/GET/ - Hangout

"It's Game Time!"

catalog
Mode: Reply
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8192

Files

Max file size: 80.00 MB

Max files: 5

Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules


Welcome to /GET/, a congregation of everything that's wrong with humanity.

(242.94 KB 1812x2048 benegotherit.jpg)
Simp 3.0 Anonymous Comrade 10/21/2020 (Wed) 21:10:55 No. 120093
Last thread got bumblocked, we must continue our work: LETS SIMP
>>120093 Right lads, dumping some AWOOOOOGA's of everyone's favorite redhead again. Grab them dicks
(220.98 KB 669x910 IMG_5949.JPG)
I loved that 90s girl aesthetic, simple but yes plz
>>120121 >>120123 >>120122 >Clean shaven >No big red bush Absolutely disgusting
(252.68 KB 1536x2048 Ashbcoffin.jpg)
>>120120 >>120121 >>120122 >>120123 Doesn't look at all like the same person as pic rel. The facial structure is totally different. How am I the only one who has noticed this btw?
(3.62 MB 676x1280 hottestvideoontheinternet.mp4)
instant boner this is on my tl
(209.95 KB 1638x2048 EUzYCwUXkAYfxlg.jpeg)
(14.07 MB 1280x720 lingerie-1_1.mp4)
Whiptrax
>>120180 Jesus Christ
>>120149 She had face surgery
Literally the most perfect set of tits on any current human 3d female.
(3.41 KB 236x213 baseddepartment.jpeg)
>>120170 damn thats hot
(52.89 KB 750x722 clancy siip.jpg)
>>120281 What am I looking at?
>>120281 Wow this is great. Source?
>>120281 what is her @
>>120170 Damn. Is there a longer version of that video, or more of those girls?
(384.90 KB 1676x2048 ElDFlolXgAATmLS.jpeg)
(475.14 KB 1536x2048 ElDFi0vX0AIlRg8.jpeg)
FINDOM EARLE
>>120466 >She does the same ho shit she was complaining about Oh wow would you look at that 👀👌🏽
>>120470 >>120472 She's got the most beautiful slate-green eyes.
*Jaw drops to table with tongue rolling out like a carpet, gasping angry typingtically* VA-VA-VA-VOOM! *Jumps into the air horizontally, straight as a rod, hovering while wolf-whistling obnoxiously loud* WHEE-WHEEOO! *Starts flying through the air like an aeroplane making pretend machinegun noises before crashing down into the seat* NYYYEEEARRRRR, BOOSH! *Frantically taps foot against the floor while slamming fists repeatedly on the table, rattling any plates, bowls, or silverware* HELLOOOO, NURSE! *Heart starts beating so hard it visibly thumps an entire meter out of chest through the shirt in the stereotypical shape of the playing cards suit* BA-BUM, BA-BUM! *Head transforms into a cartoon anthropomorphic wolf's head, howling loudly at the moon on all fours* HAROOOOOO! *Scalp hinges back for fireworks to pop out, panting loudly as tongue hangs out of mouth while breaking chair into pieces* HOMINA HOMINA HOMINA! *Pulls out a large wooden mallet and bashes self over the head until tweety birds start circling around, and plays finger harp with slack lips* ABLBLBLLBLBLBLLBLBLLBL! *Eyes pop out of sockets and engorge into the size and shape of artillery shells accompanied by trumpets* BOI-OI-OINGGGG! *Turns a crank that activates a Rube Goldberg machine simulated audience of lecherous men applauding, whistling, and banging their fists* HUBBA HUBBA! *Pulls chain on train whistle that has spontaneously appeared next to head causing steam to blow out* CHUGGA CHUGGA CHOO CHOO! *Red mercury fills up visage like a thermometer's temperature rising causing the head to swell to three times its normal size* AWOOGA! *Wipes comically large bead of sweat from forehead with handkerchief, straightens up tie, combs hair, waxes pencil moustache* COME WITH ME TO THE KASBAH! *Tiny Cupid shoots an arrow through heart before standing up ramrod straight and falling back dead with a bouquet of flowers that has suddenly appeared in clasped hands* DOOON'T YOU BELIEVE IT!
>>120552 I fucking love this stupid ass meme
>>120281 Watching this while listening to king zard is fucking trip man
>>120827 you better have been jacking it as well
>>120281 Way too fucking big, and not even a pussy shot. What a turn off.
>>120987 Lmao imagine jerking off to a pussy, disgusting. Real Chads cum to face and titddies
(37.52 KB 500x280 242457feff3610a.jpg)
>>120990 >Chads
(1.77 MB 720x1446 who is this.mp4)
>>120987 >Way too fucking big wrong
>>120990 Well, my ranking is: 1) Pussy 2) Face 3) General body shape 4) Tits, but only if more than a plank but less than above average, in which case they drop to a turn off
(218.88 KB 579x961 grenztruppen.jpg)
>>120987 >Way too fucking big Your work is enlightenment, Names remain secret. Your actions are inconspicuous, The enemy always within field of view. Conversation with comrades much too rarely at home, For wearing the medals Often there is no time left. Be watchful, always — Be watchful! And no calmness in the heart — Be watchful! Even in peaceful time — Be watchful! — never spared. Chekists, defenders of the people's peace, Soldiers of the invisible front. Even when laughing and being happy, The yearning remains very big Towards the loved ones at home — maybe a boy. Really too often was the farewell Much too fast, almost without words. Now you hum in your dreams The songs that you used to sing often. Be watchful, always — Be watchful! And no calmness in the heart — Be watchful! Even in peaceful time — Be watchful! — never spared. Chekists, defenders of the people's peace, Soldiers of the invisible front. Each of these soldiers Fights alone on a sector of the front And yet, every single one learns To recognize the strength of many. In the pages of the book of glory Will be the names Of all the brave that we don't, Today don't yet mention. Be watchful, always — Be watchful! And no calmness in the heart — Be watchful! Even in peaceful time — Be watchful! — never spared. Chekists, defenders of the people's peace, Soldiers of the invisible front. These people are soldiers, Each is worthy of glory. Until the time, their names Are strictly kept in secret. They have proven many times That one in the field is a warrior1, They have proven many times — There are no obstacles for the brave! In every moment — watchful! In every step — watchful! Even in peaceful days Everlasting battle. Chekists — soldiers of the invisible front, Ready for any exploit. o7
(54.35 KB 750x533 1591372486804.jpg)
Is it wrong this doesn't turn me on any longer? I am not asexual, but honestly the only joy I have to all things sexual seems to reside only in knowing how passionately I can seduce anyone. Besides that sexual urges (don't worry fellow hommies, I literally wank instead of bang 99% of the time) feels like thirst. I don't do it because I enjoy it, but because it's a nuisance.
