB 712x929 FB_IMG_15758762595917544.jpg)
(181.86 KB 712x429 FB_IMG_15717667456617401.jpg)
>>7186 Leftcels & Leftchads laughing at you.
(138.78 KB 368x607 1606238041281.png)
>>7186 Only good coomer is a dead one.

(6.14 KB 208x243 xi.jpg)
Remove/fix the PMC filter, it breaks links Comrade 11/06/2020 (Fri) 15:33:45 No. 8330 [Reply] [Last]
Aside from it just being dumb and immature for you guys to filter an actual useful term just because you happen to disagree with the theory behind it, it also breaks any link that has p.m.c in it, since, since it will just get filtered to "people of college". If you're going to have word filters, at least make sure they work properly and don't break shit. pic unrelated
We voted on the filter and I still think it's a good idea. Also, it is rare that a link would happen to have 'PMC' in it. Please use a link shortener in that case. We cannot add spaces to the filter on the current software to eliminate 'filter inside word' issues. That is why IQ is no longer filtered sadly. Answered and anchored.

(11.02 KB 234x250 cia.jpg)
Sputnik##SgNipD 06/28/2020 (Sun) 03:32:58 No. 5042 [Reply] [Last]
>call someone a nigger >get banned >call someone a kike >get banned >say slur >get banned come on you're better than that guys
5 posts omitted.
>>5046 >be mod >don't have a life >don't have a life >don't have a life >don't have a life >don't have a life >don't have a life >don't have a life >don't have a life >don't have a life >don't have a life >don't have a life >don't have a life >don't have a life >don't have a life >don't have a life

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

>>8287 Pot meet kettle.
>>5042 I'm not even getting banned for slurs, just winning arguments kek
No substantive criticism, anchored.
>>5042 >call someone a nigger >get banned >call someone a kike >get banned >say slur >get banned this never happened.

(231.90 KB 1400x1400 kershaw.jpg)
Comrade 11/04/2020 (Wed) 06:52:27 No. 8238 [Reply] [Last]
Wild idea: Send all /co/-related threads on /hobby/ to /GET/.
Why?
Wild idea: send all threads made on /leftypol/ that could easily go on a side board there, close the original and add a "This thread was moved to >>>/*/#####" message. No idea if the software supports it, though.
>>8250 I believe that /GET/ can easily be converted into a /co/-style board considering its roots, plus everyone there is gay and reeks of Tumblr.
>>8294 >/GET/ can easily be converted into a /co/-style board No it can't they're firmly into doing nothing but ERP, shitposting and generally being /b/ on crack and liberalism. >>8238 Fuck off faggot, leave the sideboards alone you cunt.
answered, anchored

(43.13 KB 392x457 iso_8601.png)
Switch the time format to ISO Comrade 08/22/2020 (Sat) 05:04:08 No. 6559 [Reply] [Last]
gringo MM/DD/YYYY idiocy is breaking my brain thank you
5 posts omitted.
>>6587 Screenshots do.
(175.44 KB 938x844 1496589294289.jpg)
>>6598 As a snowuigghur I have used YYYY-MM-DD in school papers as far back as CY-10. This doesn't trigger me at all.
>>6598 >DD/MM/YYYY confuse gringos How about this: 2020oct24
(586.44 KB 1265x5732 _k_ is for _k_ommando.jpg)
(58.36 KB 750x600 03_02_10.jpg)
(218.55 KB 800x649 3get.jpg)
retvrn to tradition
ISO-8601 is based

(1.89 MB 399x265 marx.gif)
threads with quality discussion deleted outright instead of anchor or move to /b/ Comrade 11/03/2020 (Tue) 08:25:00 No. 8227 [Reply] [Last]
First the "leftypol aversion to idpol" thread on /leftypol/ got deleted outright then the "White woman question" thread on /b/ got deleted outright. Why did you not just move the former to /b/ or anchor and why not anchor the latter? Y delet? There were good convos and I had points to elaborate upon. Thanks in advance!
I had my threads deleted "by accident" several times. People having discussions then it goes away, you complain in the thread, a mod comes in >that was by accident, just start a new thread <anons no longer interested in restarting a discussion in which all that was written is gone This is why threads that I'm interested in I save through the browsers. You can't rely on the moderation of this site. If they were responsible adults they wouldn't be spending their life on the internet, modding chans.

