/leftypol/ - Leftypol

Proletariat without Borders

Mode: Thread

Max file size: limitless

Max files: 3

Remember to follow the rules

Max message length: 4096


/Leftypol/ is a backup board for 8ch.net/leftypol/.

IRC: Rizon.net #bunkerchan
https://qchat.rizon.net/?channels=bunkerchan


Body Odor's dad is an gay. Comrade 03/29/2018 (Thu) 18:30:17 [Preview] No. 6694 [Reply]
BO of 8ch leftypol is a pile of shit and censors people who disagrees with him. If you value your right to express your opinion on 8chan I strongly encourage you move to leftpol or another equally free leftist image board.
>>6694
Why not bunkerchan?

Open file (175.99 KB 294x248 pan of kek.png)
Council Communism Appreciation Thread Comrade 03/28/2018 (Wed) 23:31:57 [Preview] No. 6692 [Reply]

Open file (116.74 KB 680x788 e61.png)
Comrade 03/24/2018 (Sat) 23:59:02 [Preview] No. 6670 [Reply]
Im socialist who is the son of Cuban exiles in Miami. Am I a hypocrite for not moving back to Cuba? Im not a Marxist Leninist of course (or a Marxist in general), but it still feels like shit.
You're Fine. 'Rican here, and while I appreciate Cuba's socialist history as well as the historical cultural bonds that Cuba and PR share, you really don't have to feel obligated to move back or anything.

I, and a lot of others, would argue that Cuba as it stands now isn't socialist anymore either. It went the revisionist route of most 20th century socialist states and was likely the victim of Krushchevist social imperialism. Performativism doesn't accomplish anything, anyway.

Besides, I'm sure people here need you more to help spread a leftist influence and raise class consciousness :)

Alternative hypothesis Comrade 03/25/2018 (Sun) 01:27:48 [Preview] No. 6671 [Reply]
https://youtu.be/SrmTPs9iLWA

This is what /pol/tards actually belive
Can you refute?

Feminist cancer kill the left. Comrade 03/23/2018 (Fri) 12:53:47 [Preview] No. 6660 [Reply]
most left wing groups online have feminists gatekeeping them.

if you challenge the anti male, anti working class feminist narrative you will be banned, it is as simple as that.

Also you get a lot of disingenuous leftists who pretend to be against SJW's but do nothing to tackle feminism. So that means they are enablers of misandry.

Also the left is full of lgbt nonsense as well. The LGBT is a feminist term, as there is no such thing as a LGBT person.

The old gay man's movement was called GLBT, but feminists told gay men to check their privilege and took the movement over.

you know after gay men did all the rioting and took the risks, women then took over.
>enablers of misandry
feminist misandry isnt really a serious problem in and of itself. Its only a problem inasmuch as its retarded and drives people away from things too heavily associated with/sharing a label with the retards.
I mean, I'll defend you here- the basic, stupid, un-nuanced background ethos the average person calling themselves by some label have does matter. it shouldnt change what you actually believe but it should make you stop and think about how to describe yourself, labels can get poisoned and veer too far off course to keep being useful, and regardless of what you personally believe as a feminist, or what feminists you actually like and agree with say, the broader meme has been run into the ground with idiotic misandry and the same myopic blindness to the other genders experiences and feelings they accurately observe men as having for women. you could reply, "well you could say the same thing about socialism and obviously that would be wrong", but thats not so obvious. if socialism really, thoroughly means 'things republicans accuse of being socialism, and social justice' in everyones minds, then itd be good to drop the term. not the ideas, but the term. it no longer describes the ideas accurately. the word means what people use it to mean, not some ideal thing that comes from its etymology or history.
But-
its stupid to talk about those things like they're some sort of dangerous threat, or to get upset at them as morally abhorrent, using terms like "enabling misandry" as though the misandry itself were a serious problem. you're under no more threat from misandrous feminist as the average woman is from mysoginistic wizards.
also, you could call it HBT. homosexual, bisexual, transsexual. Thatd make it less alphabet soup too.

As for how to handle idpol cunts parasitic relationship with leftism:fuck, man, I dunno.
nice try FBI
>>6666
Nice quads!
>>6663
You are deliberately trying to downplay the potential danger that feminists represent to others by asserting that they need to gain strong control of the system in order to produce affects on the lives of others. This is demonstrably false: the feminist movement has enough power in western societies that men are imprisoned because a woman placed his name on a piece of paper, are made homeless because a woman accused him of violence and can generally use their position in society to negatively affect the lives of those for whom they hold animosity. Furthermore, there are laws women can use to rein in those wizards you point to. Feminists are a threat in the same way that black nationalists are a (lesser) threat and neither are something that needs to be allowed greater access to the levers of power.

