/dead/ - Post-left Conspiracy HQ

/grim/ is /dead/; long live /dead/

Mode: Reply

Max file size: limitless

Max files: 3

Remember to follow the rules

Max message length: 4096

Open file (23.50 KB 512x512 think.jpg)
Comrade 05/09/2017 (Tue) 20:38:02 [Preview] No. 267
asked this on /leftypol/ and naturally i got no discussion

are there any non-moralist arguments against pedophilia?
can you be more specific? To what degree do you want to pursue 'pedophilia'? Holding hands? blowjob? pregnancy? BDSM?
Makes parents upset, they'll probs shoot you. It's in your interest to not be a pedo.
When they inevitably become adults they might find you and beat the shit out of or kill you
Open file (106.74 KB 803x846 image.jpeg)
Because it's unnatural and contributes nothing to the continuation of the human race.

What happens to "pedophiles" in the wild?
>Attracted to children
>Have sex with child
>Unable to procreate
>Genetic dead end
If the person/animal continues to have sex with prepubescent children then literally nothing happens. Their bloodlines ends with them. Problem solved.

Adding stuff like
>it's wrong
>b-but the child's well being
>b-but it makes them happy
are moral arguments that only apply in social constructs that can shapeshift depending on the time and place. But at the end of the day having sex with a child that is unable to bear children contributes nothing.

You can be a moral relativist all you want but at the end of the day if you aren't having children then you are irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. That is literally your only job as a human and what drives us as a species. Sex is the road to reproduction. Reproduction is how we continue our species.

We can all act like things like homosexuality, pedos, and other sexual activities other than hetero-normative ones are a-ok in a modern moralist sense but if it came down to the nitty gritty of keeping our species alive (let's say there were only 50 people left on the planet) these activities and attractions would do more harm than good.

Thankfully we have billions on this planet so a few percentage of them not breeding can be excused, tolerated and even accepted socially.
Children are conditioned to be obedient to adults and higher-authority figures. Due to their inherent lack of experience and therefore lack of knowledge on the subject, they are easily manipulated into engaging in sex.
Another important point is that children are not recognized as real human beings but rather as property of their respective parents (or legal guardians). This can sometimes be inconsistent but this is the general attitude.

The moral argument is very important because morality is inherently a societal construct. If society didn't exist and it was just you and a 12 year old girl there are no extra reasons against intercourse when compared to a 20-year old with a medical-condition you need to be mindful of.

But because society exists, just don't fuck kiddies. It's that simple.
> Due to their inherent lack of experience and therefore lack of knowledge on the subject, they are easily manipulated into engaging in sex.
The same thing can be said of many adults, but this is not a crime. The assumption must therefore be made that sex is something inherently harmful somehow. Now, I don't like the idea of pedos because it's icky, and I know that's not the most rational reason to give, but it's the same reason I don't get into other weird shit. Maybe we just need to realize that hating pedos might actually be human nature for one reason or another.


Captcha (required for reports and bans by board staff)

no cookies?