>>5269 Oh no. Where did you post this, anon.

take the GNUpill, lad.

Post this on the leftypol subreddit

>>5677 who

This is already policy and they all voted on it and now they don’t follow it

>>5632 That idpol rule is bullshit

>>5727 We do follow it.

>>5727 >>5728 Rigged results. Idpol is cancer.

Would be cool if you added pic

>>4252 It’s on /ref/ if you want to check it out.

>>4263 Yeah I know, still think that it should be added to leftypol

>>2373 This >>2370 I'd also like it if they added new flags. For example ordinary country ones to see your location. I know some will counter it with >muh feds data mining but not everyone gives a shit about that.

If this flag would be added, I would consider becoming namefag (so aproach this submission with caution)

>>5409 The thread is dying anyways.

Can you ban >>>/hobby/12399, this faggot is derailing the thread AGAIN by posting bai about "muh gun control" Why? A) The argument on gun control has happened and is over, but this same anon keeps posting the same "muh gun control retard" while saging just to bait a reply B) Thread OP specifically didn't want gun control discussion, and shitposts like that are just fucking derailing the thread and thus against site rules So just do us a favor and delete it so that some anon doesn't happen to reply and continue the pointless shitshow and people can continue to talk about guns and not politics.

>>5435 Rodent ignore

>>5436 No

>>5435 Good job you got ALL the gun control posts deleted... except a few which now seem completely out of place because they're not replying to anything at all

Agree, now post on /ref/

>>5464 People who do the following things Lenin talked about: >Bernstein has surrounded this political demand with a whole battery of well-attuned “new” arguments and reasonings. Denied was the possibility of putting socialism on a scientific basis and of demonstrating its necessity and inevitability from the point of view of the materialist conception of history. Denied was the fact of growing impoverishment, the process of proletarisation, and the intensification of capitalist contradictions; the very concept, “ultimate aim”, was declared to be unsound, and the idea of the dictatorship of the proletariat was completely rejected. Denied was the antithesis in principle between liberalism and socialism. Denied was the theory of the class struggle, on the alleged grounds that it could not be applied to a strictly democratic society governed according to the will of the majority, etc.

>>5497 Radlib spotted. Just because Uncle Joe makes your panties twist doesn't mean shit. >>5496 I know this is probably mean to be satire, but honestly that's unironically what radlibs believe. >>5476 >Cult like deference Deference to whom or what you brainlet? >pedo 8chan 1) outdated as fuck 2) leftypol has always been anti-pedo, and pedo/lolicon shills are banned to /GET/ and /ded/ Radlibs are easy to spot given that they A) can't stop bitching about Muh conservatives B) thinks that debunking myths about the American South or modern feminism is reactionary C) thinks that "uthority is evul" and insult Castro & the USSR as horrible

>>5474 >nature, biology, mental health Because those are not tied directly to politics... regardless those threads more often than not belong on >>>/hobby/ >>5475 A lot recently. The Russian thread had some guy shitting themselves over a Russian leftist movie reviewer because they have VK posts detailing a debunk of myths on General Lee and the American South, that points out the hypocrisy and embellishments of liberal shit-talking.

>>5460 Why would radlibs ban radlibs?

>>5348 it does not date back to the earliest days of the board. bunkerchan maybe /leftypol/ no. That was only brought in post old BO fit

Being a jannie is idpol

>Everything I don't like is a /pol/ trolling Shut the fuck up and grow up janny.

>>5387 Correct

>>5288 This board is run by radlibs. We need a new place to migr8 to

>>5364 I think spoilering is just a courtesy for all boards on the site. After all even /GET/ censors any overt genitalia.

Yeah, it's mostly just courtesy and some of us have jobs.

>>5278 >/leftypol/ is a non-sectarian left imageboard. if you feel like your special leftist ideology is under attack, learn to defend it better and persuade the tankies you're correct Acting as if /leftypol/ has ever been "non-sectarian" is some of the most retarded newfaggotry that persists here. That epithet is a running joke and has never stopped both anons and jannies from engaging in some of the most virulent sectarianism imaginable. Even reddit has less sectarianism. I personally don't have a problem with sectarian struggle, but I find this big lie about antisectarianism on bunkerchan to be among the most corrosive and insidious covers for authoritarian sectarianism imaginable. The only reason why you even think you can say that without a hint of irony is because you benefit from this bullshit and your right-wing ideology is privileged through it. If you aren't even doing so consciously, then you truly are owned by the idealism that was instructed within you. No amount of robust criticism will persuade right-wingers like tankies. You are assuming those scum are intellectually honest or capable of independent thought, which has no basis in reality whatsoever. Their own ideology explicitly encourages as much! Suggesting that those of us who criticize their incessant reactionary crap do so and merely bare through the impenetrable bigotry and deafening cacaphony of victimization and political correctness is just a restatement of the status quo. I already know you aren't a leftist, but I didn't take you to be so wed to the present conditions. >sectarian struggles are retarded though, we should all ride with whatever communist group that is more likely/able to gain real power. And if you think this generic affirmation won't necessarily be coded in ideological terms by tankies to mean basically only ML parties, then you're a fucking idiot who carries their water for free.

>>5278 This one hundred percent: >>5280

>>5280 >tfw

>>2231 this board supports theory and actually existing socialism and strongly opposes liberalism read engles

>>2233 you are aware the free territory was a bureaucratic bourgeois system that caused future famines to happen, not to mention it was capitalist as fuck

>>5024 <ban people for having opinions I don't like If their opinions are bad, make yourself useful and argue a counterposition in the thread. Don't just go whining to the jannies like a retarded child because your delicate fee-fees got hurt.

>>5326 it’s not about fee-fees dumbass teenager. it’s about having a sincere conversation without dealing with tactical nihilists spamming with their edgy “arguments”

>>5193 How is this fucking glowposting? It's absolutely correct. Libya was never socialist despite its social welfare and certain socialist tendencies.

>>5202 >gaddagi bad because socdem Well that's the poster's problem, not the OP

Cope, seethe, dilate and have sex, faggot.

i dunno