>>121017 I've never been turned on by a pussy, even get disgusted by it whenever it is pushed in my face. I also skip the pussy fingering scenes in porn. Usually I just fap to nice faces, boobs or ass play. Is this normal lol?
>>121198 Don't worry bro, I always skip oral (dick), anal and titjob. People just have different turn-ons.
>>121198 u ghey
>>121318 I don't think so. I get really turned on by female attributes like face, tits, and ass, but pussy never did it for me. Men don't really make me horny lol
>>121198 I like looking at pussies. I like looking at clits and urethras and big pudgy cameltoes. Might be gay actually
(421.29 KB 1536x2048 ElsHifiWkAIvjPY.jpeg)
MOAR FINDOM EARLE
>>121722 This is giving me second-hand embarrassment
(102.07 KB 809x1039 findomearle.jpeg)
(73.67 KB 604x462 findomearle5.jpeg)
>>121722 she has bpd
>>121751 "Cool".
>>121751 she's annoying and you're projecting
Alexis Isabelle shes an idpoler believes in saksi's shit
(56.75 KB 1081x767 june red sweater.jpeg)
(304.25 KB 581x322 D9Ze6EyXsAAPYyX.png)
SHOE
>>122070 >"""""tradcon"""" >Shows cleavage >Skirts are short >Shows midriff >Doesn't fucking exercise in order to get rid of her horrendously fat ass >Undoubtedly has an instagram and social media accounts to post pics of herself like the whore she is how about no. Elizabeth Bruenig is 100x more tradcon and she's not even trying.
(149.03 KB 1080x720 BoobaDubs.jpg)
(185.27 KB 1080x720 AssUp.jpg)
Simp for me Anon :3
>>122335 Time to go again
>>122335 Heres more stuff they posted before
>>120093 Sauce? Who this?
(653.52 KB 2880x1920 2102478876.jpg)
Fellow Simps, IDK who needs to hear this, but remember to be careful to who's OF y'all pay for Looking at the replies to this thread https://mobile.twitter.com/annaasane/status/1322289933613228032 , seems like a lot of the top 1% of OF Sex Workers are fucking kulaks and don't deserve your money Pic Unrelated
>>122335 I am trying to do nofapvember....
>>122335 Hot Rate 19/17 Would fap to again
(327.99 KB 1536x2048 IMG_20201106_014120.jpg)
(445.23 KB 1620x2047 IMG_20200902_103445.jpg)
(236.12 KB 1229x2048 IMG_20200828_161535.jpg)
>>122430 nofap is nonsense reactionary shit anyway
>>122532 I don't think you know what reactionary means, dude
>>122535 it's literally proud boy shit though? It's one of their core beliefs not to mention based on a misunderstanding scientific studies and an obsession with masculinity that often overlaps with MRA types
Anyone got any good AOC photoshops?
>>122552 Proud boys breathe too. Not sufficient. You are correct but this doesn't mean holding yourself to the most basic discipline as a leftist is bad inherently. It depends on the reasons why one should do nofap. In an ideal world why should any revolutionary waste time masturbating?
>>122532 >t. failed nnn on day 1
>>122592 >but this doesn't mean holding yourself to the most basic discipline as a leftist is bad inherently Nofap is not "basic discipline" it's a holdover from long discredited 19th century psychiatric theories about "masturbatory insanity" and barbaric practices like forcing boys to wear a spiked cage around their PENIS at night to stop them from masturbating or even having wet dreams by stabbing their PENIS with those spikes whenever it got engorged with blood (aka hard or aroused). >In an ideal world why should any revolutionary waste time masturbating? <In an ideal world why should any revolutionary waste time reading manga/listening to music/watching anime or movies/smoking a J or drinking some wine/etc etc
>>122069 Based That means JBW does not apply to her
>>122697 >This level of seethe >Not simping all day and being addicted to porn is literally the same as forcing me to wear spiked cock cages! Yeah sure dude >“The less you eat, drink and read books; the less you go to the theatre, the dance hall, the public house; the less you think, love, theorize, sing, paint, fence, etc., the more you save-the greater becomes your treasure which neither moths nor dust will devour-your capital. The less you are, the more you have; the less you express your own life, the greater is your alienated life-the greater is the store of your estranged being.” - Marx Enjoying yourself isn't bad, being addicted to masturbation is
>>122702 Whats JBW? Also here have some more of Alexis the liberal twitter.com/lexi4prez instagram.com/lexi4prez
>>122704 >This level of seethe >Not simping all day and being addicted to porn Lol wut. I wack it for like 10 minutes and bust, it's not a time-intensive thing. >Enjoying yourself isn't bad, being addicted to masturbation is That’s not what addiction is or how addiction works. The American Medical Association and the American Psychological Association both say there is no such thing as porn, sex, or masturbation addiction. The “chemicals” you’re talking about are signaling chemicals. They’re released any time you experience any pleasant thing: having sex, petting a cat, eating sushi, listening to music. These exact same chemicals are also released whenever you move; in addition to reward circuit signaling, they’re also used for voluntary motor control signaling. They’re released in small spurts and then removed within milliseconds after being released. Your brain is not a storage tank that “fills up” with these chemicals. https://www.healthline.com/health-news/researchers-say-porn-addiction-not-real-022214
>>122747 >Porn addiction isn't real I know this word gets thrown around a lot, but holy shit what an insane amount of cope. Learn to be the master of your desires and not a slave >muh article that proves my point Oh and I suppose the internet isn't addictive, and neither is food... If you're not addicted, go spend a month without looking at any porn or masturbating then
>>122735 I love these kinda thick girls, they're mad hot
