What is the point of overboard SFW if /GET/ is still listen on it? We already enforce spoilering NSFW images on every board? ???

Technical ways to facilitate --> >>>/leftypol/474770 ?

can the boards get shorter folder names when we move to gochan

>>4811 What do you mean?

Show ban length and staff name under ban message

>>4774 Mod Vote : Should /a/ be the next /roulette/ trial board? Vote ends 20:30 07/05/2020 UTC. For : 5 Against : 0 Abstention : 0 Approved

I'm starting to think that liberals are starting to infect /leftypol/ and become the ban-happy mods. If the mods are not the liberals themselves, they cave into the demands of the liberals. Eg. >Liberal: "ahh that guy discussed arranged marriages! HEZ AN INC*L" >Mod: "oh fuck" *swings ban hammer* I do understand the mods' intention to stop the inc*l menace, but now, they seem to believe any word from liberals. Moderators are a reactionary concept anyway.

>>4853 For : 4 Against : 0 Abstention : 0 Approved

>>2057 i don't have money lol take my bump

commies don't have monies

>>4559 some do

>>4757 ban this man or charge his ip 25 albums

NEVER

>>4815 We have to wait for Space to push through the changes, apologies for the inconvenience.

Games aren't real. Drop your pants

It's there in the Bunkerchan Frontend, it just takes a million years to update for some reason.

Can I report a bug? /games/ shows up on the top bar when you're in the catalog or board index, but when you're in a thread it disappears (the exception being the thread is on /games/)

>>4809 I posted this in the /leftypol/ moderator thread but I had a feeling someone might be mentioning it in /gulag/ too so I came over here. I just wanted to give an example of how many random idpol, troll, Sakai and anti-Sakai threads we have up at any given time. I think one thread for this topic would be fine, but this is a lot of bullshit to be dealing with.

More focus on moderating the threads and less on people's takes on shit would be better. Lots of low effort threads tend to be made, it kills too much of the other stuff.

test

>>4868 You are the gore spammer, right? Or was that some other cunt, I already forgot.

>>4868 ><you have been banned for 7 days for concern trolling if you're gonna false flag at least make sure people can't just check the logs you moron

>>4868 Get is separate from the rest of the board. No point in using it unless you are an ERPing tranny.

>>4858 Part Jesus, look at all the words >Eternal growth is only demanded by the current govt+corp+finance complex. When capital does not grow capital does not exist. That is what happens when a depression occurs. There ceases to be a sufficient expectation of a return on investments, so investors stop investing. Investment resumes in increments as the weaker porkies get culled. Then the cycle begins again. A stoppage of growth is just a depression. >Why insist on reifying the current mode as some holy eternal law.It isnt. Things have properties. Growth is a definitive property of capital. M becomes M'. Third-positionists want to have social production without capital, but the engine that moves social production is capital. That does not have to be the case, but when capital is removed from the formula something has to takes its place. Investors do not invest without expectation of a return. What makes investors invest if doing so does not benefit them? My solution: have no investors at all and produce for use. >Their analysis is sound and sometimes accurate - but their models still assume gold backed ie limited currency What have they gotten right? I cannot help remembering Greenspan being completely befuddled when the bubbles burst. >Soviet's best mathematicians couldnt figure it out. Where does this myth come from? Kantrovich did it in 1939. >Give me a synopsis of cockshot. Cockshott cited Kantrovich's arithmetical method based on production outputs and combined it with Dantzig's simplex method to scale it up infinitely. It is all based upon the point that money is not the only scaling objective function out there. I will include the pamphlet in case you are interested. I am not an advocate of central planning, being a leftcom, but Cockshott makes a convincing case for its plausability. >Give my regards to the lady of the manor squire. I'm hitting the sack.Drunk as a lord. Til the morrow May your headache be light and your bedroom dark. >Appreciate the chance for sincere debate like civilised grown ups. It is both pleasant and unusual to talk with someone here about economics and not have it turn into a memefest two posts in. God, the MLs can cite Lenin back and forth, but once the subject turns to the M-C-M' cycle in Capital and its relation to the state it's all "anarkiddy" and "imperialist."