(374.51 KB 969x459 20200905_135322.png)
Genuine criticism (take it or leave) Namefag 09/05/2020 (Sat) 20:10:23 No. 6858 [Reply] [Last]
This pol has become even worse than Reddit, and I say this as someone who previously enjoyed it and spent a great deal of time here anonymously. The quality of people, and not only posts, has sunk rock bottom. I judge this first off from their reactions to things. I (and friends who evacuated, lol) ask simple questions, not all of them entirely related to politics, maybe I have some random image, and I get fucktards either hyperfixiating on the image or becoming paranoid and aggressive, or repeating the same mantra ten timed in a row, "A thread died for this", "a thread died for this". Or during a conversation everyone is calling each other schizo/mentally handicapped (as if that's an insult), but in the same vein those doing it will say the other side is racist or fascist. Hypocrisy is a general rule on this site. Now what makes it worse than Reddit? Midwits. Reddit at least has enough members that the normie dimwit tier memesters outnumber the mediocre, average IQ jerks with a superiority complex. But here, basically everyone is a genuine midwit Lefty style social morality plays big time into what is deemed acceptable. They ask for sources but the moment I give 12 sources for an unacceptable position not widely accepted in mainstream circles, my post gets deleted. I have to download a VPN to post it at all. They are utterly convinced that their position is right, everything is a spook but somehow they are on the "good side" and I am a pseud or schizo, they are not. Point out the fuckery of these people and they'll flail their hands, assume you are part of X group, and point fingers at the other side ("your side does it too"), never admitting when they are in the wrong and changing it At least idiots will shut the fuck up and be humble, or accept that an alternative view is at least reasonable. But the worst part of it is, they are mediocre in the truest sense. No action, no lateral thinking, not even visual intelligence (judging from the answers they give to my prodding), nothing. Just sucking dick while claiming not to suck dick and being a massive hypocrite. I don't want to stirr up anything so I won't give examples, but this why I and 50 others have all but stopped talking here. We moved on. I come back and it's even worse than before. The mods themselves are like this
111 posts and 9 images omitted.
(70.38 KB 1292x464 1.PNG)
(131.81 KB 792x380 2.PNG)
(42.76 KB 1529x452 pol.PNG)
Reminder: OP is a schizo trying to carry out some kind of personal vendetta against /leftypol/ because jannies were meanies who didn't allow him to shitpost the board or something. He's not even from here, he's a /pol/yp who's been ban evading and you can track down the shit he's posted on /pol/. He's whining about censorship but he's actually just a /pol/yp trying to shill his shit, now he's shilling on /b/
>>8110 Wait.... how did you track him down?
>>8110 >>8130 He's from pol and he's screenshotting his own posts to stir up drama.
>>8110 >>8212 We don't know or care about this personal drama
(40.89 KB 680x672 tweakerchad.jpg)
You know just parsing through the content of the OP it's obvious your the whiny cunt that's been posting like at least 40% of the garbage on bunkerchan. Your wrong, your "criticism" is retarded and wrong, and just because you possess an ego doesn't make you automatically correct. You whine about midwits however clearly you can only look up to them. Please feel some shame for once loser. shit like >I (and friends who evacuated, lol) is just pathetic bottom of the barrel slop that you use to try and hide your lack of any real merit or dare I say arguments. Actually once I got to here: >I don't want to stirr up anything so I won't give examples, but this why I and 50 others have all but stopped talking here. It's clear you have some kind of mental illness or personality disorder that causes you to lie excessively and believe yourself much more important than you actually are. I see absolutely no value in you as a human being from anything that you've posted on this overall high quality forum. That's not to say I believe you especially and egregiously terrible in any remarkable or interesting way. On the contrary I am sure you have many mediocre qualities that round you out to be just one more obnoxious asshole spending his days pathetically tugging on his limp cock and proclaiming himself the misunderstood and chad genius with a very remarkable and unique brain. You have nothing unique about you or I'm sure you would have beaten the dead horse long past any initial socially awkward interjection you could squeeze it into to try and validate your own narcissism. There is nothing interesting about you anon, and even if there were no one would fucking care or remember longer than it takes for the thread to scroll down. >>8110 pol is so delusional and retarded that they inoculate us against astroturfing

Give us the SSNP flag Comrade 08/12/2020 (Wed) 17:00:59 No. 6309 [Reply] [Last]
Give us the SSNP flag
18 posts and 5 images omitted.
>>6342 It was a test, fag. It shows how shitty the implementation is if spoilers can only work on a single line. [code] This is also a test but I bet you'll be too stupid to see [/code]
SSNP are literally socdems >pro-capitalism >pro strong social security, education and welfare >anti-communism The thing they have going for them is that they're secular, but other than that, they're not revolutionary.
>>6436 Well we do have a socdem flag
Mods pull through
>>6323 >I just got this book on the SSNP Interesting! I didn't know there is a book in english about this weird movement. I will check it out!

Delete
Report

no cookies?