>>122769 >I know this word gets thrown around a lot, but holy shit what an insane amount of cope. Learn to be the master of your desires and not a slave <Wacking it for 10 minutes out of a 24 hour day makes you a "slave to desires" Lol. >muh article that proves my point Yes. I'll trust actual doctors and medical/clinical professionals over some random anon going "Source: dude trust me". >Oh and I suppose the internet isn't addictive, and neither is food... https://psychcentral.com/blog/why-internet-addiction-still-doesnt-exist/ https://mindhacks.com/2007/08/20/why-there-is-no-such-thing-as-internet-addiction/ https://www.nhs.uk/news/food-and-diet/food-addiction-doesnt-exist-say-scientists/ >If you're not addicted, go spend a month without looking at any porn or masturbating then Reducing your risk of developing prostate cancer by 30+% through the simple, enjoyable and healthy act of busting a fat nut everyday > disproving an imaginary "addiction" to some random NoFap Cultist kek. https://www.health.harvard.edu/mens-health/ejaculation_frequency_and_prostate_cancer https://www.healthline.com/health/prostate-cancer/ejaculation-prostate-cancer
>>122784 >Urm actually if I do this damaging thing everyday and waste my life browsing facebook memes, and beating my dick raw to hardcore porn, wake up every morning and am compelled to sit on my phone for hours this isn't "addiction" because it isn't constituted in brain chemistry You are literally a retard, aren't you? Do you even read the garbage you post? The Harvard link requires an account to view, so I would assume not. The rest is just fucking useless. Oh wow a study with less than a thousand people divided into 4 age groups, wow, this means it's okay to be hooked up to the internet beaming gigantic hentai titties into my retina for hours a day. If you have a healthy relationship with desires then no you aren't addicted, and no you aren't someone who 'needs' to do 'nofap'. However to deny that these people exist is so fucking brain dead when you can simply scroll up this thread to see the brain rot of the (for lack of a better word) coomer. Read these fucking studies (the prostate ones, I won't bother reading some 'muh Doctor' talk about their philosophical opinion of what internet addiction is or isn't) you moron, they do not claim anything as strong as you state. This "30+%" number is pulled straight out of your fucking ass, here is the study that number is taken https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04319.x Can you understand this? Have you ever read a scientific paper before? The fact is this shit doesn't have anything to do with our discussion. You MAY be reducing your risk of prostate cancer slightly by masturbating, but this has to be weighed against the consequences of the porn addicted generation of men we are faced with. Here's another radical idea for you, why don't you get laid? It'll be a much harder orgasm, by your logic that's probably doubly good for your prostate. I have sex with my gf like every other day, and this avoids every problem to be had regarding the internet and pornography. However the idea that not masturbating is ALWAYS some rightist cult retardation, is in itself the highest form of cringe and lack of logical training. Maybe you would know better if you spent less time masturbating. Spend a month without looking at porn then, since you're so desperate to justify your 'need' to masturbate, like a horny child.
>>122970 All of this requires actually having a girlfriend during the pandemic you fucking candy-ass
>>122735 >Whats JBW? Just Be White As in to get a gf you just have to be a white dude and basically nothing else Preferably a tall one tho
>>122975 Yes the problems of incels, sexism, internet addiction, and porn addiction are problems which began at the start of this year with the pandemic. The point is you don't have to defend porn to justify orgasming for your prostate's sake, there are other options. Not to mention coomers that spout this are far from healthy specimens. Working out everyday will do more for preventing cancer than any amount of masturbation
(294.73 KB 1536x2048 EmR3IMUWEAAzm-n.jpeg)
(311.50 KB 1536x2048 EmR3IMVXcAA2g9l.jpeg)
(465.26 KB 1536x2048 EmGfKmaWoAEdgmF.jpeg)
ASHLEIGH
>>122979 I wasn’t even that anon, I just fucking hate when niggas suggest “solutions” that require having a long term girlfriend that loves you, you asshole
>>123002 It's clear you weren't him. The point still stands, maybe you should commit more time to real relationships as opposed to saving pictures of random girls who don't even know you exist. Like I said in the previous post, there are other methods of self improvement outside of getting a gf that will improve your life and health than chronic masturbation. I didn't even specify gf or love. Just getting laid
(5.87 KB 198x255 3409348_orig.jpeg.jpg)
>>123008 >Just get laid bro >Bro if you just devoted time to meeting women during the pandemic bro <Just lift things up and put them down bro Not even a virgin I just despise this disingenuous shit All to brag about your fuckin girlfriend on an anonymous imageboard
(630.60 KB 830x830 1586285163788.jpg)
>>123010 Defeatist cope. You saying your life wouldn't improve if you exercised?
>>123011 Only thing that would improve my life is ending COVID, G
>>123026 Again you reject your problems and relinquish responsibility of them to some great Other.
>>123028 Because I’m not a liberal https://youtu.be/7kfYOGndVfU
(57.67 KB 703x782 tjs3vp53qfc51.jpg)
>>123034 Read Lenin. Being a revolutionary does not mean crying about not having a gf and blaming all your problems on capitalism. Learn some basic discipline, child. Communism is about human mastery of its self and social being. Not about gibs or state mandated sex dolls.