Open file (248.34 KB 573x546 Kek 2.png)
Commies Comrade 02/10/2018 (Sat) 03:14:22 [Preview] No. 6569 [Reply]
Get your own memes faggots
4 posts and 3 images omitted.
Open file (51.98 KB 1024x1024 057.jpg)
Open file (12.52 KB 450x460 Stop tread.jpg)
Open file (24.14 KB 432x239 2eb.png)
>>6572
>being authoritarian
Its so easy to make leftards abandon principles. They don't really hold them with any conviction anyway, I guess.
You want to come up with a good symbol to fuck with /pol/ breed minarchist libertarians, try something different, like cutting it into eight pieces with a slamming cut coming from the foreground, with like a butchers knife.

Speaking in terms of memes, you're literally attacking the symbol, emphasis on you. You've already subliminally added the viewer to your collective, and made him take part in the destruction of the enemy, and a butchers knife implies consumption. Captions are for them, because when you post this, you are the silent, indomitable, implacable shitposting anon.

Its aggressive, simple, and works, by playing on their worst fears, divide and conquer, and assimilation.

Open file (2.92 MB 1198x1040 jews.PNG)
Comrade 03/06/2018 (Tue) 04:38:30 [Preview] No. 6611 [Reply]
niggers are bad
Crackers go home to Europe.
Why?

Open file (85.97 KB 600x706 1490146895790.jpg)
/ego/ general Comrade 01/23/2018 (Tue) 06:48:06 [Preview] No. 6542 [Reply]
Give me one reason, ONE why this man is wrong
>protip you cant
6 posts and 1 image omitted.
>>6608
Multiple people sharing similar delusions doesn't make them basically real. Things that dont exist do not, actually, for any contrived dance around it one can make, exist.
How some illusion impacts peoples perception is relevant if you want to change peoples perception or get them to do something. It should have nothing to do with what you yourself actually think. Whatever happens to be convenient to achieving whatever goal you've decided on doesnt affect what's real.
Defining your beliefs about what you feel is good and should happen/bad and shouldnt based on whats pragmatic towards what you /already/ think is is circular and retarded.
>>6609
Pro-Tip: Something can be "real" and not exist at the same time.

Ignoring that social trends and constructs have an effect on how the world functions, while simultaneously assuming that humans can entirely undo all of them and never have an abstract concept or system again is ahistorical and idealist tbh

Stirnerite faggots go home. If Marx hadn't torn Stirner to shreds, no one would have known he existed.
>>6617
> Something can be "real" and not exist at the same time.
Oh im having a laff m8.
'People think something is true' being true and 'thing is true' being true are not the same.
>Ignoring that social trends and constructs have an effect on how the world functions
I never said that. I said they aren't real. The subjects of the social constructs that is, not the fact that people believe in them.
Every time someone makes this shit argument that "but ppl think so and so they do things didferently so it EFFECTS STUFF" they're just using it as abit of mental gymnastics to make the leap to 'so yeah its basically real in some sense I can now go on acting and feeling as though it is.'
No its not.
People who call themselves stirnerites, symbolize themselves with that awful teal and black flag, and don't understand that spook = identity taken seriously - these people make me question my deep enthusiasm for his philosophy.
>Ignoring that social trends and constructs have an effect on how the world functions

His acknowledgement of that is a founding principle of his philosophy.

He doesn't oppose all abstraction. He knows full well to get rid of all social constructs is to get rid of all thought. He rather wants as many people as possible to recognize and embrace the fact that all actions are done for an agency that exists beyond identity.

If you read his book you'd know he's completely aware that this perspective has become contingent on historical processes.

Open file (29.11 KB 331x334 e40.jpg)
Max Stirner Explained: Part 2 (politics) Comrade 03/18/2018 (Sun) 15:43:33 [Preview] No. 6643 [Reply]

Open file (64.17 KB 735x596 Untitled.png)
Comrade 03/15/2018 (Thu) 00:36:28 [Preview] No. 6627 [Reply]
/pol/ is trying to rig a small town's poll about gun control.
No vote limit, just rightclick the poll and press 'reload frame.'
http://www.king5.com/votenow
>>6627
This site is too small

Delete
Report

no cookies?