>enablers of misandry
feminist misandry isnt really a serious problem in and of itself. Its only a problem inasmuch as its retarded and drives people away from things too heavily associated with/sharing a label with the retards.
I mean, I'll defend you here- the basic, stupid, un-nuanced background ethos the average person calling themselves by some label have does matter. it shouldnt change what you actually believe but it should make you stop and think about how to describe yourself, labels can get poisoned and veer too far off course to keep being useful, and regardless of what you personally believe as a feminist, or what feminists you actually like and agree with say, the broader meme has been run into the ground with idiotic misandry and the same myopic blindness to the other genders experiences and feelings they accurately observe men as having for women. you could reply, "well you could say the same thing about socialism and obviously that would be wrong", but thats not so obvious. if socialism really, thoroughly means 'things republicans accuse of being socialism, and social justice' in everyones minds, then itd be good to drop the term. not the ideas, but the term. it no longer describes the ideas accurately. the word means what people use it to mean, not some ideal thing that comes from its etymology or history.
But-
its stupid to talk about those things like they're some sort of dangerous threat, or to get upset at them as morally abhorrent, using terms like "enabling misandry" as though the misandry itself were a serious problem. you're under no more threat from misandrous feminist as the average woman is from mysoginistic wizards.
also, you could call it HBT. homosexual, bisexual, transsexual. Thatd make it less alphabet soup too.

As for how to handle idpol cunts parasitic relationship with leftism:fuck, man, I dunno.