>>122970 >uld assume not. The rest is just fucking useless. Oh wow a study with less than a thousand people divided into 4 age groups, wow https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15069045/ "Prospective study using follow-up data from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (February 1, 1992, through January 31, 2000) of 29,342 US men aged 46 to 81 years, who provided information on history of ejaculation frequency on a self-administered questionnaire in 1992 and responded to follow-up questionnaires every 2 years to 2000." "high ejaculation frequency was related to decreased risk of total prostate cancer."
>>122970 >I won't bother reading some 'muh Doctor' talk about their philosophical opinion of what internet addiction is or isn't They're not "philosophical opinions". They're statements of fact based on the actual biology/chemistry of what an addiction is, how addiction works and why "porn/masturbation/sex addiction" or "food addiction" or "internet addiction" do not have the characteristics that define actual addictions, such as alcohol addiction for example, and are therefore not addictions. >The Harvard link requires an account to view, so I would assume not. >This "30+%" number is pulled straight out of your fucking ass From archive of the Harvard link: http://archive.is/5qbts "The Health Professionals Follow-Up Study has been collecting information about a large group of volunteers since 1986. All the men are health care providers, including dentists, pharmacists, veterinarians, optometrists, ophthalmologists, and podiatrists. Most are white. In 1992, 29,342 men between the ages of 46 and 81 provided information about their average number of ejaculations per month in young adulthood (age 20–29), middle age (40–49), and in the most recent year. Ejaculations included sexual intercourse, nocturnal emissions, and masturbation. The volunteers provided comprehensive health and lifestyle data every two years until the study concluded in 2000. The scientists found no evidence that frequent ejaculations mark an increased risk of prostate cancer. In fact, the reverse was true: High ejaculation frequency was linked to a decreased risk. Compared to men who reported 4–7 ejaculations per month across their lifetimes, men who ejaculated 21 or more times a month enjoyed a 31% lower risk of prostate cancer. And the results held up to rigorous statistical evaluation even after other lifestyle factors and the frequency of PSA testing were taken into account."
(126.74 KB 1080x1431 aoc b0b.jpg)
>>123035 >Communism is about human mastery of its self and social being. Not about gibs or state mandated sex dolls. Good thing nobody was arguing for "gibs" or "state-mandated sex dolls" then. It sure feels great to knock down strawmen huh. This goes back to >>122970 making yet more strawmen (or possibly anecdotal projections?) about "facebook memes, beat my dick raw to hardcore porn...beaming gigantic hentai titties into my retina for hours a day" in response to links to actual doctors/medical professionals and long-term decades-long studies of 29,342 men which conclusively show that high ejaculation frequency (regardless of whether those ejaculations are from "busting in my gf" aka sex, nocturnal emissions aka "wet dreams" or from masturbation) of almost, approximately or even more than once per day (21 or more times per month) leads to a 31% reduction in the risk of developing prostate cancer compared to men with lower ejaculation frequencies (especially men who only ejaculate 4 to 7 times per month) which is therefore why NoFap is stupid as fuck because you need to bust frequently (ideally everyday) if not for anything else than for purely health reasons as doing this one simple task clears out your prostate and therefore reduces your risk of developing prostate cancer as per the studies. To be fair and completely honest, I haven't fully been living up to this ideal myself lately. In the past several months I've probably busted a fat nut maybe about once every 3 or 4 days on average, so like 10 times or less per month instead of the ideal health range of 21 or more times per month to reduce prostate cancer risk. Mostly because I either don't specifically make the time for it or because I just simply am not feeling it. Contrary to what you may have been led to believe, not every man is constantly 24/7 horny everyday. And before you say it, yes I lift, yes I work cardio, yes I eat a balanced diet with eggs/dairy/meats/veggies/fruits/high-fiber whole grain carbs, yes I drink a lot of water, yes I don't drink alcohol or take any recreational drugs or even any pharmaceutical pills either for that matter, yes I keep my stress levels down. I'm fairly confident that I'm High-Test (evidence of this is that I prefer Huge Teds of Peace on women, the most High-Test preference there is) so it's not a Test issue. More likely I just need to commit everyday to getting in my daily nut at least once, until I do it by force of habit, rather than neglecting it like I am now.
>>123010 >>123011 How about if you have a medical condition that makes women lose interest in you as soon as you tell them about it? And it means you can't do hard exercise? I know I'd just be executed in a "real socialist" state because I can't work to the expected standards but, don't talk about hypotheticals. Masturbation is the only realistic sexual expression for my life, and porn exists and is thankfully accessible on the internet so I will masturbate to porn. I don't buy porn so I'm not supporting its industry or capitalism. I don't want the state to give me a girlfriend, she would only be unhappy with me because I could never satisfy her sexually. Yet, even with all this you'll probably say some bullshit like I just need to get fit and get laid or such.