>>4857 >Remember that the state is a construct, not a thinking, acting entity So is capital.The rules you ascribe to it are a construct too and pur ideology.Capital to marxists is some type of gnostic demiurge with dialectical materialism providing the role of the saviour logos acting throughout history. The state is power over a defined geographical region and population.The question is who/what controls that power.Currently it is management elites who are largely under the thumb of extant capitalism. The question is how to get the right elite in power,preferably in several core western states at the same time ,to challenge global capital and knock it down a peg or 200. >the bureaucrats still had to extract surplus-value from workers This fixation on extraction of surplus value as inherently exploitative clouds all your thinking. Qualitative distinctions matter. >They were still beholden to capital and its inherent contradictions Capital? in what sense? Extraction of surplus value? No contradiction there outside the current capitalist system. >liberals of the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century They did so to protect capitalism as we know it - not to castrate it and domesticate it as is my intent.They did nothing else which is required. >How does one provide increasingly large quantities of start-up capital to such inefficient entities with any hope of recouperation Currently SMEs are 80% of the uk economy.No special govt funding is even required.What is required is the evisceration of big porkies ie breaking up monopolies,transnationals and eliminating parasitical privateer finaniers by aforementioned nationalisation of the financial industries - on a pan-national level. >first economic downturn There will be no further downturns after pan-national autarkic control of finance.The "business cycle" is a product of the current govt-corp-finance complex aka extant capitalism - which is an arbitrary construct >This sounds a lot like the British and American economic system of the early-eighteenth century when the factory system was still young. The american system yes.Some similarities.That was back when americans were still wise to the banking oligarchies and their games.

>>4861 >Youre too* smart to delude yourself otherwise. >"Capital" of itself is sterile unless propped up by* state enforced usury and fiat

>>4859 Lets expand this debate beyond just you stating marxist ideology and me disagreeing. It will get circular and dull. Let's bring in some other issues eg social issues,humanbiodiversity,the "women issue",woke capital - the radlib faggotry spewed forth by the current liberal superstructure etc

>>4859 You still alive comrade?

>>4841 >but mostly just addressing human biology and contemporary genetic/biological research from the lens of dialectical materialism*.

I'll basically name the thread human biology, start with a paragraph of non-controversial foundations that are quite important but often missed(?), like pointing out that homo sapiens-sapiens is a subspecies, and that "race" isn't a contemporary biological category at all. Then I will address some of the other topics mentioned in the OP in-thread, so as to not bump a OP with any trace of uncertainty or arguable points; letting it only contain basics of human biology and leaving the potential debates for the reply-chains. I invite mods to be heavy-handed if /pol/ or IDpol thinks they're welcome while the replies are going, as I want this to develop dialectically forward into a heightened biological understanding for bunkerchan and not make another "IDpol containment thread".

Please give it a chance.

>>4844 Sure, personally I feel like it would be better on /edu/.

>>4854 Yeah, I agree. I think /edu/ is the better choice.

>>4804 Ya we only just got it working, sorry man. I would like to archive more/all threads but I've been told that it would require unrealistic amounts of server spaces/memory etc

>>4807 >I would like to archive more/all threads but I've been told that it would require unrealistic amounts of server spaces/memory etc Yeah, text is a real resource hog.

>>4812 Many threads would lose all context without the media included though.

>>4818 Not really.

>>4831 Well that's just like your opinion man. I mean, I'm not part of the tech team, I suggested archiving everything and was told it was unfeasible/not worth it.

>>4738 Reminder that the forces of Idpol will claim the base of leftypol is either reactionary or liberal deppending on the situation to push their agenda of identity politics

>>4738 >muh malthusianism Fuck off pseud

Hey I got permanently banned from literally all of Bunkerchan because I had a single mental breakdown on /GET/ and just think that’s extremely excessive, I use the website all the time and think a vol racistly conflated me with the Sakai troll because I’m black, in reality I have severe BPD and put out decent threads in /leftypol/ and don’t see how it’s fair to be banned from every board because of how I acted in a single board once

>>4787 >sadist black male Based, welcome to the banned Nazbol gang now. Looks like you had bad beef with your exes and they've permanently mentally scarred you. Your looking for a lover that won't treat like shit while trying to force her to unrequitally love you so you don't have to go through another one of those breakups yet again and if you do it will be on your terms. The fact that it's a white girl most likely means that you like white women and not any of this "misogyny" bullshit those FA/GET/S are trying to claim. Most likely you can't carry out your revenge on your exes through legal or extralegal means safely so this is your mind telling you a alternative way. Apart from that you might need some type of counselor because I don't think anyone could be in such a abusive relationship for so long before leaving you and you'll be on a tightrope of the women claiming domestic abuse. I believe your goal is to make certain that the object of your love won't leave you and abuse you and it is important to take advice from other like minded people on who to go forward to acquire that goal. Maybe look up some sadist forums on how they get full control of their M's and not in the bed but in all aspects of social life.

What was the point of the software update to be able to move threads when the mods don't even use it? Move >>197398 to >>>/hobby/ or /a/ Move the country/region-specific cyclicals to >>>/ref/ Move tech threads to >>>/tech/ Move lit threads to >>>/edu/ There's no reason for /leftypol/ to be so clogged. Every time shitpost threads gets anchored it drags quality threads with them by inertia and anons not usually keeping track of ~5-7 pages of /leftypol/ at once (for good reason). This means effort threads continuously die prematurely for a problem that has apparently been solvable for some time now (mods able to move threads yet not doing it). Please attend to it.