Any person of intelligence should never give people like you any quarter, because you give lolicon defenders an inch and they take a mile and soon it's "what's so wrong with CP anyway" bullshit, every fucking time.
>Muh thought crimes
Typical western idiocy. Lolicon is not just 'thoughts, it is thoughts that are put onto paper/screens and spread to other people. It is not isolated to yourself and does influence other people and not in a good way.
>You can't really be judged for what's inside your head
<You're the next Chikotlo who just has been repressing themselves because social norms? Don't worry no judging! Don't get help, just 'be yourself' even when it's retarded because that't what 50 years of capitalist propaganda told you.
>Anyone who says otherwise
<People who say lolicon is bad are dogmatists
<I'm totally not dogmatizing 'muh freedoms' when I refuse to accept legitimate criticism
<Imma just ignore the fact that social, economic and political environment influences people and their behaviors.
Nobody says that "if you look at a loli you turn into a pedo". The point is that relatively frequent exposure to such things and what they represent influence people. The very concept of Memes proves cultivation theory, since without it, memes would just be captioned images and wouldn't become hot-topics or spread across the internet.
>want to look better in the eyes of society
<ur a white knight if you think about ethics
You sound like an Ancap incel. It's hilarious to claim this when American society and even European society is so obsessed with "liburty!!!!"
>anti-degeneracy is 'muh boomers' and 'moralfags'
<Hurr anyone who thinks being a hedonist is retarded is 'my parental issues'
>a cargo cult of late 2000's pedohysteria
LOL ok Epstein, all the CP rings and child abuse that keeps getting found 'totally' isn't real.
>they can't catch an actual child molester
Because they're online, and to catch them you'd have to engage with them and risk being accused of being one instead
>they start attacking harmless artists/audiences
<social influence is totally harmless, REALLY!!!
The point was never about "hurting" fictional characters but about how the people who view and "enjoy" such content are essentially escaping into a paedo fantasy and normalizing child sexualization.
Many of these 'artists' often model off REAL children when drawing these hentai doujins.
>virtue signalling radlibs
<radlibs are literally promoting child sexuality and MAPS pride
LOL you're just using leftypol buzzwords to sound smarter
>sexual fantasy should be prohibited
<fantasizing about a bigheaded kid fucking someone is totally legit because it's not real!!!
It's one thing to have some minor fetishes. Foodplay or or foot-fagging or spanking etc. But enjoying shit, literal and figurative is just mentally ill. It's fairly well recognized on leftypol that sexual obsession is a caused by capitalist consumerism, dehumanization and objectification (and more). Sex is so oversaturated and commodified in society that people crave shit that they wouldn't even think of. Horny people will jerk off to anything and only after will they realize that "oh, I just fapped to a picture of a dog fucking an anime girl" or some other shit.
>An edited and clearly glamorized depiction is the same as the actual thing.
<It totally isn't a prettified bersion of what is essentially abuse
I agree that the age of consent being 18 is excessive, however it exists because until the ages of 16-18 your mind isn't yet fully developed and cannot reliably make smart adult decisions (like consent), partly due to late-stage pubertal hormones. It's why you see teen girls going insane for generic pop singers like Justin Bieber and later look back on it with embarrassment.