(63.05 KB 680x940 soy39.jpg)
>>123037 >WOOOAHHH LOOK AT THIS STUDY >DAMMMM I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE XDDDDD >WOAH THE SCIENCE MAN SAYS X THE SCIENCE MAN SAYS Y LOOK HOW BASED HE IS >OMGGGGG IM GONNA CITE A STUDY >LOOK AT THIS PERCENTAGE, ISN'T THAT A BIG NUMBER WOW!!!! >oh fuck... I'm... I'm...I'M >IM GONNA QUOTE A STUDY OUT OF CONTEXT OH YEAH LET ME JUST QUOTE THIS STUDY JUST THIS ONE SENTENCE OH YEAH
>>123113 Executed in socialism, but not communism comrade! If you can browse porn and shit then I imagine you can write software and work in that way. The point of socialism is that we don't work people to the bone like animals but seek to liberate human labour. >>123037 >>123044 You realize you are completely out of your depth right? You realize that you are a complete fucking retard and everyone who knows what they're talking about can blatantly see this. Do you have the slightest clue what a multivariate-adjusted analysis entails? Would you have the smallest crumb of an idea where to start to even begin to execute one? Here look at me! I can quote shit out of context without reading! From your study >most categories of ejaculation frequency were unrelated to risk of total prostate cancer Not to mention this key piece of information >Men with greater lifetime ejaculation frequency tended to be physically more active Wow I wonder if maybe physical health played a part in the reduction of the cancer risk... I dunno I better just find more studies to quote rather than use my brain! The point stands that none of this shit matters in the slightest to the original question. 'Nofap' as a concept is one that is tied to porn addiction primarily, and masturbation addiction secondarily. It isn't some sort of pseudo scientific anti-health cult invented to increase the prices of prostate cancer drugs, you fucking imbecile. It still stands that you can unironically have sex, or just masturbate to your imagination if you subscribe to the view that you need to masturbate to decrease your risk of prostate cancer. I agree, regular ejaculation is likely a healthy thing to do. This isn't the point. The point of contention is how this action is obtained. The meme around nofap is to get autists, like yourself, outside and talking to girls for their ejaculation needs. This is the original point of it. It stems from people realising that they are wasting their lives watching hours of porn every day (muh strawman, muh strawy many!!! muh you claim things that aren't qiute true in my case, no exaggerations allowed no!!!!!!). You deny that these people exists, claiming you simply spend 10 mins a day, jacking it as a purely medical procedure, but no one gives a shit about your isolated personal wank schedule you fucking moron. The point is that there are many people in this very thread who are addicted to this. What does this mean? Does this mean that their brains have a chemical reliance on this shit? Not in the medical sense no. I am addicted to coffee, my brain goes into withdrawal when I don't have it. Is this bad? No. It doesn't actually affect my life in any way because I can easily get coffee and it makes me happy and wastes very little of my time. However the same cannot be said for masturbation. For those hundreds of thousands of boys addicted to the internet, and the subset of those addicted to pornography, they are compelled every day by the force of habit to indulge in this activity, and it hurts their lives. Have you not heard of the masses of people who'd rather stay home and jerk it than go to parties or go on dates? You think there is nothing to this problem of 'endless scroll' of social media that plays on our reward centers to get us to keep clicking for hours on end, to keep watching the next suggested video. What the fuck do we lost by not calling this shit addiction? >ummmmm asshschtually it isn't medically addiction Who gives a shit? If it looks like addiction, sounds like addiction, smells like addiction, it's addiction. It doesn't matter if it's chemically based or not. Is gambling addiction real to you, since it is sufficiently old and widely appreciated as an addiction? How does this function any differently to candy crush or instagram? They rely on the same fundamental biology to keep the user hooker. >>123055 >muh conclusive evidence You think just touting this same statistic 3 posts in a row does anything to help your credibility? It would be nice if ejaculation was a purely functional activity, but that is not the relation most young men have to this action. You ignore the context of the discussion and that is the problem with your reddit brain in these discussions. It sees a debating point, 'nofap' in this case, and lights up. I know the numbers on this! Nofap is bad! Everyone should therefore fap all the time to whatever they want with no criticism! Dam I fucking love science. This isn't directed at YOU personally, you may have a healthy relationship with masturbation (like I have already said). Only you can really determine this. But you would be a complete fool to suggest everyone has a healthy relationship with it. Come on you browse chans, you must know what the situation is for the young men out there. Nofap can be a reactionary tool in certain environments, however the form it has taken on the internet today isn't one to be completely laughed at. In the same way we shouldn't completely discredit some of Jordan Petersons ideas because he has the intelligence of a baby lobster. Cleaning your room is a good thing! Even though the cult around Peterson and the form cleaning your room takes in his ideology is bad. At least we can agree on one thing. Huge Teds is the true high test choice.
>>123146 >'Nofap' as a concept is one that is tied to porn addiction primarily, and masturbation addiction secondarily. It isn't some sort of pseudo scientific... Different anon here, gonna cut you off there comrade, just a simple google/reddit search would show that Nofappers believe in plenty of pseudoscience, >"Nofap gave me improved night vision!" >"Nofap made girls looks at me more during zoom calls!" >"Nofap boosts my focus and energy better than caffeine!" I know lots of redditors are fucking idiots but this kinda nonsense is literally magical thinking. Nofap as a concept does have its merits, like you said, getting people to socialize more, even if there is genuine scientific debate over the validity of porn/masturbation addiction, I don't think anybody has an issue with telling people to fap less and get out more. Nofap as a community, however is full of spirit science level autists who believe that not fapping gives them actual fucking superpowers. I can get behind the *idea* of why not fapping so much can be good for some people and am not discrediting it completely, but fuck me the nofap *community* are deluded TL;DR >Nofap as an idea - eh sure you have a point I guess >Nofap as a community = chuunibyou retards
>>123146 >Executed in socialism, but not communism comrade! Communists would be the first to execute people like me, mate. It already happened once and I do not want it to happen again. >If you can browse porn and shit then I imagine you can write software and work in that way. Why would you imagine that? It takes zero effort to go on Pornhub, no programming knowledge needed. >The point of socialism is that we don't work people to the bone like animals but seek to liberate human labour. Why not liberate humans from labour?
>>123150 Yes these silly things are consequences of it being a 'movement' that surfaced on 4chan. The meme then inflated and got taken to extreme limits, just search on youtube or something 'me on the 5th day of nofap' and it's people levitating and shit. This is the nature of the Meme. However the origins of it are in an attempt of self improval, while this is largely misdirected (same for the Peterson crowd) it is still an attempt at something good. Most men could masturbate less and improve their lives, most men could watch porn A LOT less, especially those who browse chans, wouldn't you agree? But I think fundamentally we do agree here. Kek at the zoom call thing though. I remember the early days of this meme on /fit/ especially and it was so long ago, it is kinda strange it's still attaching to these memes after it was memed to death with no nut november and such. >>123180 In communism you wouldn't have to work brah. If you can browse pornhub you can learn to code online and type code. I dunno how fast you can do this, but it is very much possible. Humans can't be liberated from labour day one of the revolution, that would be silly. Which is why Lenin stated >those who don't work, don't eat However working under socialism would be far more pleasurable since you are working for a cause as opposed to a rat race, obviously this sounds hollow to you, but this would come alongside social changes and decent disability benefits and so on and so on.
(157.56 KB 1080x1350 yellow dress.jpg)
>>123055 >>123145 >>123146 >>123150 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX6xDohq4Ho https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSO4xsv7BlQ NoFap has been BTFO on /fit/ for years. There is simply no peer reviewed research showing you can be addicted to masturbation, abstaining from masturbation improves wellness, or really any claims. NoFap is a cop out and a disservice to men. Male sexuality -- including masturbation -- should not be seen as bad. Read a book, embrace your masculine energy, and continually improve. NoFap discourages all of this.
>>123207 >MUH STUDIES Read the thread. I am immune to your retardation. I bet you go to gambling addiction help groups and smear shit all over walls as you scream about muh 'brain chemicals' >Embrace your masculine energy Lul and this is the non reactionary side is it?
bros why did he kill the thread what was he thinking
>there are people here who would unironically give their hard earned wage for petit-bourgeois thot tits on onlyfans
>>123348 Yeah these threads started out innocent, now it's clearly just filled with cosmetic filter-thots some sad anons are addicted to consooming.
To end all copes ITT, some shit I found on a dating advice place I think it’s over, friendos: “ 51% of men 18 - 29 are single. 32% of women in the same age group are single. 27% of men 30 - 49 are single. 19% of women in the same age group are single. This is according to Pew Research. At all times under 50, single women are more scarce than single men. I tried to make a thread on this before but it was deleted, maybe someone else can try. This is pretty shocking imo. Indicates that there are lots of women dating the same men, unless you believe there is a huge number of 50 - 60 year old men dating very young women (which I don't). Source (chart): https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/08/PSDT_08.19.20_dating.relationships-015.png Source of chart: https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2020/08/20/a-profile-of-single-americans/#share-of-adults-who-are-single-varies-by-race-age-education-and-sexual-orientation”
>>123352 So I guess you're just blissfully unaware of sugardaddies? How about you start researching capitalism, while you're at it?
>>123354 How is this even an argument, Radlib simp?
>>123355 Do you have you suffered brain injuries? How about you re-read your post and my reply.
>>123354 >So I guess you're just blissfully unaware of sugardaddies? How does one get a sugar mommy gf? Should I set my tinder or okcupid to search only 40+ yr old milfs in my area? How lucrative is this presumably niche market? What should I expect as hourly pay, given that I have decent shape and stamina? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTnwrNdtce8 Srs.
Aussies can probably go to prison for the last pic since she's Japanese and has fairly small breasts, so if you're in Australia, you probably shouldn't open it. I also must ask, am I the only one who's wary of posting Japanese and other East Asian women due to the presence of tankies who're going to screech about "neoteny" and such? This is the reason why in previous threads the Japanese and other East Asian women I posted mostly were ones with large breasts. No one else has posted that many small-breasted Japanese or other East Asian women either, is this why or only that everybody else here is obsessed with large breasts?
(202.40 KB 754x1220 4245-023.jpg)
(51.58 KB 468x650 x9gz9r0rpysy.jpg)
Yes, in the last pic is the queen of Bhutan and as her being a queen it's wrong on several levels to "simp" her especially as a leftist. But, you can't deny it, she is one of the most beautiful women in the world. I don't think anyone would be converted into monarchism because of her beauty, though.
>>123414 >No one else has posted that many small-breasted Japanese or other East Asian women either, is this why or only that everybody else here is obsessed with large breasts? For me, it's the strong preference for large breasts. I literally can't get hard unless the tits are at least G cup (preferably bigger though).
>>123445 >I literally can't get hard unless the tits are at least G cup (preferably bigger though). Yup. same motorboat as you. Don't know why, just always has been. Only problem is where I live that require compromise between the boob to belly ratio. A plush slim G+cup tiddy gf would be great. But I'm also a skinnyfat, 27yo PoS who barely earns $55k a year, so I'm not really in a position to even bother trying to get to know any such ladies.
>>123445 Same, I always had a big breast fetish, the size of the breasts is way more important than ass for me.
>>123460 Holy shit I remember jerking it to that first pic when I was about 11 or something. That takes me back
>>123414 If anybody screeches about "neoteny" in a simp thread they are fucking autistic But then again this is a chan after all
Not enough love for the pussy on here. Tit’s are nice but I love a perfect pussy with medium juicy lips. Also a nice thigh gap is super hot
>>123646 I coughed a dry cough when i looked at that stretched out booty and those sweet pussy lips and i don't know how to feel but it's aesthetic as fuck
(3.46 MB goth_jiggle.webm)
For the ass niggas and for the Goth simps
(4.12 MB 640x1138 BadUnrulyClumber-mobile.mp4)
(979.54 KB 400x714 video7.mp4)
(733.82 KB 640x853 f61d27eed3b062a3.png)
I never knew horniness until this pandemic. I'm going crazy.
recently go into russian ASMR. I think the russian people put more effort in and the language itself conducive to asmr https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbUm87PcFwU
(177.57 KB 800x1000 IMG-350.jpg)
Let's gooooooo
(239.04 KB 704x564 fanMen.png)
>>123145 This post reads like pic related Science doesn't stop being true because you posted the right wojak
>>124137 Who’s this?
>>123352 I have been on one date, I'm 34. I guess I'll go on a second one when I'm 65 lmao
>>124212 This is the exact problem you fucking moron. This isn't a problem regarding science being bad, the problem is fucking brain dead retards like yourself who think they can have even the tiniest modicum of understanding of a scientific field by just citing 'muh studies'. >this study said black people stupid! >this study said gambling addiction isn't real! >this study found water on another planet! People who obsess over this shit are the most unscientific pseduo intellectual fucks on Earth. Not everything comes down to some garbage 100 person study where you didn't read (and don't actually understand) the methodology, read philosophy and learn logic and it'll do more for you than googling studies could ever do. Have you ever conducted a multivariate adjusted analysis? I have. Why should I know you have even the slightest clue what you're talking about when you just tell some one line extract from a study? Ironically this is the most anti science shit ever, not actual scientist would want their work reduced to single line reddit titles you regenerate.
(63.00 KB 891x775 hezbollah hottest remix.JPG)
(27.63 KB 673x413 selfie.jpg)
>>124290 >Not everything comes down to some garbage 100 person study The study quoted here >>123044 was a study of 29,342 men, orders of magnitude greater than "just 100 people bro". You know that posts made earlier in this thread are still visible right? This isn't some fast moving cyclical, in case you weren't aware. >And the results held up to rigorous statistical evaluation even after other lifestyle factors and the frequency of PSA testing were taken into account.
>>124532 Wow! You did it! You named a single study that we already addressed that has a decent sample size. Do you want a gold star? Tell me how does this refute anything I've said in my previous post? Are you so stupid that you just pick out single sentences and go >duuhhh wait a minute, I think there are studies of more than a hundred people... *scrolls up thread* just as I suspected! This guy thinks no study exists with more than a hundred people! I'll show him Are you, like, clinically mentally deficient?
>>124536 >You named a single study And you named (Zero) peer-reviewed studies, because NoFap is based on memes and bro-science. >that we already addressed that has a decent sample size. You didn't address shit. What part of that peer-reviewed study of 29,342 men was wrong? It showed a clear direct link between ejaculation frequency and decreased prostate cancer risk which "held up to rigorous statistical evaluation even after other lifestyle factors and the frequency of PSA testing were taken into account." >>123044 This shouldn't even be a stunning revelation. Busting fat nuts daily clears the prostate, thereby lowering the risk of developing prostate cancer. Simple as. >Tell me how does this refute anything I've said in my previous post? Your previous post >>124290 implied that there only existed a 100 person study that you take contention with, rather than the truth that the study you obliquely referred to was a study of 29,342 people. >>123044 Rather disingenuous of you.
>>124560 I can't believe you've even bothered to write this out. You're such a gigantic moron you have so little arguments, you cannot refute my actual points, you can only focus on these tiny points and keep writing the same number over and over again. It's pathetic, and disappointing. Go back to cooming, since it's clear you cannot understand basic logic or read scientific papers with any level of fluency. I never said there exists a 100 person study that I take issue with, are you literally a teenager? You're just so fucking stupid I can't even combat this, you've won. You've actually won by being so braindead retarded that I can't refute your claims. You just change the subject of my post entirely and argue something else. I don't have an issue with that particular study, in fact, if you had the ability to read words, as opposed to copy and paste a single number over and over again, you would note that I said here >>124536 that this study has a good sample size. Is this fucking relevant whatsover? No. Has this already been adressed? Yes. So why are you so fixated on this single irrelevent value? Oh that's right. Your argument is paper thin. Shit it's fucking atomic, you have no idea what you're talking about, you can't discuss methodology, you don't understand basic logic, all you can do is go MUH STUDY MUH NUMBER MUH CHERRY PICKED SENTENCES. Read the post again, try and discern meaning with your human brain, and try to respond with anything with even the slightest bit of value.
(816.47 KB 567x800 Rena Kato.png)
>>124577 >Your argument is paper thin. Shit it's fucking atomic, you have no idea what you're talking about, If the argument I presented via peer-reviewed research is "paper thin/atomic" then yours is non-existent. Keep going on fanatical rants though. That's not going to make the peer-reviewed research go away. Nor is it going to magically create peer-reviewed research showing you can be addicted to masturbation, abstaining from masturbation improves wellness or really any claims of the NoFappers (of which none exists).
>>124606 I can't believe this is what you take from my argument. Are you a bot? I can't imagine a human could have such poor reading comprehension. I've never said this research is bad. The problem is complete braindead morons who have never conducted a single study in their life copy and pasting quotes from papers with zero understanding of methodology, statistical methods, and complete trust in whatever reaffirms their already held views. inb4 >LA LA LA LA LA LA I CANT HEAR YOU 29,342 29,342 29,342 LA LA LA LA LA 29,342 29,342 29,342 WANK=GOOD LA LA LA LA LBLBBLBLBL
(1.88 MB 1920x1080 0182361.png)
just kill me rn
(818.73 KB 698x522 682341.PNG)
(283.12 KB 1080x1074 20200823_090406.jpg)
(264.57 KB 1080x1347 20200823_090324.jpg)
(366.79 KB 1638x2048 oqwbqs2c5p941.jpg)
(62.15 KB 700x865 aKxYGGj_700b.jpg)
nathaliewrth
(110.14 KB 750x1334 EmGljPrVgAAWE4M.jpeg)
(210.17 KB 1469x2048 EdKarowUwAAh8Pv.jpeg)
(203.47 KB 1302x1956 Eb2-mAlU4AUJHDY.jpeg)
(59.55 MB 1280x720 7431544-720p.mp4)
>>124683 Man Ya know Watching this sort of ASMR shit I really gotta ask How the fuck does it not cause people to develop mental problems? Like, if you’re watching this shit, as a dude, 90% chance you are single. Given how shit life now is, odds of breaking out of your solitude are very low. So you basically watch all this tender, intimate shit from someone that doesn’t even know you exist. At least hardcore porn is evidently just completely soulless and devoid of intimacy, it might fuck with how you view women but it won’t directly fuck with your emotional stability most of the time. Whereas with the ASMR I got less than five seconds in before realizing I can’t watch rhis shit. This is like the JOI from Blade Runner but so much worse, at least JOI could interact with K, this is like the Devil dangling a little dancing minion in your face but you know you can never break through the glass and you can’t ever see her. Over for the ASMRcels tbh
>>124739 i agree. dont get dudes who buy onlyfans stuff either.
>>124739 >Given how shit life now is, odds of breaking out of your solitude are very low. So you basically watch all this tender, intimate shit from someone that doesn’t even know you exist. (not the anon you're replying to.) You make interesting points . What is the difference from this ASMR stuff direct to camera (i. e to you, the viewer), from let's say the escapism involved in reading novels in the nineteenth century, or watching the products of Hollywood's dream factory in the twentieth? It seems to me the difference is you don't psychologically identify with a character on the page or on the screen or nasty Max Hardcore in the case of porn, for that matter. There's no character there to identify with. Ms. ASMR is pretending to speak directly to you, anon. Even with vidya games there's a protagonist to pretend to be. So in that respect, ASMR videos lack escapism! You don't have to imaginatively project into the subjectivity of someone else for it to work. And consequently, there's not even the slight possibility there is with fiction of being inspired to take a character somewhat as a role model and grow in some way. How many kids got into martial arts through watching Bruce Lee flicks in the 70s. or this ex-copper inspired by Batman http://buildingbatman.blogspot.com/2008/10/building-batman.html?m=0 >>124757 >i agree. dont get dudes who buy onlyfans stuff either. Not them either, but I do get this myself. Some of it, it's like the ultimate gonzo porn, you seem to be getting the models own life. It's the same with Tracey Emin's unmade bed. A ticket into someone who is cooler than you, into their life. What I don't understand myself is breadtube/patreon discord chats about politics. If you join a union, now we're in lockdown you'll get invitations to more Zoom meetings than you want.
(75.98 KB 500x668 dodgers waifu.jpg)
>>124767 >What I don't understand myself is breadtube/patreon discord chats about politics. >If you join a union, now we're in lockdown you'll get invitations to more Zoom meetings than you want. I really, really don't like zoom meetings 2bh. Something about them is just exhausting idk how to describe it.
(295.02 KB 800x1147 18077.jpg)
(67.95 KB 1024x683 zanna.jpg)
>>123445 >>123460 >>123488 I think I've noticed that on average authleft and authright seem to focus on big tits, libleft and libright seem to focus on overall attractiveness, and everyone in between seem to focus on big ass. Not sure if this is accurate at all, please don't take offence. It's just a pattern I seem to have noticed. I'm libleft myself and I've always focused on overall attractiveness (and somehow "smug" facial features), so for me my perceived pattern holds at least mostly. Big tits are hot, but so are big asses, and for me with both there comes a size that's too big. >>123515 Someone did in one of the previous threads, to call everyone who has a preference for East Asian women pedos. It's a /pol/ tier argument, but it's not the only time I've seen leftists argue it. I've also been called pedo for finding cute faces attractive, and also gay but anyone who still implies homosexuality is bad is a child at least mentally. >>124739 >>124683 She's very cute and hot, I've fapped to that video twice already. Not a big fan of braces, I've never understood why Americans get them unless their teeth are a total clusterfuck and even think they make someone more attractive but I'm not judging. They just seem pointless to me unless it actually affects your chewing or such, but then I'm not American so what do I know. On her they're kinda hot though, gotta admit. >>124767 I watch hot ASMR videos and nothing goes on in my head when I do except that it's hot, and I literally have a mental illness. There isn't even an illusion of her "talking directly to me" because it's a video. It's not a livestream. With streams I could see the argument made it might fuck with your mind, but even then only during the stream. But, I'm single and for various reasons I mostly have no control over will likely remain single for the rest of my life. Does that mean ASMR is reducing my chances of finding a girlfriend? If anything, ASMR videos and eye contact videos (are you in to be creeped out when you discover those!) have already helped learn to look people in the eyes in real life, because I've been able to practise it with videos. Obviously I know they're not actually looking at me but at a camera, that does mean it's easier to look at a video of someone looking at a camera than to look at someone in the eyes in real life, but it has made it noticeably easier. As for eye contact videos, sometimes I fap to them too even if there's nothing sexual. Haven't started fapping when looking at attractive women in the eyes in real life. I know it's "creepy" to fap to things that weren't made to be fapped to, and maybe I'm just better at compartmentalising than a mentally healthy person, but there's no reason not to fap to something if you find it hot. I've also fapped to the selfies of friends and it doesn't make it any more awkward to hang out with them, because horniness is fleeting. I can fap to a friend's selfies and then talk to her in five minutes, because my mind isn't in horny mode anymore. Before telling me I need to kms because I'm a creep who'll only give women bad memories, I'm not even attempting to find a girlfriend and believe that if I found a "soulmate", we'd be fully compatible. So I'm not even interested unless it'd be real love, which is "cringy" and "bourgeoise" but I'm not having that debate again.
(48.75 KB 600x815 zimg_001_1111.jpg)
(135.43 KB 720x1080 ZuTbCy3jy3k.jpg)
(157.49 KB 975x1300 53456.jpg)
Messed up the replies in the previous post a bit, pretty sure it's not confusing anyway though.
>>124882 things leftists like, lets start a list: Hairy pussy
(117.19 KB 1023x682 172.jpg)
>>124914 a nice healthy patch is also a welcome sight and a sign of good health
>>124914 >>124934 A girl about to say she loves me in the last few minutes until I wake up
(59.91 KB 680x1072 5b3.jpg)
>>124914 Tomboys

Delete
Report

no cookies?